AltC.D.EngelmannD.SchenkJ.P., 2006. Quality control of thoracic X-rays in children in diagnostic centers with and without pediatric-radiologic competence. Fortschr Rontgenstr178, 191–199.
2.
American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 1998. Managing the Use of Fluoroscopy in Medical Institutions. AAPM Report No. 58. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI.
3.
American College of Radiology, 1996. ACR Appropriateness Criteria, Reston, VA. Available at: http://www.acr.org/ac (last accessed 07.11.12).
4.
AmisE.S.ButlerP.F.ApplegateK.E., 2007. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J. Am. Coll. Radiol.4, 272–284.
5.
BalterS.HopewellJ.W.MillerD.L., 2010. Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: A review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair. Radiology254, 326–341.
6.
BardoD.M.E.BlackM.SchenkK., 2009. Location of the ovaries in girls from newborn to 18 years of age: Reconsidering ovarian shielding. Pediatr. Radiol.39, 253–259.
7.
de GonzalezBerrington A.MaheshM.KimK.P., 2009. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch. Intern. Med.169, 2071–2077.
8.
BooneJ.M.GeraghtyE.M.SeibertJ.A., 2003. Dose reduction in pediatric CT: A rational approach. Radiology228, 352–360.
9.
BrennerD.HallE., 2007. Computed tomography — An increasing source of radiation exposure. N. Engl. J. Med.357, 2277–2284.
10.
BrisseH.J.AubertB., 2009. CT exposure from pediatric MDCT: Results from the 2007–2008 SFIPP/ISRN survey. J. Radiol.90, 207–215.
11.
BulsN.BosmansH.MommaertC., 2010. CT paediatric doses in Belgium: A multi-center study: Results of a dosimetry audit 2007–2009. Available at: http://www.fanc.fgov.be/GED/00000000/2400/2449.pdf (last accessed 08.11.12).
12.
CodyD.D.MoxleyD.M.KrughK.T., 2004. Strategies for formulating appropriate MDCT techniques when imaging the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in pediatric patients. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.182, 849–859.
13.
ColomboP.PedroliG.NicolosoM., 2004. Evaluation of the efficacy of a bismuth shield during CT examinations. Radiol. Med.108, 560–568.
14.
ConnollyB.RacadioJ.TowbinR., 2006. Practice of ALARA in the pediatric interventional suite. Pediatr. Radiol.36 (Suppl. 14), 163–167.
15.
CookJ.V.KyriouJ.C.PettetA., 2001. Key factors in the optimization of paediatric X-ray practice. Br. J. Radiol.74, 1032–1040.
16.
CourseyC.FrushD.P.YoshizumiT., 2008. Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: Effect of radiation dose with breast shielding. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.190, W54–W61.
17.
DauerL.T.CasciottaK.A.RothenbergL.N., 2007. Radiation dose reduction at a price: The effectiveness of a male gonadal shield during helical CT scans. BMC Med. Imaging7, 5.
18.
DauerL.T.St. GermainJ.MeyersP.A., 2008. Letter to the Editor — Let's image gently: Reducing excessive reliance on CT scans. Pediatr. Blood Cancer51, 838.
19.
DixonR.L.BallardA.C., 2007. Experimental validation of a versatile system of CT dosimetry using a conventional ion chamber: Beyond CTDI100. Med. Phys.34, 3399–3413.
20.
DonnellyL.F.EmeryK.H.BrodyA.S., 2001. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: Strategies at a large children's hospital. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.176, 303–306.
21.
EderH.PanzerW.SchoferH., 2005. Is the lead-equivalent suited for rating protection properties of lead-free radiation protective clothing?Fortschr Rontgenstr177, 399–404.
22.
European Commission, 1996. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images in Paediatrics. European Commission, Brussels.
23.
European Commission, 1999. Guidance on Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for Medical Exposures. European Commission Publications, Radiation Protection 109, Brussels.
24.
European Commission, 2000. European Guidelines for Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography. European Commission, Luxembourg.
25.
FawcettS.L.BarterS.J., 2009. The use of gonad shielding in paediatric hip and pelvis radiographs. Br. J. Radiol.82, 363–370.
26.
FendelH.SchneiderK.KohnM.M.BakowskiC., 1989. Optimization of image quality and patient dose — Paediatric radiology. In: MooresB.M.WallB.F.EriskatH.SchibillaH. (Eds.), Optimization of Image Quality and Patient Exposure in Diagnostic Radiology. BIR Report 20. British Institute of Radiology, pp. 91–101.
27.
FrushD.P.SodenB.FrushK.S., 2002. Improved pediatric multidetector body CT using a size-based color-coded format. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.178, 721–726.
GeleijnsJ.ArtellsSalvado M.VeldkampW.J., 2006. Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality. Eur. Radiol.16, 2334–2340.
30.
GreessH.NömayrA.WolfH., 2002. Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose). Eur. Radiol.12, 1571–1576.
31.
GreessH.LutzeJ.NömayrA., 2004. Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur. Radiol.14, 995–999.
