SiminoskiK.LeslieW.D.FrameH.Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in CanadaCan Assoc Radiol J2005; 56:178–188.
2.
BrownJ.P.JosseR.G.for the Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in CanadaCan Med Assoc J2002; 167:S1–34.
3.
World Health OrganizationAssessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: report of a WHO study groupWHO Technical Report Series1994WHOGeneva
4.
SimonelliC.AdlerR.A.BlakeG.M.Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry technical issues: the 2007 ISCD official positionsJ Clin Densitom2008; 11:109–122.
5.
KhanA.A.BrownJ.FaulknerK.Standards and guidelines for performing central dual x-ray densitometry from the Canadian panel of International Society for Clinical DensitometryJ Clin Densitom2002; 5:435–444.
6.
HamdyR.C.KiebzakG.M.Variance in 10-year fracture risk calculated with and without T-scores in select subgroups of normal and osteoporotic patientsJ Clin Densitom2009; 12:158–161.
7.
MarshallD.JohnellO.WedelH.Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fracturesBMJ1996; 312:1254–1259.
8.
CranneyA.TugwellP.WellsG.Systematic reviews of randomized trials in osteoporosis: introduction and methodologyEndocrin Rev2002; 23:497–507.
9.
KanisJ.A.BorgstromF.De LaetC.Assessment of fracture riskOsteoporos Int2005; 16:581–589.
10.
BhambriR.NaikV.MalhotraN.Changes in bone mineral density following treatment of osteomalaciaJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:120–127.
11.
SebbaA.I.Significance of a decline in bone mineral density while receiving oral bisphosphonate treatmentClin Ther2008; 30:443–452.
12.
CummingsS.R.BatesD.BlackD.M.Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific reviewJAMA2002; 288:1889–1897.
13.
CummingsS.R.CawthonP.M.EnsrudK.E.BMD and risk of hip and nonvertebral fractures in older men: a prospective study and comparison with older womenJ Bone Miner Res2006; 21:1550–1556.
14.
SiminoskiK.LeslieW.D.FrameH.Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada: a shift to absolute fracture risk assessmentJ Clin Densitom2007; 10:120–123.
15.
BlakeG.M.FogelmanI.Role of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosisJ Clin Densitom2007; 10:102–110.
16.
RobbinsJ.AragakiA.K.KooperbergC.Factors associated with 5-year risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal womenJAMA2007; 298:2389–2398.
17.
KosowiczJ.El AliZ.ZiemnickaK.Abnormalities in bone mineral density distribution and bone scintigraphy in patients with childhood onset hypopituitarismJ Clin Densitom2007; 10:332–339.
18.
BaimS.BinkleyN.BilezikianJ.P.Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of 2007 ISCD position development conferenceJ Clin Densitom2008; 11:75–91.
19.
American College of Radiology. Practice guideline for the performance of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).2008. Available at: www.acr.org. Accessed May 12, 2010.
20.
BaimS.LeonardM.B.BianchiM.Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of 2007 ISCD pediatric position development conferenceJ Clin Densitom2008; 11:6–21.
21.
BishopN.BaillonP.BurnhamJ.Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry assessment in children and adolescents with diseases that may affect the skeleton: the 2007 ISCD pediatric official positionsJ Clin Densitom2008; 11:29–42.
22.
LeslieW.D.TsangJ.F.LixL.Manitoba Bone Density ProgramSimplified system for absolute fracture risk assessment: clinical validation in Canadian womenJ Bone Miner Res2009; 24:353–360.
23.
RichardsJ.LeslieW.JosephL.Changes to osteoporosis prevalence according to method of risk assessmentJ Bone Miner Res2007; 22:228–234.
24.
BonnickS.L.Bone densitometry in clinical practice 3rd ed. 2009Humana PressTotowa (NJ)
25.
BonnickS.L.LewisL.A.Bone densitometry for technologists 2nd ed. 2006Humana PressTotowa, (NJ
26.
