The concept of novelty has acquired a large number of diverse referents over the past quarter-century as a result of new methods that permit measurement of a variety of biological and behavioral reactions to novel incentives in both humans and animals. As a result, the term has acquired varied meanings. This analysis of novelty makes four claims. First, the specific state of uncertainty that a novel event creates depends on its origin. Second, unexpected events that alter the immediate stimulus surround (called stimulus novelty) should be distinguished from those that are inconsistent with an agent's long term knowledge (called conceptual novelty). Third, the critical features that render an event novel can vary with the agent's intention to classify or to act on an object and the balance between these two frames changes with development. Finally, the state of uncertainty created when an agent must choose one response from two or more alternatives differs from the states provoked by stimulus and conceptual novelty.
AcklesP. K. (2008). Stimulis novelty and cognitive-related ERP components of the infant brain. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106, 3–20.
2.
AkersK. G., YangZ., DelVecchioD. P., ReebB. C., RomeoR. D., McEwenB. S., & TangA. C. (2008). Social competitiveness and plasticity of neuroendocrine function in old age: Influence of neonatal novelty exposure and maternal care reliability. PloS ONE, 1, e2840.
3.
AndersenB., MruczekR. E. B., KawasakiK., & SheinbergD. (2008). Effects of familiarity on neural activity in monkey inferior temporal lobe. Cerebral Cortex, (in press).
4.
BahrickL. E., & NewellL. C. (2008). Infant discrimination of faces in naturalistic events: Actions are more salient than faces. Developmental Psychology, 44, 983–996.
5.
BelovaM. A., PatonJ. J., MorrisonS. E., & SalzmanC. D. (2007). Expectation modulates neural responses to pleasant and aversive stimuli in primate amygdala. Neuron, 55, 970–984.
BrinkmanM. J., & StauderJ. E. (2008). The development of passive auditory novelty processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, (in press).
8.
BrittonJ. C., ShinL. M., BarrettL. F., RauchS. L., & WrightC. I. (2008). Amygdala and fusiform gyrus temporal dynamics: Responses to negative facial expressions. BMC Neuroscience, 9, 44–48.
9.
BuhrK. & DugasM. J. (2002). The intolerance of uncertainty scale: Psychometric properties of the English version. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 931–945.
10.
BunzeckN., & DuzelE. (2006). Absolute coding of stimulus novelty in the human substantia nigra/VTA. Neuron, 51, 369–379.
11.
BusseyT. J., & SaksidaL. M. (2007). Memory, perception, and the ventral visual- perirhinal-hippocampal stream: Thinking outside of the boxes. Hippocampus, 17, 898–908.
12.
CalaminusC., & HauberW. (2008). Guidance of instrumental behavior under reversal conditions requires dopamine D1 and D2 receptor activation in the orbitofrontal cortex. Neuroscience, 154, 1195–1204.
13.
CassiaV. M., ValenzaE., SimionF., & LeoI. (2008). Congruency as a non-specific perceptual property contributing to newborns’ face preference. Child Development, 79, 807–820.
14.
Cavina-PratesiC., GoodaleM. A., & CulhamJ. C. (2007). FMRI reveals a dissociation between grasping and perceiving the size of real 3D objects. PloS ONE, 2, e424.
15.
ChapaisB., (2008). Primeval kingship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
CheneyD. L., & SeyfarthR. M. (2007). Baboon metaphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
ChristenfeldN., PhillipsD. P., & GlynnL. M. (1999). What's in a name: Mortality and the power of symbols. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 47, 241–254.
18.
DaselaarS. M., FleckM. S., PrinceS. E., & CabezaR. (2006). The medial temporal lobe distinguishes old from new independently of consciusness. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 5835–5839.
19.
DaumM. M., PrinzW., & AscherslebenG. (2008). Encoding the goal of an object- directed but uncompleted reaching action in 6- and 9-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 11, 607–619.
