ACR Standard for Teleradiology (Res 21)
(1994). The American College of Radiology, Revised
1996 (Res. 26) and 1998a (Res. 35). Effective 1/1/99 ACR, Annapolis Junction,
MD.
2.
ACR Standard for Digital Image Data Management (Res.
15) (1998b). The American College of
Radiology. Effective 1/1/99 ACR,
Annapolis Junction, MD.
3.
ArcherB.R.WagnerL.K. (2000). Protecting patients by training
physicians in fluoroscopic radiation management. J. Appl.
Clin. Med. Phys. 1,
32–37.
4.
AxelssonB.BodenK.FranssonS.G.HanssonI.B.PerslidenJ.WittH.H. (2000). A comparison of analogue and
digital techniques in upper gastrointestinal examinations: absorbed dose and
diagnostic quality of the images. Eur. Radiol.
10, 1351–1354.
5.
BerghB.FelixR. (1999). WWW-based access to radiological
patient data: two years of experience. Stud. Health
Technol. Inform. 64,
217–229.
6.
BerghB.PietschM.VoglT.J. (2000). Internet technology for clinical
applications in a digital radiography department.
Radiologe40, 371–387.
7.
BeutelJ.KundelH.Van MetterR., (Eds.), 2000. Handbook of Medical Imaging,
Volumes I, II and III. SPIE - The International Society
for Optical Engineering,
Bellingham.
8.
BuschH.P. (1997). Digital radiography for clinical
applications. Eur. Radiol. 7,
66–72.
9.
BuschH.P. (2003). Management of dose and quality in
digital radiography. Fortschr. Röntgenstr.
175, 17–19.
10.
BuschH.P.BuschS.DeckerC.SchilzC. (2003). Image quality and exposure dose
in digital projection radiography. Fortschr.
Röntgenstr. 175,
32–37.
11.
CEC (1996). European
Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images. EUR
16260. Commission of the European Communities,
Luxembourg.
12.
CEC (2000). Referral
Criteria for Imaging Radiation. Radiation Protection 118. Adapted by
experts representing European Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. In conjunction with the
UK Royal College of Radiologists. Co-ordinated by the European Commission,
Directorate General for the Environment, Luxembourg. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/publication/118_en.htm.
13.
FaulknerK. (2001). Dose displays and record
keeping. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry94, 143–145.
FDA (2001). Technical
Electronic Product Radiation Safety Standards Committee, 28th Meeting.
Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human
Services, Center for Devices and Radiological Health,
Rockville, MD.
16.
FinkC.HallscheidtP.J.NoeldgeG. (2002). Clinical comparative study with a
large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of
anatomic structures on chest radiography. AJR Am. J.
Roentgenol. 178,
481–486.
GrayJ.E.LiskK.G.HaddickD.H. (1985). SMPTE test pattern for video
displays and hard copy cameras. Radiology154, 519–527.
19.
HartD.HillierM.C.WallB.F. (2002). Doses to Patients from Medical X-ray
Examinations in the UK — 2000 Review. NRPB W14. National
Radiological Protection Board, Chilton,
UK.
20.
HennigsS.P.GarmerM.JaegerH.J. (2001). Digital chest radiography with a
large-area flat-panel silicon X-ray detector: clinical comparison with
conventional radiography. Eur. Radiol.
11, 1688–1696.
21.
HerrmannA.BonelH.StablerA. (2002). Chest imaging with flat-panel
detector at low and standard doses: comparison with storage phosphor technology in
normal patients. Eur. Radiol.
12, 385–390.
22.
HIPAA (2000). Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. US Public Law
104–191, 104th Congress. Final Rule published in the Federal Register (65 FR 82462)
US Dept of Health and Human Services,
Washington, D.C..
23.
HudaW.RillL.N.BrunerA.P. (1997). Relative speeds of Kodak computed
radiography phosphors and screen-film systems. Med.
Phys. 24,
1621–1628.
24.
IEC/TR2 61223–1
(1993). Ed. 1.0. Evaluation and Routine Testing in Medical
Imaging Departments — Part 1: General Aspects, http://www.iec.ch.
25.
IEC 61223-2-4
(1994a). Ed. 1.0. Evaluation and Routine Testing in Medical
Imaging Departments — Part 2–4: Constancy Tests — Hard Copy Cameras,
http://www.iec.ch.
26.
IEC 61223-2-5
(1994b). Ed. 1.0. Evaluation and Routine Testing in Medical
Imaging Departments — Part 2–5: Constancy Tests — Image Display Devices,
http://www.iec.ch/.
27.
IAEA (1996). Basic Safety
Standards. International Atomic Energy
Agency, Vienna.
28.
ICRP (1977).
Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological
Protection. ICRP Publication 26, Ann. ICRP.
29.
ICRP (1991). 1990
Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological
Protection. ICRP Publication 60, Ann. ICRP 21(1–3).
30.
ICRP (1996).
Radiological protection and safety in medicine.
ICRP Publication 73, Ann. ICRP26(2).
31.
ICRP (2001a).
Radiation and your patient: a guide for medical
practitioners. Also includes: Diagnostic reference levels in
medical imaging — review and additional advice. Supporting Guidance 2, Ann.
ICRP31(4).
32.
ICRP (2001b).
Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional
procedures. ICRP Publication 85, Ann. ICRP30(2).
33.
ICRU (1986). Modulation
Transfer Function of Screen-film Systems. ICRU Report 41.
Nuclear Technology Publishing,
UK.
34.
ICRU (1993). Quantities and
Units in Radiation Protection Dosimetry. ICRU Report 51.
Nuclear Technology Publishing,
UK.
