I contend that, together with increasing diversity of subject matter, there is a contraction of methods and approaches in psychology today. There is decreasing room for small, but critical, parts of the field—particularly those in cultural-scientific aspects of psychology, such as the history, philosophy, and theory of psychology and general psychology. These areas provide the foundations of entire discipline. These changes occur in the context of growing anti-intellectualism in society at large and changing pressures in universities. I explore these trends at these three levels: society, universities, and psychology, and suggest some remedies for psychology.
CrabbeN. (2009, June 17). Playing the college ratings game. Gainesville Sun, 1A, 5A.
14.
CronbachL. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.
15.
DewsburyD. A. (2000). The marginalization of academic, non-scientific psychology in the American Psychological Association. The General Psychologist, 35, 96–97.
16.
DonoghueF. (2008). The last professors: The corporate university and the fate of the humanities. New York: Fordham University Press.
17.
DunlapK. (1938). The impending dismemberment of psychology. Manuscript of address to the National Institute of Psychology, Columbus, OH, September 7, Columbus, OH. Box M565, Knight Dunlap Papers, Archives of the History of American Psychology, Akron, OH.
18.
EngellJ., & DangerfieldA. (2005). Saving higher education in the age of money. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
19.
EvansR. B. (1990). William James, The Principles of Psychology, and experimental psychology. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 433–447.
20.
FussellP. (1991). BAD or, the dumbing of America. New York: Simon & Schuster.
21.
GreenbergD. S. (2007a). On the road to academic greatness–a parable. Science, 317, 1328–1329.
22.
GreenbergD. S. (2007b), Science for sale: The perils, rewards, and delusions of campus capitalism. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
HalpernD. F., SmothergillD. W., AllenM., BakerS., BaumC., BestD.,… WeaverK. A. (1998). Scholarship in psychology: A paradigm for the twenty-first century. American Psychologist, 53, 1292–1297.
24.
HenriquesG. (2003). The tree of knowledge system and the theoretical unification of psychology. Review of General Psychology, 7, 159–182.
25.
HofstadterR. (1962). Anti-intellectualism in American life. New York: Knopf.
26.
JacobyS. (2008). The age of American unreason. New York: Pantheon.
KaufmannW. (1995). The future of the humanities: Teaching art, religion, philosophy, literature, and history. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
31.
KimbleG. A. (1984). Psychology's two cultures. American Psychologist, 39, 833–839.
32.
KochS. (1981). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge: Lessons of a century of qua “science.”American Psychologist, 36, 257–269.
33.
KochS. (1993). “Psychology” of “the psychological studies”?American Psychologist, 48, 902–904.
34.
KuklaA. (1989). Nonempirical issues in psychology. American Psychologist, 44, 785–794.
35.
MooreJ. H. (2006, October 15). In the business of education, is quantity more important than quality?Gainesville Sun, (p. 3G).
36.
MyersD. G., & WallerJ. E. (1999). Reflections on scholarship from the liberal arts academy. American Psychologist, 54, 358–361.
37.
PerloffR. (2004). Beyond psychology: Literature and the arts as supplements for understanding, predicting, and controlling behavior: Thinking outside the box. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 411–417.
SamelsonF. (1988, June). The “impending dismemberment of psychology” and its miraculous rescue, 1930–45. Paper presented at meetings of the Cheiron Society, Princeton, NJ.
40.
SeminaraJ. L., & PetersG. A. (1959). American psychology: As seen from abroad. American Psychologist, 14, 238–239.
41.
SlifeB. D., & WilliamsR. N. (1997). Toward a theoretical psychology: Should a subdiscipline be formally recognized?American Psychologist, 52, 117–129.
42.
StaatsA. W. (1981). Paradigmatic behaviorism, unified theory, unified theory construction methods, and the Zeitgiest of separation. American Psychologist, 36, 239–256.
43.
StaatsA. W. (1983). Psychology's crisis of disunity: Philosophy and method for a unified science. New York: Praeger.
44.
StaatsA. W. (1999). Unifying psychology requires new infrastructure, theory, method, and a research agenda. Review of General Psychology, 3, 3–13.
45.
SternbergR. J. (2005). Unity in psychology: Possibility or pipedream?Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
