This article seeks to outline why health systems and health services should play a more active role in addressing the social determinants of population health. Working from the premise that the supposed conflict between efficiency and equity is a bogus one and citing the example of potentially avoidable hospitalizations, the article suggests that there are pragmatic reasons for health services to engage in interventions that are informed by social determinants and health equity orientation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
World Health Organization. Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
2.
LalondeM. A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians. A Working Document. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada; 1974.
3.
EppJ. Achieving health for all. A framework for health promotion. Health Promot. 1986; 1: 419–428.
World Health Organization, Health and Welfare Canada and Canadian Public Health Association. Charter for Health Promotion: An International Conference on Health Promotion—The Move Towards a New Public Health, November 17–21, Ottawa. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1986.
6.
MillarJ. Getting accredited for population health. Healthc Q.2002; 5: 77–80.
7.
Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Time for Transformative Change: A Review of the 2004 Health Accord. Ottawa, ON: Senate of Canada; 2012.
8.
MurrayCJLFrenkJ. A framework for assessing the performance of health systems. Bull World Health Organ. 2000; 78: 717–731.
9.
MarmotM. Fair society, healthy lives (Marmot review): Strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010; 2010. Available at: http://www.instituteofhealthequity.org. Accessed March 15, 2012.
10.
WilliamsATsuchiyaADolanP. Eliciting equity efficiency trade-offs in health, In: SmithPGinnellyLSculpherM, eds. Health Policy and Economics: Opportunities and Challenges. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press; 2005: 64–87.
11.
CulyerAJ. The bogus conflict between efficiency and vertical equity. Health Econ.2006; 15: 1155–1158.
12.
Canadian Institute for Health Information. Reducing Gaps in Health: A Focus on Socio-economic Status in Urban Canada. Ottawa, ON: CIHI; 2008.
13.
Canadian Institute for Health Information. Hospitalization Disparities by Socioeconomic Status for Males and Females. Ottawa, ON: CIHI; 2010.
14.
RoosLLWalldRUhanovaJ. Physician visits, hospitalizations and socioeconomic status: Ambulatory care sensitive conditions in a Canadian setting. Health Serv Res.2005; 40: 1167–1185.
15.
Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health Indicators. Ottawa, ON: CIHI; 2010.
16.
JiwaniIDuboisCA. Canada. In: NolteEKnaiCMcKeeM, eds. Managing Chronic Conditions: Experience in Eight Countries. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2008. Available at http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/98414/E92058.pdf. Accessed May 28, 2012.
17.
Health Council of Canada. Why Health Care Renewal Matters: Learning from Canadians with Chronic Health Conditions. Toronto: Health Council; 2007. Available at: http://www.health-councilcanada.ca. Accessed May 28, 2012.
18.
SpringerJFPhillipsJ. The Institute of Medicine framework and its implication for the advancement of prevention policy, programs and practice. Available at: http://www.ca-sdfsc.org/docs/resources/SDFSC_IOM_Policy.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2012.
19.
StarfieldB. State of the art research on equity in health. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2006; 31: 11–32.
20.
CaminalJStarfieldBSánchezE. The role of primary care in preventing ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Eur J Public Health. 2004; 2004: 246–251.
21.
GlazierRHBajcarJKennieNR. A systematic review of interventions to improve diabetes care in socially disadvantaged populations. Diabetes Care. 2006; 19: 1675–1688.
22.
GovilSRWeidnerGMerritt-WordenT. Socioeconomic status and improvements in lifestyle, coronary risk factors and quality of life: The multisite cardiac lifestyle intervention program. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99: 1263–1270.
23.
MichieSJochelsonKMarkhamWA. Low income groups and behavior change interventions: A review of intervention content, effectiveness and theoretical frameworks. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009; 63: 610–622.
24.
FosPJFineDJ. Managerial Epidemiology for Health Care Organizations. 2nd ed.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2005.