HartD.WallB.F.ShrimptonP.C., 2000. Reference Doses and Patient Size in Paediatric Radiology. NRPB-R318. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton.
34.
HartD.HillierM.C.WallB.F., 2007. Doses to Patients from Radiographic and Fluoroscopic X-ray Imaging Procedures in the UK — 2005 Review. HPA-RPD-029. UK Health Protection Agency, Chilton.
35.
HayashiN.SakaiT.KitagawaM., 1998. Radiation exposure to interventional radiologists during manual-injection digital subtraction angiography. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol.21, 240–243.
36.
HiornsM.P.SainiA.MarsdenP.J., 2006. A review of current local dose-area product levels for paediatric fluoroscopy in a tertiary referral centre compared with national standards. Why are they so different?. Br. J. Radiol.79, 326–330.
37.
HorwitzA.E.Schweighofer-BerberishK.SchneiderK., 1993. Selected image quality parameters in a survey using a test phantom in radiological departments and offices in the Federal Republic of Germany. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry49, 79–82.
38.
HudaW.ScalzettiE.M.LevinG., 2000. Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology217, 430–435.
39.
IAEA, 2007. Diagnostic Radiology: an International Code of Practice. Technical Report Series No. 457. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
40.
ICRP, 2000a. Pregnancy and medical radiation. ICRP Publication 84. Ann. ICRP 30(1).
41.
ICRP, 2000b. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. ICRP Publication 87. Ann. ICRP 30(4).
42.
ICRP, 2001a. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. ICRP Publication 85. Ann. ICRP 30(2).
43.
ICRP, 2001b. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. ICRP Publication 87. Ann. ICRP 30(4).
44.
ICRP, 2003. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE), quality factor (Q), and radiation weighting factor (WR). ICRP Publication 92. Ann. ICRP 33(4).
45.
ICRP, 2004. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. ICRP Publication 93. Ann. ICRP 34(1).
46.
ICRP, 2005. Low-dose extrapolation of radiation-related cancer risk. ICRP Publication 99. Ann. ICRP 35(4).
47.
ICRP, 2007a. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography. ICRP Publication 102. Ann. ICRP 37(1).
48.
ICRP, 2007b. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37(2–4).
49.
ICRU, 2005. Patient dosimetry for x rays used in medical imaging. ICRU Report 74. J. ICRU 5(2).
50.
International Electrotechnical Commission, 2002. Medical Electrical Equipment — Part 2–44: Particular Requirements for the Safety of X-ray Equipment for Computed Tomography. International Standard IEC 60601-2-44 Edition 2.1. IEC, Geneva.
51.
IPEM, 2005. Recommended Standards for the Routine Performance Testing of Diagnostic X-ray Imaging Systems. IPEM Report 91. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, York.
52.
JimenezS.JimenezJ.R.CrespoM., 2006. Computed tomography in children with cystic fibrosis: A new way to reduce radiation dose. Arch. Dis. Child.91, 388–390.
53.
JohnsonK.WilliamsS.C.BalogunM., 2004. Reducing unnecessary skull radiographs in children: A multidisciplinary audit. Clin. Radiol.59, 616–620.
54.
KalraM.K.DangP.SinghS., 2009. In-plane shielding for CT: Effect of off-centering, automatic exposure control and shield-to-surface distance. Korean J. Radiol.10, 156–163.
55.
KarmazynB.FrushD.P.ApplegateK.E., 2009. CT with a computer-simulated dose reduction technique for detection of pediatric nephroureterolithiasis: Comparison of standard and reduced radiation doses. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.192, 143–149.
56.
KimS.FrushD.P.YoshizumiT.T., 2010. Bismuth shielding in CT: Support for use in children. Pediatr. Radiol.40, 1739–1742.
57.
KingJ.N.ChamplinA.M.KelseyC.A., 2002. Using a sterile disposable protective surgical drape for reduction of radiation exposure to interventionalists. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.178, 153–157.
58.
KuppermannN.HolmesJ.F.DayanP.S., 2009. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: A prospective cohort study. Lancet374, 1160–1170.
59.
LedermanH.M.KhademianZ.P.FeliceM., 2002. Dose reduction fluoroscopy in pediatrics. Pediatr. Radiol.32, 844–848.
LewisD.W.DorbadD., 2000. The utility of neuroimaging in the evaluation of children with migraine or chronic daily headache who have normal neurological examinations. Headache40, 629–632.
62.
LucayaJ.PiquerasJ.García-PenñaP., 2000. Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: Dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.175, 985–992.
63.
MaytalJ.KraussJ.M.NovakG., 2000. The role of brain computed tomography in evaluating children with new onset of seizures in the emergency department. Epilepsia41, 950–954.
64.
McCartyM.WaughR.McCallumH., 2001. Paediatric pelvic imaging: Improvement in gonad shield placement by multidisciplinary audit. Pediatr. Radiol.31, 646–649.
65.
MacGregorD.M.McKieL., 2005. CT or nor CT — That is the question. Whether 'tis better to evaluate clinically and x ray than to undertake a CT head scan. Emerg. Med. J.22, 541–543.
66.
