Parents have the right to participate in the educational planning for their child with a disability, however they often need assistance when interacting with professionals to ensure the best programs for their children. Professionals also require guidelines and opportunities to develop appropriate communication skills when interacting with other professionals and parents. This paper investigates the level of participatory decision-making which exists between parents and professionals, and professionals amongst themselves. The present thrust for including children with a disability in mainstream schools is used as the contextual setting for this investigation. Furthermore, the author presents an intervention plan based on the Collaborative Consultation Model to enhance the participatory decision-making skills of parents and professionals at the local school level.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbesonA., & WeintraubF. (1977). Understanding the Individual Educational Program. In TorrisS., (Ed.), A primer on individualized education for handicapped children. Va.: Foundation for Exceptional Children.
2.
BallD.W. (1979). Language as a means of social power: Theoretical-empirical explanations of language and language use embedded in a social matrix. In RommetveitR. & BlakerR.M., (Eds), Studies of language, thought and verbal communication. New York: Academic Press.
3.
BeareH. (1974). Community and parent involvement and participation in education. Educational Magazine, 41, 2.
4.
BeattieN. (1985). Professional parents. Lewes: Falmer Press.
5.
BermanP., & McLaughlinM.W. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change: Factors affecting implementation and continuation. Volume 7. Santa Monica, California: Rand.
6.
BlackburnJ. (1985). (Chairperson) Ministerial Review of Postcompulsory Schooling Report, Vol. 1. Melbourne: Ministerial review of postcompulsory schooling.
7.
BlauP.M., & ScottW.R. (1962). Formal organizations: A comparative approach. San Francisco: Chandler.
8.
BossardM.D., & GutkinT.B. (1983). The relationship of consultant skill and school organisational characteristics with teacher use of school based consultation service. School Psychology Review, 12, 50–56.
9.
BowdA. (1986). Exceptional children in classes. North Melbourne: Hargreen Publishing Company.
10.
BrownJ., CahirP., & ReeveP. (1987). The educational rationale for parent participation. Unicorn, 13(4), 195–201.
ChinR., & BenneK.O. (1976). General strategies for effecting changes in human systems. In BennisW., The planning of change. 3rd Edition. New York,: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
DerrC.B. & DealT.E. (1979). Toward a contingency theory of change in education: Organisational structure, processes and symbolism. In KingE. (Ed.), Education of uncertainty. London: Sage.
15.
EveretsJ.F. (1987). Developing the high school's guidance network to cater for students with special needs. The Exceptional Child, 34(2), 107–115.
16.
FitzgeraldR.T. (1976). Poverty and education in Australia. Fifth Main Report, Commission of Enquiry into Poverty, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services.
17.
FitzgeraldR., MusgraveP., & PettitP. (1976). Studies in community participation. Victorian Community Council.
18.
ForesterJ. (1980). Listening: The social policy of everyday life (critical theory and hermeneutics in practice). Social Praxis, 7, 219–232.
19.
GoldsteinS., StricklandB., TurnbullA.P., & CurryL. (1980). An observational analysis of the IEP Conference. Exceptional Children, 46(4), 278–286.
20.
GowL. (1986). Views on integration: Report to the Commonwealth School's Commission on Integration in Australia: Volume 2.
21.
GronnP. (1983). Talk as the work: The accomplishment of school administration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 1–21.
22.
HannanB. (1985). Democratic curriculum. Melbourne: Allen and Unwin.
23.
HardS.M., HaulingL.L., & StiegelbauerS.M. (1983). An analysis of interventions in school improvemen t efforts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
24.
HodgkinsonC. (1978). Towards a philosophy of administration. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
25.
HuntJ. (1980). The curriculum and the community. Occasional Paper No. 5. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.
JohnsonG.P. (1962). Special education for the mentally retarded: A paradox. Exceptional Children, 29, 62–69.
28.
KarmelP.H. (1973). Schools in Australia: Report of the Interim Committee for the Australian Schools Commission. Government Printer.
29.
KeevesJ.P. (1982). Education and change in South Australia: Report of the Committee of Enquiry into Education in South Australia. Adelaide: Government Printer.
30.
KouzesJ.M., & MicoP.R. (1976). The integration of services is a process, not a product. (Technical Report). San Jose: Joint Centre for Human Resources Development, San Jose State University.
31.
KrothR. (1975). Communicating with parents of exceptional children: Improving parent-teacher relationships. Denver, Colo.: Love.
32.
LictaJ.W. (1975). Is the principal an effective change agent?NASSP Bulletin, December, 75–81.
33.
MacMillanD.L., JonesR.L., & AloiaG.F. (1975). The mentally retarded label: A theoretical analysis and review of research. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 241–261.
34.
MacphersonR.J.S. (1989). Coursework papers: School organization and development. University of New England, Armidale.
35.
MaherC.A. (1983). Development and implementation of effective educational programs (IEPs): Evaluation of two approaches. Journal of School Psychology, 21, 143–152.
36.
MarshC. (1988). Spotlight on school improvement. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
37.
MarshC.E., PriceB.J., & SmithT.E.C. (1983). Teaching mildly handicapped children: Methods and materials. St Louis, Mo.: C.V. Mosby.
38.
McAllenI.M. (1978). The parent, teacher, and child as conference partners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 10(4), 103–105.
39.
MeadeP. (1987). The Practising Administrator. 9(2), 36–39.
40.
MitchellD. (1987). Special education in New Zealand: An historical perspective. In MitchellD., & SinghN. (Eds), Exceptional children in New Zealand. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
41.
PettieJ. (1980). Strategies and educational change: The Victorian school debate. School and Community News, 4, 1–7.
42.
PettitD. (1986). Community involvement and decision making in schools. Burwood State College Schools. Commission Report.
43.
PocockJ.G. (1973). Politics, language and time. London: Methuen.
PugachM.C. (1982). Regular classroom teacher involvement in the development and utilisation of IEPs. Exceptional Children, 48(4), 371–374.
46.
RutterM. (1982). School effects on children's progress: Research findings and policy implications. Paper prepared for the National Institute of Education, US Department of Education, February.
47.
SchonD.A. (1971). Beyond the stable state. New York: Norton.
48.
SchultzL.R. (1982). Educating the special needs student in the regular classroom. Exceptional Children, 48(4), 366–368.
49.
SonnenscheinP. (1981). Parents and professionals: An uneasy relationship. Teaching Exceptional Children, 14(2), 62–65.
50.
SpierM.S. (1973). Kurt Lewin's Force Field Analysis In JonesJ.E. & PfeifferJ.W., Annual handbook of group facilitators. San Diego: University Associate.
51.
WalbergJ.H. (1983). Scientific and literacy and economic productivity in international perspective. Daedalus, Spring, 1–28.
52.
WeintraubF.B., AbesonA., BallardJ., & La VorM.L. (1976). Public policy and the education of exceptional children. Reston, Va.: Council for Exceptional Children.