SawyerA.BachrachL.K.FungE.B.Bone densitometry in growing patients2007Humana PressTotowa (NJ)
27.
BinkleyN.KruegerD.What should DXA reports contain? Preferences of ordering health care providersJ Clin Densitom2009; 12:5–10.
28.
JohanssonH.KanisJ.A.OdenA.BMD, clinical risk factors and their combination for hip fracture preventionOsteoporos Int2009; 20:1675–1682.
29.
KanisJ.A.JohnellO.De LaetC.A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture riskBone2004; 35:375–382.
30.
AdachiJ.D.OlszynskiW.P.HanleyD.S.A.Management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosisSemin Arthritis Rheum2000; 29:228–251.
31.
KanisJ.A.JohanssonH.OdenA.A meta-analysis of prior corticosteroid use and fracture riskJ Bone Miner Res2004; 19:893–899.
32.
PapaioannouA.KennedyC.CranneyA.Risk factors for low bone mass in healthy men age 50 years or older: a systematic reviewOsteoporos Int2009; 20:507–518.
33.
WaughE.J.LamM.HawkerG.A.Risk factors for low bone mass in healthy 40-60 year old women: a systematic review of the literatureOsteoporos Int2008; 20:1–21.
34.
DurosierC.HansD.KriegM.Prediction and discrimination of osteoporotic hip fracture risk in postmenopausal womenJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:475–495.
35.
LewieckiE.M.WattsN.B.Assessing response to osteoporosis therapyOsteoporos Int2008; 19:1363–1368.
36.
BonnickS.L.ShulmanL.Monitoring osteoporosis therapy: bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, or both?Am J Med2006; 19:S25–S31.
37.
WestS.L.SavitzD.A.KochG.Recall accuracy for prescription medications: self-report compared with database informationAm J Epidemiol1995; 142:1103–1112.
38.
StockJ.L.WaudC.E.CoderreJ.A.Clinical reporting to primary care physicians leads to increased use and understanding of bone densitometry and affects the management of osteoporosis. A randomized trialAnn Intern Med1998; 128:996–999.
39.
RidoutR.HawkerG.A.Use of bone densitometry by Ontario family physiciansOsteoporos Int2000; 11:393–399.
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Body measurement (anthropometry). 1988. Available at: www.cdc.gov. Accessed May 12, 2010.
42.
LipmanT.H.McGinleyA.HughesJ.Evaluation of the accuracy of height assessment of premenopausal and menopausal womenJ Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs2006; 35:516–522.
43.
SiminoskiK.JiangG.AdachiJ.D.Accuracy of height loss during prospective monitoring for the detection of incident vertebral fracturesOsteoporos Int2005; 16:403–410.
44.
SiminoskiK.WarshawskiR.S.JenH.The accuracy of historical height loss for the detection of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal womenOsteoporos Int2006; 17:290–296.
45.
VokesT.J.GillenD.L.LovettJ.Comparison of T-scores from different skeletal sites in differentiating postmenopausal women with and without prevalent vertebral fracturesJ Clin Densitom2005; 8:206–215.
46.
PearsonD.HortonB.GreenD.J.Cross calibration of Hologic QDR2000 and GE Lunar Prodigy for forearm bone mineral density measurementsJ Clin Densitom2007; 10:306–311.
47.
SirisE.S.HarrisS.T.RosenC.J.Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and non-vertebral fractures from 2 US claims databasesMayo Clin Proc2006; 81:1013–1022.
48.
SheehyO.KindunduC.BarbeauM.Adherence to weekly oral bisphosphonate therapy: cost of wasted drugs and fracturesOsteoporos Int2009; 20:1583–1594.
49.
Penning-van BeestF.J.A.ErkensJ.A.OlsonM.Loss of treatment benefit due to low compliance with bisphosphonate therapyOsteoporos Int2007; 19:511–517.
50.
BlouinJ.DragomirA.MorideY.Impact of noncompliance with alendronate and risedronate on the incidence of nonvertebral osteoporotic fractures in elderly womenBr J Clin Pharmacol2008; 66:117–127.
