AlaeiP.HigginsP.D.GerbiB.J., 2009. In vivo diode dosimetry for IMRT
treatments generated by Pinnacle treatment planning system.
Med. Dosim. 34,
26–29.
2.
AlfonsoR.AndreoP.CapoteR., 2008. A new formalism for reference
dosimetry of small and nonstandard fields. Med.
Phys. 35,
5179–5186.
3.
CahlonO.HuntM.ZelefskyM.J., 2008. Intensity-modulated radiation
therapy: supportive data for prostate cancer. Semin.
Radiat. Oncol. 18,
48–57.
4.
EngströmP.E.HaraldssonP.LandbergT.HansenH.S.EngelholmS.A.NyströmH., 2005. In vivo dose verification of IMRT
treated head and neck cancer patients. Acta
Oncol. 44,
572–578.
5.
FaddegonB.A.GardeE., 2006. A pulse-rate dependence of dose
per monitor unit and its significant effect on wedge-shaped fields delivered with
variable dose rate and a moving jaw. Med. Phys.
33, 3063–3065.
6.
FraassB.A., 2008. QA issues for computer-controlled
treatment delivery: this is not your old R/V system any more!Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 71
(Suppl.),
S98–S102.
7.
FraassB.DoppkeK.HuntM., 1998a. American Association of
Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality
assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning.
Med. Phys. 25,
1773–1829.
8.
FraassB.A.LashK.L.MatroneG.M., 1998b. The impact of treatment
complexity and computer-control delivery technology on treatment delivery
errors. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.
42, 651–659.
9.
GoldweinJ.W.PodmaniczkyK.C.MacklisR.M., 2003. Radiotherapeutic errors and
computerized record/verify systems. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol.
Biol. Phys. 57,
1509–10.
10.
HigginsP.D.AlaeiP.GerbiB.J.DusenberyK.E., 2003. In vivo diode dosimetry for
routine quality assurance in IMRT. Med. Phys.
30, 3118–3123.
11.
HuangG.MedlamG.LeeJ., 2005. Error in the delivery of radiation
therapy: results of a quality assurance review. Int. J.
Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 61,
1590–1595.
12.
IAEA, 1996. International
Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the
Safety of Radiation Sources. Safety series No. 115. Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Atomic Energy
Agency, International Labour Organization, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Pan
American Health Organization, World Health Organization, International Atomic
Energy Agency,
Vienna.
13.
IAEA, 2001. Investigation
of an Accidental Exposure of Radiotherapy Patients in Panamá.
International Atomic Energy Agency,
Vienna.
14.
IAEA, 2004. Commissioning
and Quality Assurance of Computerized Planning Systems for Radiation Therapy of
Cancer. IAEA TRS-430. International Atomic Energy
Agency, Vienna.
15.
IAEA, 2008. Design and
Implementation of a Radiotherapy Programme: Clinical, Medical Physics, Radiation
Protection and Safety Aspects. International Atomic
Energy Agency,
Vienna.
16.
ICRU, 1993. Prescribing,
Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy. Report No. 50.
International Commission on Radiation Units and
Measurements, Bethesda,
MD.
17.
ICRU, 1999. Prescribing,
Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy (Supplement to
ICRU Report No. 50). Report No. 62. International
Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements,
Bethesda, MD.
18.
ICRU, 2006. Measurement
Quality Assurance for Ionizing Radiation Dosimetry. Report No. 76, vol.
6, No. 2. International Commission on Radiation Units and
Measurements, Bethesda,
MD.
19.
IEC, 1997. General
Requirements for Safety. 4. Collateral Standard: Programmable Electrical Medical
Systems. IEC 60601-1-4. International Electrotechnical
Commission,
Geneva.
20.
IEC, 1998. Part 2:
Particular Requirements for the Safety of Electron Accelerators in the Range of 1
to 50 Mev. IEC-60601-2-1. International Electrotechnical
Commission,
Geneva.
21.
IEC, 2000. Medical
Electrical Equipment: Requirements for the Safety of Treatment Planning
Systems. IEC-62C/62083. International Electrotechnical
Commission,
Geneva.
22.
IEC, 2005. Medical
Electrical Equipment: Safety of Radiotherapy Record and Verify Systems.
IEC-62C/62274. International Electrotechnical
Commission,
Geneva.
23.
KubanD.A.TuckerS.L.DongL., 2008. Long-term results of the M.D.
Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer.
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 71,
1288; author reply 1288–1289.
24.
LeavittD.D.HuntzingerC.EtmektzoglouT., 1997. Dynamic collimator and dose rate
control: enabling technology for enhanced dynamic wedge.
Med. Dosim. 22,
167–170.
25.
LeeN.Y.LeQ.T., 2008. New developments in radiation
therapy for head and neck cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy and
hypoxia targeting. Semin. Oncol.
