Work climate continuous improvement programs are implemented to create and maintain healthy workplaces. This article presents evidence-based supports for the use of “collective climates” as a tool to better target improvement strategies, taking into account that work climate is not only a key for attraction and retention issues but also for performance and quality issues. Our study in 3 different Canadian hospitals shed light on 6 typical configurations that involve specific organizational development strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GagnonSPaquetFCourcyM. Measurement and management of work climate: Cross-validation of the CRISO-Psychological Climate Questionnaire. Healthc Manage Forum. 2009.
2.
EkehammarB. Interactionism in personality from a historical perspective. Psychol Bull. 1974; 81: 1026–1048.
3.
JamesLRHaterJJGentMJBruniJR. Psychological climate: Implications from cognitive social learning theory and interactional psychology. Personnel Psychol. 1978; 31: 783–813.
4.
JamesLRSellsSB. Psychological Climate: Theoretical perspectives and empirical research. In: MagnussonD (ed): Toward a Psychology of Situations: An Interactional Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1981: 275–295.
5.
SchneiderB. Organizational climates: An essay. Personnel Psychol. 1975; 28: 447–479.
6.
JamesLR. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. J Applied Psychol. 1982; 67: 219–229.
7.
JoyceWFSlocumJW. Collective climates: Agreement as a basis for defining aggregate climates in organizations. Acad Manage J. 1984; 27: 721–742.
8.
MoranETVolkweinJF. The cultural approach to the formation of organizational climate. Hum Relat. 1992; 45: 19–47.
9.
KoffkaK. Principles of Gestalt Theory. New York: Harcourt; 1935.
10.
LewinK. Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1936.
11.
LewinK. Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper and Bros; 1951.
12.
HalpinAWCroftsDB. The Organizational Climate of Schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago; 1963.
13.
LikertR. The Human Organization. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967.
14.
BrunetLSavoieA. Le Climat de Travail. Montréal: Les Éditions Logiques; 1999.
15.
JamesLRJonesAP. Organizational climate: A review of theory and research. Psychol Bull. 1974; 81: 1096–1112.
16.
PattersonMPayneRWestM. Collective climates: A test of their sociopsychological significance. Acad Manage J. 1996; 39: 1675–1691.
17.
YoungSAParkerCP. Predicting collective climates: Assessing the role of shared work values, needs, employee interaction and work group membership. J Organ Behav Manage. 1999; 20: 1199–1218.
18.
JackofskyESlocumJWJr. A longitudinal study of climates. J Organ Behav Manage. 1988; 9: 319–334.
19.
NewmanJ. Development of a measure of perceived work environment. Acad Manage J. 1977; 20: 520–534.
20.
PayneR. Madness in our method. A comment on Jackofsky and Slocum's paper, “A longitudinal study of climates”. J Organ Behav Manage. 1990; 11: 77–80.
21.
JackofskyESlocumJWJr. Rejoinder to Payne's comment on “A longitudinal study of climates”. J Organ Behav Manage. 1990; 11: 81–83.
22.
Gonzales-RomaVPeiroJMLloretSZornovaA. The validity of collective climates. J Occup Organ Psychol. 1999; 72: 25–40.
23.
JonesAPJamesLR. Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated Work environment perceptions. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1979; 23: 201–250.
24.
JamesLAJamesLR. Integrating work environment perceptions: Explorations into the measurement of meaning. J Applied Psychol. 1989; 74: 739–751.
ParkerCPBaltesBBYoungSA. Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: A meta-analytic review. J Organ Behav. 2003; 24: 389–416.