51.
BriesacherB.A.AndradeS.E.YoodR.A.Consequences of poor compliance with bisphosphonatesBone2007; 41:882–887.
52.
CaroJ.J.IshakK.J.HuybrechtsK.F.The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practiceOsteoporos Int2004; 15:1003–1008.
53.
KanisJ.A.JohnellO.OdenA.Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholdsOsteoporos Int2001; 12:989–995.
54.
KanisJ.A.JohnellO.OdenA.FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UKOsteoporos Int2008; 9:385–397.
55.
MeltonL.J.AtkinsonE.J.KhoslaS.Evaluation of a prediction model for long-term fracture riskJ Bone Miner Res2005; 20:551–556.
56.
EddyD.JohnstonC.C.CummingsS.R.Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysisOsteoporos Int1998; 8:1–88.
57.
Van StaaT.P.LeufkensH.G.AbenhaimL.Oral corticosteroids and fracture risk: relationship to daily and cumulative dosesRheumatology2000; 39:1383–1389.
58.
McKiernanF.WashingtonW.Effect of subtle positioning flaws on measured bone mineral density of the hipJ Clin Densitom2005; 8:330–334.
59.
LeslieW.D.for the Manitoba Bone Density ProgramThe impact of bone area on short-term bone density precisionJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:150–153.
60.
KlineG.A.HanleyD.A.Differences of vertebral area in serial bone density measurements: a common source of potential error in interpretation of BMD changeJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:419–424.
61.
BaimS.WilsonC.R.LewieckiE.M.Precision assessment and radiation safety for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometryJ Clin Densitom2005; 8:371–378.
62.
LekamwasamS.RodrigoM.Kodikara ArachchiW.Measurement of spinal bone mineral density on a Hologic Discovery DXA scanner with and without leg elevationJ Clin Densitom2007; 10:170–173.
63.
KhanA.A.ColquhounA.HanleyD.A.Standards and guidelines for technologists performing central dual-energy x-ray absorptiometryJ Clin Densitom2007; 10:189–195.
64.
KhanA.A.BrownJ.P.KendlerD.L.The 2002 Canadian bone densitometry recommendations: take-home messagesCMAJ2002; 167:1141–1145.
65.
WattsN.B.Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)Osteoporos Int2004; 15:847–854.
66.
BachrachL.K.Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements of bone density and body composition: promise and pitfallsJ Pediatr Endocrinol Metab13Suppl 22000983–988.
67.
LaskeyM.A.FlaxmanM.E.BarberR.W.Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy x-ray absorptiometersBr J Radiol1991; 64:1023–1029.
68.
FinkH.A.HarrisonS.L.TaylorB.C.Differences in site-specific fracture risk among older women with discordant results for osteoporosis at hip and spineJ Clin Densitom2008; 11:250–259.
69.
HamdyR.C.PetakS.M.LenchikL.Which central dual x-ray absorptiometry site should be used to determine the diagnosis of osteoporosis?J Clin Densitom2002; 5:S11–S18.
70.
TsangJ.F.LeslieW.D.Exclusion of focal vertebral artifacts from spine bone densitometry and fracture prediction: a comparison of expert physicians, three computer algorithms, and the minimum vertebraJ Bone Miner Res2007; 22:789–798.
71.
ChenP.MillerP.D.BinkleyN.C.Use of lowest single lumbar spine vertebra bone mineral density T-score and other T-score approaches for diagnosing osteoporosis and relationships to vertebral fracture statusJ Clin Densitom2008; 11:525–531.
72.
HansenK.E.BinkleyN.ChristianR.Interobserver reproducibility of criteria for vertebral body exclusionJ Bone Miner Res2005; 20:501–508.
73.
ColeR.LarsonJ.The effect of measurement of the contralateral hip if the spine is not included in the bone mineral density analysisJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:210–216.
74.