20.
DiamondA. (1990). Developmental and neural basis of memory functions as indexed by the A not B and delayed response tasks in human infants and infant monkeys. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608, 267–309.
21.
DienJ., SpencerK. M., & DonchinE. (2003). Localization of the event-related potential novelty responses as defined by principal components analysis. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 637–650.
22.
D'ArdenneK., McClureS. M., NystromL. E., & CohenJ. D. (2008). BOLD responses reflecting dopaminergic signals in the human ventral tegmental area. Science, 319, 1264–1267.
23.
ElazaryL., & IttiL. (2008). Interesting objects are visually salient. Journal of Vision, 8, 1–15.
24.
FiserJ., & AslinR. N. (2002). Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99, 15822–15826.
25.
FuruyashikiT., HollandP. C., & GallagherM. (2008). Rat orbitofrontal cortex separately encodes response and outcome information during performance of goal-directed behavior. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 5127–5138.
26.
GanelT., ChajutE., & AlgomD. (2008). Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles. Current Biology, 18, R599–601.
27.
GanelT., TanzerM., & GoodaleM. A. (2008). A double dissociation between action and perception in the context of visual illusions: Opposite effects of real and illusory size. Psychological Science, 19, 221–225.
28.
GehringW. J., GrattonG., ColesM. G., & DonchinE. (1992). Probability effects on stimulus evaluation and response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 198–216.
29.
GoldsteinA., SpencerK. M., & DonchinE. (2002). The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3. Psychophysiology, 39, 781–790.
30.
GomesH., SussmanE., RitterW., KurtzbergD., CowanN., & VaughanH. G.Jr. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence of developmental changes in the duration of auditory sensory memory. Developmental Psychology, 35, 294–302.
31.
GundersenH., SpechtK., GrunerR., ErslandL., & HugdahlK. (2008). Separating the effects of alcohol and expectancy on brain activation. An fMRI working memory study. Neuroimage, (in press).
32.
HagoortP., WasenaarM., & BrownC. M. (2003). Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 38–50.
33.
HarkinB. L., & MayesG. M. (2008). Implicit awareness of ambiguity: A role in the development of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 861–869.
34.
HaushoferJ., BakerC. I., LivingstoneM. S., & KanwisherN. (2008). Privileged coding of convex shapes in human object-selective cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 100, 753–762.
35.
HausmanC. R. (1975). A discourse on novelty and creation. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
36.
HeereyE. A., & KringA. M. (2007). Interpersonal consequences of social anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 125–134.
37.
HerryC., BachD. R., EspositoF., Di SalleF., PerrigW. J., SchefflerK., LuthiA. (2007). Processing of temporal unpredictability in human and animal amygdala. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 5958–5966.
38.
HietanenJ. K., & LeppanenJ. M. (2008). Judgment of other people's facial expressions of emotions is influenced by their concurrent affective hand movements. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 221–230.
39.
HirshJ. B., & InzlichtM. (2008). The devil you know. Psychological Science, 19, 962–967.
40.
HollandP. C., & GallagherM. (2006). Different roles for amygdala central nucleus and substantia innominata in the surprise-induced enhancement of learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 3791–3797.
41.
HolowayR. M., HeimbergR. G., & ColesM. E. (2006). A comparison of intolerance of uncertainty in analogue obsessive-compulsive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 20, 158–174.
42.
IachiniT., BorghiA. M., & SeneseV. P. (2008). Categorization and sensorimotor interaction with objects. Brain and Cognition, 67, 31–43.
43.
JacobsJ. V., FujiwaraK., TomitaH., FuruneN., KunitaK., & HorakF. B. (2008). Changes in the activity of the cerebral cortex relate to postural response modification when warned of a perturbation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 1431–1442.
44.
JanssenP., SrivastavaS., OmbeletS., & OrbanG. A. (2008). Coding of shape and position in macaque lateral intraparietal area. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 6679–6690.