35.
KunzG.BuschH.P. (2000). Examination of the image quality
from digital fluoroscopy equipment with 1k- and 2k-image matrix.
Rofo. Fortschr. Geb. Rontgenstr. Neuen. Bildgeb. Verfahr.
172, 707–713.
36.
LaundersJ.H.CowenA.R.BuryR.F.HawkridgeP. (2001). Towards image quality, beam
energy and effective dose optimisation in digital thoracic
radiography. Eur. Radiol. 11,
870–875.
37.
MildenbergerP.EichelbergM.MartinE. (2002). Introduction to the DICOM
standard. Eur. Radiol. 12,
920–927.
38.
MosserH.M.PärtanG.MaltsidisA.HrubyW. (2002). Integration of healthcare information:
quality assurance of exam optimisation with automatic transfer of exposure dose
parameters into the electronic patient record. European Congress of
Radiology, B-0501 ECR, Vienna,
Austria.
39.
NEMA (1996). Digital
Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). National
Electrical Manufacturers' Association, Rosslyn,
VA, pp. 3.
1996–1996.
40.
PartanG.MayrhoferR.MosserH.MahdiT.HrubyW. (2001). Radiation dose of digital vs
conventional fluororadiography of the upper GI tract. Eur.
Radiol. 11,
2109–2111.
41.
PeerS.FaulknerK.TorbicaP. (2003). Relevant Training Issues for
Introduction of Digital Radiology: Results of a Survey. DIMOND Report,
http://www.dimond3.org/index_2.htm.
42.
PetersS.E.BrennanP.C. (2002). Digital radiography: are the
manufacturers' settings too high. Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography
system with aid of the computed radiography dose index.
Eur. Radiol. 12,
2381–2387.
43.
ReinerB.I.SiegelE.L.FlagleC.HooperF.J.CoxR.E.ScanlonM. (2000). Effect of filmless imaging on the
utilization of radiologic services. Radiology215, 163–167.
44.
RillL.N.BratemanL.ArreolaM. (2003). Evaluating radiographic
parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and
effective dose. Med. Phys. 30,
2727–2735.
45.
RCR (1993). Making the Best
Use of a Department of Radiology. Royal College of
Radiologists,
London.
46.
RCR (1999). Guide to
Information Technology in Radiology: Teleradiology and PACS.
Board of Faculty of Clinical Radiology, Royal College of
Radiologists,
London.
47.
SameiE.HillJ.G.FreyG.D.SouthgateW.M.MahE.DelongD. (2003). Evaluation of a flat panel
digital radiographic system for low-dose portable imaging of
neonates. Med. Phys. 30,
601–607.
48.
SloneR.M.MukaE.PilgramT.K. (2003). Irreversible JPEG compression of
digital chest radiographs for primary interpretation: assessment of visually
lossless threshold. Radiology228, 425–429.
49.
SmithJ. J.BerlinL. (2001). Picture archiving and
communication systems (PACS) and the loss of patient examination
records. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.
176, 1381–1384.
50.
SCAR (1994). Understanding
Teleradiology. Technology Forum. Society for Computer
Applications in Radiology, http://www.scarnet.org/.
51.
StahlM.AachT.DippelS. (2000). Digital radiography enhancement
by nonlinear multiscale processing. Med. Phys.
27, 56–65.
52.
StrotzerM.GmeinwieserJ.VolkM. (1998). Clinical application of a
flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and
potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 171,
23–27.
53.
StrotzerM.VolkM.FrundR.HamerO.ZorgerN.FeuerbachS. (2002). Routine chest radiography using a
flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose
reduction. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.
178, 169–171.
54.
TuinenburgJ.C.KoningG.HekkingE. (2000). American College of
Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data
compression phase II. The effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the
quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary
angiography. Eur. Heart J. 21,
679–686.
55.
VañóE.ArranzL.SastreJ.M. (1998). Dosimetric and radiation
protection considerations based on some cases of patient skin injuries in
interventional cardiology. Br. J. Radiol.
71, 510–516.
56.
VañóE.GonzálezL. (2001). Approaches to establishing
reference levels in interventional radiology. Radiat.
Prot. Dosimetry94, 109–112.
57.
VañóE.FaulknerK.PadovaniR.ZoeteliefJ.ToivonenM.NeofostistouV. (2001). DIMOND. A European approach to establish
and use reference levels in fluoroscopy-guided procedures. Int.
Conf. on the Radiol. Protec. of Patients, Malaga, 26–30 March 2001,
IAEA-CN-85–194, pp. 444–448.
58.
VañóE.FernándezJ.M.TenJ.I.GuibelaldeE.GonzalezL.PedrosaC.S. (2002). Real-time measurement and audit
of radiation dose to patients undergoing computed radiography.
Radiology225, 283–288.
59.
WagnerL.K.ArcherB.R.CohenA.M. (2000). Management of patient skin dose
in fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. J.
Vase. Interv. Radiol. 11,
25–33.
60.
WeatherburnG.C.BryanS. (1999). The effect of a picture archiving
and communication system (PACS) on patient radiation doses for examination of the
lateral lumbar spine. Br. J. Radiol.
72, 534–545.
61.
WHO (1983). Effective
Choices for Diagnostic Imaging in Clinical Practice. WHO Technical Report
898. World Health Organisation,
Geneva.
62.
WHO (1987). Rational Use of
Diagnostic Imaging in Paediatrics. Technical Report 757.
World Health Organisation,
Geneva.
63.
ZoeteliefJ.FaulknerK. (2001). Equipment requirements and
specification for digital and interventional radiology.
Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry94, 43–48.