YangR.S.TsaiK.S.ChiengP.U.Symmetry of bone mineral density at the proximal femur with emphasis on the effect of side dominanceCalcif Tissue Int1997; 61:189–191.
75.
CareyJ.J.DelaneyM.F.LoveT.E.DXA-generated Z-scores and T-scores may differ substantially and significantly in young adultsJ Clin Densitom2007; 10:351–358.
76.
BinkleyN.KruegerD.Vallarta-AstN.An overlying fat panniculus affects femur bone mass measurementJ Clin Densitom2003; 6:199–204.
77.
OttS.M.IchikawaL.E.LaCroixA.Z.Navel jewelry artifacts and intravertebral variation in spine bone densitometry in adolescents and young womenJ Clin Densitom2009; 12:84–88.
78.
YuW.GluerC.C.FuerstT.Influence of degenerative joint disease on spinal bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal womenCalcif Tissue Int1995; 57:169–174.
79.
KregeJ.H.MillerP.D.LenchikL.New or worsening lumbar spine vertebral fractures increase lumbar spine bone mineral density and falsely suggest improved skeletal statusJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:144–149.
80.
ReidI.R.EvansM.C.AmesR.The influence of osteophytes and aortic calcification on spinal mineral density in post-menopausal womenJ Clin Endocrinol Metab1991; 72:1372–1377.
81.
KendlerD.L.KiebzakG.M.AmbroseC.G.Effect of calcium tablets on interpretation of lumbar spine DXA scansJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:97–104.
82.
JaovisdhaS.SartorisD.J.MartinE.M.Influence of spondylopathy on bone densitometry using dual energy x-ray absorptiometryCalcif Tissue Int1997; 60:424–429.
83.
JacobsenJ.A.JamadarD.A.HayesC.W.Dual X-ray absorptiometry: recognizing image artifacts and pathologyAJR Am J Roentgenol2000; 174:1699–1705.
84.
MorganS.L.Lopez-BenR.NunnallyN.“Black hole artifacts”: a new potential pitfall for DXA accuracy?J Clin Densitom2008; 11:266–275.
85.
LabioE.D.Del RosarioD.B.StrasserS.I.Effect of ascites on bone mineral measurements in cirrhosisJ Clin Densitom2007; 10:391–394.
86.
HauacheO.M.VieiraJ.G.H.AlonsoG.Increased hip bone mineral density in a woman with gluteal silicon implantJ Clin Densitom2000; 3:391–393.
87.
KruegerD.ChecovichM.GemarD.Calcium supplement ingestion may alter lumbar spine bone mineral density measurementJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:159–163.
88.
EvansE.M.MojtahediM.C.KessingerR.B.Simulated change in body fatness affects Hologic QDR 4500A whole body and central DXA bone measuresJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:315–322.
89.
McKiernanF.E.HockingJ.CournoyerS.Antecedent 99mTc-MDP and 99mTc-sestamibi administration corrupts bone mineral density measured by DXAJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:164–166.
90.
SalaA.WebberC.HaltonJ.Effect of diagnostic radioisotopes and radiographic contrast media on measurements of lumbar spine bone mineral density and body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometryJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:91–96.
91.
BertelloniS.BaroncelliG.I.FerdeghiniM.Normal volumetric bone mineral density and bone turnover in young men with histories of constitutional delay of pubertyJ Clin Endocrinol Metab1998; 83:4280–4283.
92.
KarlssonM.K.WeigallS.J.DuanY.Bone size and volumetric density is women with anorexia nervosa receiving estrogen replacement therapy and in women recovered from anorexia nervosaJ Clin Endocrinol Metab2000; 85:3177–3182.
93.
GravholtC.H.LauridsenA.L.BrixenK.Marked disproportionality in bone size and mineral, and distinct abnormalities in bone markers and calcitropic hormones in adult Turner syndrome: a cross-sectional studyJ Clin Endocrinol Metab2002; 87:2798–2808.