45.
JaxS. A., & RosenbaumD. A. (2008). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Rapid decay of dorsal stream information. Neuropsychologia, (in press).
46.
JeewajeeA., LeverC., BurtonS., O'KeefeJ., & BurgessN. (2008). Environmental novelty is signaled by reduction of the hippocampal theta frequency. Hippocampus, 18, 340–348.
47.
KaganJ. (2002). Surprise, uncertainty, and mental structures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
KeizerA. W., ColzatoL. S., & HommelB. (2008). Integrating faces, houses, motion, and action: Spontaneous binding across ventral and dorsal processing streams. Acta Physologia (Amst), 127, 177–185.
49.
KliethermesC. L., & CrabbeJ. C. (2006). Genetic independence of mouse measures of some aspects of novelty seeking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103, 5018–5023.
50.
KohlerS., DanckertS., GatiJ. S., & MenonR. S. (2005). Novelty responses to relational and non-relational information in the hippocampus and the parahippocampal region: A comparison based on event-related fMRI. Hippocampus, 15, 763–774.
51.
KoivistoM., LahteenmakiM., SorensenT. A., VangkildeS., OvergaardM., & RevonsuoA. (2008). The earliest electrophysiological correlate of visual awareness?Brain and Cognition, 66, 91–103.
52.
KonenC. S., & KastnerS. (2008). Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 224–231.
53.
KumaranD. (2008). Short-term memory and the human hippocampus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 3837–3838.
54.
KumaranD., & MaguireE. A. (2007). Match-mismatch processes underlie human hippocampal responses to associative novelty. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 8517–8524.
55.
KushnerenkoE., WinklerI., HorvathJ., NaatanenR., PavlovI., FellmanV., & HuotilainenM. (2007). Processing acoustic change and novelty in newborn infants. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 265–274.
56.
KveragaK., GhumanA. S., & BarM. (2007). Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain. Brain and Cognition, 65, 145–168.
57.
LangS., & KotchoubeyB. (2002). Brain responses to number sequence with and without active task requirement. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1734–1741.
58.
LargeM. E., Cavina-PratesiC., VilisT., & CulhamJ. C. (2008). The neural correlates of change detection in the face perception network. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2169–2176.
59.
LeeC. L., & FedermeierK. D. (2008). To watch, to see, and to differ: An event-related potential study of concreteness effects as a function of word class and lexical ambiguity. Brain and Language, 104, 145–158.
60.
LeeH. J., YounJ. M., GallagherM., & HollandP. C. (2008). Temporally limited role of substantia nigra-central amygdala connections in surprise-induced enhancement of learning. European Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 3043–3049.
61.
LehkyS. R., & SerenoA. B. (2007). Comparison of shape encoding in primate dorsal and ventral visual pathways. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 307–319.
62.
LeppanenJ. M., HietanenJ. K., & KoskinenK. (2008). Differential early ERPs to fearful versus neutral facial expressions: A response to the salience of the eyes?Biological Psychology, 78, 150–158.
63.
LiljestromM., TarkiainenA., ParviainenT., KujalaJ., NumminenJ., HitunenJ., LaineM., (2008). Perceiving and naming actions and objects. Neuroimage, 41, 1132–1141.
64.
LockheadG. R. (2004). Absolute judgments are relative: A reinterpretation of some psychophysical ideas. Review of General Psychology, 8, 265–272.
MatsumotoM., MatsumotoK., & TanakaK. (2007b). Effects of novelty on activity of lateral and medial prefrontal neurons. Neuroscience Research, 57, 268–276.
67.
McCaugheyS. A. (2008). The taste of sugars. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 1024–1043.
68.
MendesW. B., BlascovichJ., HunterS. B., LickelB., & JostJ. T. (2007). Threatened by the unexpected: Physiological responses during social interactions with expectancy-violating partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 698–716.
69.