35, 236–250.
26.
LiuC.LiZ.PaltaJ.R., 1998. Characterizing output for the
Varian enhanced dynamic wedge field. Med. Phys.
25, 64–67.
27.
MacklisR.M.MeierT.WeinhousM.S., 1998. Error rates in clinical
radiotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol.
16, 551–556.
28.
MarciéS.CharpiotE.BensadounR-J., 2005. In vivo measurements with MOSFET
detectors in oropharynx and nasopharynx intensity-modulated radiation
therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.
61, 1603–1606.
29.
McDermottL.N.WendlingM.SonkeJ-J.van HerkM.MijnheerB.J., 2007. Replacing pretreatment
verification with in vivo EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT.
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 67,
1568–1577.
30.
MurphyM.J.BalterJ.BalterS., 2007. The management of imaging dose
during image-guided radiotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group
75. Med. Phys. 34,
4041–4063.
31.
PattonG.A.GaffneyD.K.MoellerJ.H., 2003. Facilitation of radiotherapeutic
error by computerized record and verify systems. Int. J.
Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 56,
50–57.
32.
PiermatteiA.CillaS.D'OnofrioG., 2007. Large discrepancies between
planned and actually delivered dose in IMRT of head and neck
cancer. A case report. Tumori93, 319–322.
33.
RosenwaldJ.C., 2002. Safety in radiotherapy: control of
software and informatics systems. Cancer
Radiother. 6 (Suppl. 1),
180s–189s (in French).
34.
SFPM, 2010.
Recommandations pour la mise en service et l'utilisation d'un
système de planification de traitement en radiothérapie (TPS).
Société Française de Physique Médicale, in press. Available at:
http://www.sfpm.fr.
35.
SoaresH.P.KumarA.DanielsS., 2005. Evaluation of new treatments in
radiation oncology: are they better than standard treatments?JAMA293, 970–978.
36.
van ElmptW.McDermottL.NijstenS.WendlingM.LambinP.MijnheerB., 2008. A literature review of electronic
portal imaging for radiotherapy dosimetry. Radiother.
Oncol. 88,
289–309.
37.
van SantvoortJ., 1998. Dosimetric evaluation of the
Siemens virtual wedge. Phys. Med. Biol.
43, 2651–2663.
38.
van ZijtveldM.DirkxM.BreuersM.de BoerH.HeijmenB., 2009. Portal dose image prediction for
in vivo treatment verification completely based on EPID
measurements. Med. Phys. 36,
946–952.
39.
AshD., 2007. Lessons from
Epinal. Clin. Oncol. 19,
614–615.
40.
ASN, 2007. Report
Concerning the Radiation Therapy Incident at the University Hospital Centre (CHU)
in Toulouse - Rangueil Hospital. Autorité de Sûreté
Nucléaire,
Bordeaux.
41.
DerreumauxS.EtardC.HuetC., 2008. Lessons from recent accidents in
radiation therapy in France. Radiat. Prot.
Dosimetry131, 130–135.
42.
IGAS, 2007. Summary of ASN Report
No. 2006 ENSTR 019 - IGAS No. RM 2007-015P on the Epinal Radiation Therapy Accident.
WackG.LalandeF.SeligmanM.D. (Eds.), Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire and Inspection Générale
des Affaires Sociales, Paris.
43.
MaylesW.P.M., 2007. The Glasgow incident - a
physicist's reflections. Clin. Oncol.
19, 4–7.
44.
NRC, 2007. Gamma Knife
Treatment to Wrong Side of Brain. Event Notification Report 43746.
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC.
45.
Nucletron, 2007. Incorrect
Creation of DRR Using GPU-based Methods. Customer Information Bulletin
(Nucletron) CIB-OTP 192.047-00. Nucletron,
Veenendaal.
46.
NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene,
2005. ORH Information Notice 2005-01.
Office of Radiological Health, NYC Department of Health and Mental
Hygiene, New York,
NY.
47.
RosenwaldJ.C., 2007. Personal communication.
48.
ROSIS, 2008. Internet-based
Radiation Oncology Safety Information System. Available at: http://www.rosis.info.
SMIR, 2006. Accidental overexposure
of patient Lisa Norris during radiation therapy treatment at the Beatson Oncology
Centre, Glasgow in January 2006. Report of an Investigation by the Inspector
Appointed by the Scottish Ministers for the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposures)
Regulations 2000. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh.
51.
VMS, 2005. [Treatment
Facility] Incident Evaluation Summary. CP-2005-049 Varian
Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA,
pp. 1–12.
52.
WilliamsM.V., 2007. Radiation therapy near misses,
incidents and errors: radiation therapy incident in Glasgow.
Clin. Oncol. 19,
1–3.