94.
Pors NielsenS.KolthoffN.BarenholdtO.Diagnosis of osteoporosis by planar bone densitometry: can body size be disregarded?Br J Radiol1998; 71:934–943.
95.
BlakeG.M.HerdR.J.M.PatelR.The effect of weight change on total body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: results from a clinical trialOsteoporos Int2000; 11:832–839.
96.
TothillP.Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements of total body bone mineral during weight changeJ Clin Densitom2005; 8:31–38.
97.
HochbergM.C.GreenspanS.WasnichR.D.Changes in bone density and turnover explain the reductions in incidence on nonvertebral fractures that occur during treatment with antiresorptive agentsJ Clin Endocrinol Metab2002; 12:281–289.
98.
CranneyA.GuyattG.GriffithL.Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. IX: summary of meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosisEndocrin Rev2002; 23:570–578.
99.
BonnickS.L.Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: a vital tool or regression towards mediocrity?J Clin Endocrinol Metab2000; 85:3493–3495.
100.
WasnichR.D.MillerP.D.Antifracture efficacy of antiresorptive agents are related to changes in bone densityJ Clin Endocrinol Metab2000; 85:231–236.
101.
CummingsS.R.PalermoL.BrownerW.Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: misleading changes and regression to the meanJAMA2000; 283:1318–1321.
102.
LenchikL.KiebzakG.M.BluntB.A.What is the role of serial bone density measurements in patient management?J Clin Densitom2002; 5:S29–S38.
103.
PhillipovG.SeabornC.J.PhillipsP.J.Reproducibility of DEXA: potential impact on serial measurements and misclassification of osteoporosisOsteoporos Int2001; 12:49–54.
104.
PouillesJ.TremollieresF.TodorovskyN.Precision and sensitivity of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosisJ Bone Miner Res1991; 6:997–1002.
105.
GluerC.C.BlakeG.LuY.Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniquesOsteoporos Int1995; 5:262–270.
106.
BonnickS.L.JohnstonC.C.KleerekoperM.Importance of precision in bone density measurementsJ Clin Densitom2001; 4:105–110.
107.
LeslieW.D.MoayyeriA.Minimum sample size requirements for bone density precision assessment produce inconsistency in clinical monitoringOsteoporos Int2006; 17:1673–1680.
108.
LeslieW.D.Factors affecting short-term bone density precision assessment and the effect on patient monitoringJ Bone Miner Res2008; 23:199–204.
109.
ShepherdJ.A.LuY.A generalized least significant change for individuals measured on different DXA systemsJ Clin Densitom2007; 10:249–258.
110.
BennettH.S.DienstfreyA.HudsonL.T.Standards and measurements for assessing bone health-workshop report co-sponsored by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)J Clin Densitom2006; 9:399–405.
111.
ShepherdJ.A.LuY.WilsonK.Cross-calibration and minimum precision standards for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD official positionsJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:31–36.
112.
GordonC.M.BachrachL.K.CarpenterT.O.Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry interpretation and reporting in children and adolescents: the 2007 ISCD pediatric official positionsJ Clin Densitom2008; 11:43–58.
113.
RauchF.PlotkinH.DiMeglioL.Fracture prediction and the definition of osteoporosis in children and adolescents: the ISCD 2007 pediatric official positionJ Clin Densitom2008; 11:22–28.
114.
BinkovitzL.A.HenwoodM.J.SparkeP.Pediatric DXA: technique, interpretation, and clinical applicationsPediatr Radiol2008; 8:S227–S239.
115.
EllisK.J.ShypailoR.J.HardinD.S.Z-score prediction model for assessment of bone mineral content in pediatric diseasesJ Bone Miner Res2001; 16:1658–1664.
116.
GafniR.I.BaronJ.Overdiagnosis of osteoporosis in children due to misinterpretation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)J Pediatr2004; 144:253–257.
117.