MignaultA., MarleyA. A. J., & ChaudhuriA. (2008). Inverted-U- effects generalize to the judgment of subjective properties of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 70, 1274–1288.
70.
MontaldiD., SpencerT. J., RobertsN., & MayesA. R. (2006). The neural system that mediates familiarity memory. Hippocampus, 16, 504–520.
71.
NishijoH., OnoT., & NishinoH. (1988). Topographic distribution of modality- specific amygdalar neurons in alert monkey. The Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 3556–3569.
72.
Op de BeeckH. P., DeutschJ. A., VanduffelW., KanwisherN. G., & DiCarloJ. J. (2008). A stable topography of selectivity for unfamiliar shape classes in monkey inferior temporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1676–1694.
73.
O'KaneG., InslerR. Z., & WagnerA. D. (2005). Conceptual and perceptual novelty effects in human medial temporal cortex. Hippocampus, 15, 326–332.
74.
PankanenL. M., HietanenJ. K., PeltolaM. J., KauppinenP. K., HaapalainenA., & LeppanenJ. M. (2008). Facing a real person: An event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 19, 497–501.
75.
PaulsenD. J., & NevilleH. J. (2008). The processing of non-symbolic numerical magnitudes as indexed by ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2532–2544.
76.
PelphreyK. A., ReznickJ. S., GoldmanB. D., SassonN., MorrowJ., DonahueA., & HodgsonK. (2004). Development of visuo-spatial short-term memory in the second half of the first year. Developmental Psychology, 40, 836–851.
77.
PetridesM., AlivisatosB., & FreyS. (2002). Differential activation of the human orbital, mid-ventrolateral, and mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during the processing of visual stimuli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99, 5649–5654.
78.
PlaillyJ., TillmannB., & RoyetJ. P. (2007). The feeling of familiarity of music and odors: The same neural signature?Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2650–2658.
79.
PoppenkJ., WaliaG., McIntoshA. R., JoanisseM. F., KleinD., & KohlerS. (2008). Why is the meaning of a sentence better remembered than its form? An fMRI study on the role of novelty-encoding processes. Hippocampus, (in press).
80.
QuinlanD. J., & CulhamJ. C. (2007). fMRI reveals a preference for near viewing in the human parieto-occipital cortex. Neuroimage, 36, 167–187.
81.
RanganathC., & RainerG. (2003). Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 193–202.
82.
RedgraveP., GurneyK., & ReynoldsJ. (2008). What is reinforced by phasic dopamine signals?Brain Research Reviews, 58, 322–339.
83.
Reuven-MagrilD., DarR., & LibermanN. (2008). Illusion of control and behavioral control attempts in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 334–341.
84.
RoT. (2008). Unconscious vision in action. Neuropsychologia, 46, 379–383.
85.
RoitmanM. F., van DijkG., ThieleT. E., & BernsteinI. L. (2001). Dopamine mediation of the feeding response to violations of spatial and temporal expectancies. Behavioral Brain Research, 122, 193–199.
86.
RoseS. A., FeldmanJ. F., & JankowskiJ. J. (2002). Processing speed in the first year of life: A longitudinal study of preterm and full-term infants. Developmental Psychology, 38, 895–902.
87.
RozinP., RozinR., AppelB., & WachtelC. (2006). Documenting and explaining the common AAB pattern in music and humor: Establishing and breaking expectations. Emotion, 6, 349–355.
88.
RubyP., CaclinA., BouletS., DelpuechC., & MorletD. (2008). Odd sound processing in the sleeping brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 296–311.
89.
SambethA., HuotilainenM., KushnerenkoE., FellmanV., & PihkoE. (2006). Newborns discriminate novel from harmonic sounds: A study using magnetoencephalography. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 496–503.
90.
SchererK. R., ZentnerM. R., & SternD. (2004). Beyond surprise: The puzzle of infants’ expressive reactions to expectancy. Emotion, 4, 389–402.
91.
