Recent articles calling for a scientific study of magic have been the subject of widespread interest. This article considers the topic from a broader perspective and argues that to engage in a science of magic, in any meaningful sense, is misguided. It argues that those who have called for a scientific theory of magic have failed to explain either how or why such a theory might be constructed, that a shift of focus to a neuroscience of magic is simply unwarranted, and that a science of magic is itself an inherently unsound idea. It seeks to provide a more informed view of the relationship between science and magic and suggests a more appropriate way forward for scientists.
BeckD. M., MuggletonN., WalshV., & LavieN. (2006). Right parietal cortex plays a critical role in change blindness. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 712–717.
2.
BeckD. M., ReesG., FrithC. D., & LavieN. (2001). Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 645–650.
3.
BestermanT. (1932). The psychology of testimony in relation to paraphysical phenomena: Report of an experiment. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 40, 363–387.
4.
BinetA. (1894). Psychology of prestidigitation. Annual report of the board of regents of the Smithsonian Institution (pp. 555–571). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Fernandez-DuqueD., GrossiG., ThorntonI. M., & NevilleH. J. (2003). Representation of change: Separate electrophysiological markers of attention, awareness, and implicit processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 491–507.
13.
FitzkeeD. (1945). The trick brain. Oakland, CA: Magic Limited.
14.
HodgsonR., & DaveyS. J. (1894). The possibilities of malobservation and lapse of memory from a practical point of view. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 4, 381–495.
15.
HuettelS. A., GuzeldereG., & McCarthyG. (2001). Dissociating the neural mechanisms of visual attention in change detection using functional MRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 1006–1018.
16.
HymanR. (1989). The psychology of deception. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 133–154.
17.
JastrowJ. (1897). Magic stage illusions and scientific diversions, including trick photography [book review]. Science, 6, 850–851.
18.
JohanssonP., HallL., SikstromS., & OlssonA. (2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science, 310, 116–119.
19.
JohanssonP., HallL., SikstromS., TarningB., & LindA. (2006). How something can be said about telling more than we can know. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 673–692.
20.
JonesW. H., & RussellD. (1980). The selective processing of belief disconfirming information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 309–312.
21.
KaufmannR. (2009). Genii speaks. Genii, 70, 11.
22.
KelleyH. (1977). Magic tricks: The management of causal attributions. In GurlitzD., Perspectives on attribution research and theory: The Bielefeld symposium (pp. 19–35). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Ballinger.
KlucharevV., SmidtsA., & FernándezG. (2008). Brain mechanisms of persuasion: How “expert power” modulates memory and attitudes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 353–366.
25.
KuhnG., AmlaniA., & RensinkR. (2008). Towards a science of magic. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 349–354.
LamontP., & WisemanR. (1999). Magic in theory: An introduction to the theoretical and psychological elements of conjuring. Hatfield, United Kingdom: University of Hertfordshire Press.
28.
LamontP., & WisemanR. (2003). Seeing and believing. Magic, 13, 86–87.
NardiP. (1984). Towards a social psychology of entertainment magic. Symbolic Interaction, 7, 25–42.
36.
OrtizD. (1994). Strong magic: Creative showmanship for the close-up magician. Silver Spring, MD: Kaufman & Greenberg.
37.
ParrisB. A., KuhnG., MizonG. A., BenattayallahA., & HodgsonT. L. (2009). Imaging the impossible: An fMRI study of impossible causal relationships in magic tricks. NeuroImage, 45, 1033–1039.
38.
PolidoroM. (2006). The magic in the brain: How conjuring works to deceive our minds. In Della SalaS., Tall tales about the mind and brain (pp. 36–43). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
39.
PourtoisG., De PrettoM., HauertC., & VuilleumierP. (2006). Time course of brain activity during change blindness and change awareness: Performance is predicted by neural events before change onset. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 2108–2129.
SimonsD. J., & ChabrisC. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 58, 1059–1074.
44.
SteinmeyerJ. (2003). Hiding the elephant. New York: Carroll & Graf.
45.
SwissJ. I. (2000). Magic in theory [book review]. Genii, 63, 68–70.
46.
TamarizJ. (1988). The magic way. Madrid, Spain: Frakson Books.
47.
TriplettN. (1900). The psychology of conjuring deceptions. American Journal of Psychology, 11, 439–510.
48.
TurattoM., AngrilliA., MazzaV., UmiltaC., & DriverJ. (2002). Looking without seeing the background change: Electrophysiological correlates of change detection versus change blindness. Cognition, 84, B1–B10.
49.
WisemanR. (1996). Towards a psychology of deception. The Psychologist, 9, 61–64.
50.
WisemanR., & GreeningE. (2005). “It's still bending”: Verbal suggestion and alleged psychokinetic metal bending. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 115–127.
