This exploratory study sought to differentiate 24 delinquent, 30 at-risk and 30 not at-risk adolescent males according to a multidimensional model of self-concept. Participants completed the Song and Hattie Test of Self-Concept (1992), which consists of seven dimensions of self-concept; namely, achievement self-concept, ability self-concept, classroom self-concept, family self-concept, peer self-concept, physical self-concept and confidence in self.
Significant differences between the not at-risk, at-risk and delinquent groups were found across six of the seven dimensions of self-concept. Implications of these findings suggest an effective procedure for differentiating between not at-risk and at-risk youth within the school context, prior to involvement with the Juvenile Justice system. The implications for intervention are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BowersL., SmithP. K., & BinneyV. (1992). Cohesion and power in the families of children involved in bully/victim problems at school. Journal of Family Therapy, 14, 371–387.
2.
CapaldiD. M., & PattersonG. R. (1996). Can violent offenders be distinguished from frequent offenders: Predictions from childhood to adolescence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33(2), 206–231.
3.
CarrollA. (1994) The development of delinquency: Integrating reputation enhancement theory and goal setting theory. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Western Australia, Perth.
4.
CarrollA., DurkinK., HattieJ., & HoughtonS. (1997). Goal setting among adolescents: A comparison of delinquent, at-risk and not-at-risk youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 441–450.
5.
CoxR.P. (1996). An exploration of the demographic and social correlates of criminal behaviour among adolescent males. Journal of Adolescent Health, 19, 17–24.
6.
ElmerN. (1990). A social psychology of reputation. In StroebeW. & HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of Social Psychology, (Vol. 1.)Chichester: Wiley.
7.
ElmerN., & ReicherS. (1995). Adolescents and Delinquency. Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
FarringtonD. P. (1990). Implications of criminal career research for the prevention of offending. Journal of Adolescence, 13, 93–113.
9.
FarringtonD. P., & WestD. J. (1990). The Cambridge Study in delinquent development: A long-term follow-up of 411 London males. In KernerH. J. & KaiserG. (Eds.), Criminality: Personality, Behaviour, Life History (pp. 115–138). Berlin: Springger – Verlag.
10.
FernandezM. R. (1999). Narrative Therapy in practice: A “storied” approach to building mental health resiliency in adolescents. The Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 9 (2), 147–162.
11.
HattieJ. (1992). Self-Concept. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
HoughtonS., & CarrollA. (1996). Enhancing reputations: The effective use of behaviour modification strategies by high school adolescent males. Scientia Pedagogica Experimentalis, XXXIII (2), 227–244.
13.
LorinR. P., TolanP. H., & WahlerR. G. (1987). Prevention. In QuayH. C. (Ed.), Handbook of Juvenile Delinquency (pp. 383–416). New York: John Wiley.
14.
MarkusH., & WurfE. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.
15.
MiskiminsR. W. (1972). Miskimins Self-Goal-Other Discrepancy Scale II. Fort Collins, Colorado: Rocky Mountain Behavioural Science Institute.
16.
OdgersP., HoughtonS., & DouglasG. (1996). Reputation enhancement theory and adolescent substance abuse. Journal of Childhood Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(8), 1015–1022.
17.
PattersonG., ReidJ. B., & DishionT. J. (1992). A Social Interactional Approach: Antisocial Boys. Eugene, Oregon: Castalia Publishing Company
18.
RecklessW. C., DinitzS., & MurrayE. (1956). Self-concept as an insulator against delinquency. American Sociological Review, 21, 744–746.
19.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
20.
SafyerA. W., HauserS. T., JacobsonA. M., BlissR., HerskowitzR. D., WolfsdorfJ. I., & WertliebD. 91993). The impact of the family on diabetes adjustment: A developmental perspective. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 10(2), 123–140.
21.
ShavelsonR. J., & BolusR. (1982). Self-Concept: The interplay of theory and methods. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 233–241.
22.
SpellacyF. J., & BrownW. G. (1984). Prediction of recidivism in young offenders after brief institutionalisation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40 (4), 1070–7074.
23.
StattinH., & MagnussonD. (1995). Onset of official delinquency. British Journal of Criminology, 35 (3), 417–449.
24.
VazsonyiA. T., & FlanneryD. J. (1997). Early adolescent delinquent behaviours: Associations with family and school domains. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17(3), 271–293.
25.
Western Australian Legislative Assembly. (1992). The Final Report of the Select Committee on Youth Affairs. Perth: Office of the Clerk of the Legislative Assembly.
26.
WithersG., & BattenM. (1995). Programs for At-Risk Youth. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
27.
ZiemanG. L., & BensonG. P. (1993). Delinquency: The role of self-esteem and social values. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12(6), 489–500.