MossM.McLeanD., 2006. Paediatric and adult computed tomography practice and patient dose in Australia. Australas. Radiol.50, 33–40.
67.
NAS/NRC, 2006. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionising Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Board on Radiation Effects Research. National Research Council of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
O'ConnerO.J.VandeleurM.McGarrigleA.M., 2010. Development of low-dose protocols for thin-section CT assessment of cystic fibrosis in pediatric patients. Radiology257, 820–829.
70.
PagesJ.BulsN.OsteauxM., 2003. CT doses in children: A multicentre study. Br. J. Radiol.76, 803–811.
71.
PerlmutterN.ArthurR.BeluffiG., 1998. The quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in paediatrics. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry80, 45–48.
Royal College of Radiologists, 2007. Making the Best Use of Clinical Radiology Services, sixth ed.Royal College of Radiologists, London.
77.
JacobSanchez R.Vano-GalvanE.RuizGomez M., 2009. Optimising the use of computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging. J. Digit. Imaging22, 104–113.
78.
SchneiderK.FendelH.BakawskiC., 1992. Results of a dosimetry study in the European Community on frequent x-ray examinations in infants. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry43, 31–36.
79.
SchneiderK.KohnM.M.BakowskiC., 1993. Impact of radiographic imaging criteria on dose and image quality in infants in an EC-wide survey. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry49, 73–76.
80.
SchneiderK., 1995. Evolution of quality assurance in paediatric radiology. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry57, 119–123.
81.
SchneiderK.KohnM.M.ErnstG., 1998. The derivation of reference dose values to chest X-rays in paediatric radiography. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry80, 199–202.
82.
SchneiderK.PerlmutterN.ArthurR., 2000. Micturition cysturethrography in paediatric patients in selected children's hospitals in Europe: Evaluation of fluoroscopy technique, image quality criteria and dose. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry90, 197–201.
83.
ShrimptonP.C.HillierM.S.LewisM.A., 2005. Doses from Computed Tomography (CT) Examinations in the UK — 2003 Review. NRPB-67. Available at: www.hpa.org.uk/radiation.publication/index.htm (last accessed 10.01.11).
84.
StraussK.J.GoskeM.J.KasteS.C., 2010. Image gently: Ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.194, 868–873.
85.
TeasdaleG.M.MurrayG.AndersonE., 1990. Risks of acute traumatic intracranial haematoma in children and adults: Implications for managing head injuries. BMJ300, 363–367.
86.
ThomasK.E., 2011. CT utilization — Trends and developments beyond the United States' borders. Pediatr. Radiol.41 (Suppl. 2), S562–S566.
87.
ThomtonF.J.PaulsonE.K.YoshizumiT.T., 2003. Single versus multi-detector row CT: Comparison of radiation doses and dose profiles. Acad. Radiol.10, 379–385.
88.
ThorntonR.H.DauerL.T.AltamiranoJ.P., 2010. Comparing strategies for operator eye protection in the interventional radiology suite. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol.21, 1073–1077.
89.
TsapakiV., 2001. Patient and staff dosimetry problems in interventional radiology. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry94, 113–116.
90.
UNSCEAR, 2008. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, UNSCEAR 2008 Report: Volume I: Sources — Report to the General Assembly Scientific Annexes A and B, United Nations, New York.
91.
VanñóE.FernandezJ.M.TenJ.I., 2007. Transition from screen-film to digital radiography: Evolution of patient radiation doses at projection radiography. Radiology243, 461–466.
92.
VanñóE.MartinezD.FernandezJ.M., 2008. Paediatric entrance doses from exposure index in computed radiography. Phys. Med. Biol.53, 3365–3380.
93.
ValkJ.W.PlotzF.B.SchuermanF.A., 2001. The value of routine chest radiographs in a paediatric intensive care unit: A prospective study. Pediatr. Radiol.31, 343–347.
94.
VerdunF.R.LeporiD.MonninP., 2004. Management of patient dose and image noise in routine pediatric CT abdominal examinations. Eur. Radiol.14, 835–841.
95.
VerdunF.R.GutierrezD.VaderJ.P., 2008. CT radiation dose in children: A survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland. Eur. Radiol.18, 1980–1986.
96.
VockP., 2005. CT dose reduction in children. Eur. Radiol.15, 2330–2340.
97.
WardV.L.BarnewoltC.E.StraussK.J., 2006. Radiation exposure reduction during voiding cystourethrography in a pediatric porcine model of vesicourethral reflux. Radiology238, 96–106.
98.
WillisC.E.SlovisT.L., 2004. The ALARA concept in pediatric CR and DR: Dose reduction in pediatric radiographic exams — A white paper conference executive summary. Pediatr. Radiol.34 (Suppl. 3), S162–S164.
99.
YakoumakisE.KarlatiraM.GialousisG., 2009. Effective dose variation in pediatric computed tomography: Dose reference levels in Greece. Health Phys.97, 595–603.
100.
YuL.BruesewitzM.R.ThomasK.B., 2011. Optimal tube potential for radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT: Principles, clinical implementations, and pitfalls. Radiographics31, 835–848.