SchmidN. B., ForsythJ. P., SantiagoH. T., & TrakowskiJ. H. (2002)., Classification of panic attack subtypes in patients and normal controls in response to biological challenge. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 16, 625–638.
92.
SchnuppJ. W. H., & KingA. J. (2008). Auditory neuroscience: Neuronal sensitivity in humans. Current Biology, 18, R382–R385.
93.
SchreijD., OwensC., & TheeuwesJ. (2008). Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings. Perception and Psychophysics, 70, 208–218.
94.
SchultzW. (1998). Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 1–27.
95.
SchultzW., PreuschoffK., CamererC., HsuM., FiorilloC. D., ToblerP. N., & BossaertsP. (2008). Review. Explicit neural signals reflecting reward uncertainty. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society London B Biological Sciences, (in press).
96.
SearleJ. (2003). Putting consciousness back in the brain. In BennettM., DennettD., HackerP., and SearleJ.. Neuroscience and Philosophy, pp. 97–124. New York: Columbia University Press.
97.
ShethA., BerrettaS., LangeN., & EichenbaumH. (2008). The amygdala modulates neuronal activation in the hippocampus in response to spatial novelty. Hippocampus, 18, 169–181.
98.
SmithC. N., & SquireL. R. (2008). Experience-dependent eye movements reflect hippocampus-dependent (aware) memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 12825–12833.
99.
SnyderK. A., & KeilA. (2008). Repetition suppression of induced gamma activity predicts enhanced orienting toward a novel stimulus in 6-month-old infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, (in press).
100.
SridharanD., LevitinD. J., ChafeC. H., BergerJ., & MenonV. (2007). Neural dynamics of event segmentation in music: Converging evidence for dissociable ventral and dorsal networks. Neuron, 55, 521–532.
101.
StuttgenM. C., & SchwarzC. (2008). Psychophysical and neurometric detection performance under stimulus uncertainty. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1091–1099.
102.
SuchanB., PickenhagenA., & DaumI. (2005). Effect of working memory on evaluation-related frontocentral negativity. Behavioiral Brain Research, 160, 331–337.
TalsmaD., KokA., SlagterH. A., & CiprianiG. (2008). Attentional orienting across the sensory modalities. Brain and Cognition, 66, 1–10.
105.
TatlerB. W., & MelcherD. (2007). Pictures in mind: Initial encoding of object properties varies with the realism of the scene stimulus. Perception, 36, 1715–1729.
106.
WhalenP. J. (1998). Fear, vigilance, and ambiguity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 177–187.
107.
WimsattW. C. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
108.
WittmanB. C., BunzeckN., DolanR. J., & DuzelE. (2007). Anticipation of novelty recruits reward system and hippocampus while promoting recollection. Neuroimage, 38, 194–202.
109.
WittmannB. C., DawN. D., SeymourB., & DolanR. J. (2008). Striatal activity underlies novelty-based choice in humans. Neuron, 58, 967–973.
110.
XuY., & ChunM. M. (2007). Visual grasping in human parietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 18766–18771.
111.
YacoubE., HarelN., & UgurbilK. (2008). High-field fMRI unveils orientation columns in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 10607–10612.
112.
YamaguchiS., HaleL. A., D'EspositoM., & KnightR. T. (2004). Rapid prefrontal- hippocampal habituation to novel events. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 5356–5363.
113.
YotoA., KatsuuraT., IwanagaK., & ShimomuraY. (2007). Effects of object color stimuli on human brain activities in perception and attention referred to EEG alpha band response. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 26, 373–379.
114.
ZeilJ., BoeddekerN., & HemmiJ. M. (2008). Vision and the organization of behavior. Current Biology, 18, R320–R323.
115.
ZellnerD. A., AllenD., HenleyM., & ParkerS. (2006). Hedonic contrast and condensation: Good stimuli make mediocre stimuli less good and less different. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 235–239.