CromerB.A.BinkovitzL.ZieglerJ.Reference values for bone mineral density in 12- to 18-year old girls categorized by weight, race, and agePediatr Radiol2004; 34:787–792.
118.
GouldingA.JonesI.E.TaylorR.W.Bone mineral density and body composition in boys with distal forearm fractures: a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry studyJ Pediatr2001; 139:509–515.
119.
BachrachL.K.Osteoporosis and measurement of bone mass in children and adolescentsEndocrinol Metab Clin North Am2005; 34:521–535.
120.
GordonC.M.Measurement of bone density in childrenCurr Opin Endocrinol Metab2005; 12:444–451.
121.
SoykaL.A.FairfieldW.P.KlibanskiA.Hormonal determinants and disorders of peak bone mass in childrenJ Clin Endocrinol Metab2000; 85:3951–3963.
122.
HaltonJ.GabouryI.GrantR.Advanced vertebral fracture among newly diagnosed children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the Canadian Steroid-associated Osteoporosis in the Pediatric Population (STOPP) Research ProgramJ Bone Miner Res2009; 24:1326–1334.
123.
BurnhamJ.M.ShultsJ.SemeaoE.Whole body BMC in pediatric Crohn disease: independent effects of altered growth, maturation, and body compositionJ Bone Miner Res2004; 19:1961–1968.
124.
BielinskiB.K.DarbyshireP.J.MathersL.Impact of disordered puberty on bone density in beta-thalassaemia majorBr J Haematol2003; 120:353–358.
125.
MillerK.K.LeeE.E.LawsonE.A.Determinants of skeletal loss and recovery in anorexia nervosaJ Clin Endocrinol Metab2006; 91:2931–2937.
126.
JonesG.MaD.CameronF.Bone density interpretation and relevance in Caucasian children aged 9-17 years of age: insights from a population-based fracture studyJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:202–209.
127.
WarnerJ.T.CowanF.J.DunstanF.D.Measured and predicted bone mineral content in healthy boys and girls aged 6-18 years: adjustment for body size and pubertyActa Paediatr1998; 87:244–249.
128.
BarnesC.NewallF.IgnatovicV.Reduced bone density in children on long-term warfarinPediatr Res2005; 57:578–581.
129.
BinkleyN.BilezikianJ.P.KendlerD.L.Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2005 position development conferenceJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:4–14.
130.
MulD.van Suijlekom-SmitL.W.ten CateR.Bone mineral density and body composition and influencing factors in children with rheumatic disease treated with corticosteroidsJ Pediatr Endocrinol Metab2002; 15:187–192.
131.
WebberC.E.SalaA.BarrR.D.Accounting for body size deviations when reporting bone mineral density variables in childrenOsteoporos Int2009; 20:113–121.
132.
ColeJ.H.DowthwaiteJ.N.ScerpellaT.A.Correcting fan-beam magnification in clinical densitometry scans of growing subjectsJ Clin Densitom2009; 12:322–329.
133.
SmithC.M.CoombsR.C.GibsonA.T.Adaptation of the Carter method to adjust lumbar spine bone mineral content for age and body size: application to children who were born pretermJ Clin Densitom2006; 9:114–119.
134.
CrabtreeN.J.KibirigeM.S.FordhamJ.N.The relationship between lean body mass and bone mineral content in paediatric health and diseaseBone2004; 35:965–972.
135.
HammamiM.KooW.W.HockmanE.M.Technical considerations for fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in pediatric studiesJ Parenter Enteral Nutr2004; 28:328–332.
136.
The Writing Group for the ISCD (2004) Position Development Conference: diagnosis of osteoporosis in men, premenopausal women, and childrenJ Clin Densitom2004; 7:17–26.
137.
ChengS.NicholsonP.H.F.KrogerH.Difference in estimates of change of bone accrual and body composition in children because of scan mode selection with the Prodigy densitometerJ Clin Densitom2005; 8:65–73.
138.
SimpsonD.E.DontuV.S.StephensS.E.Large variations occur in bone density measurements of children when using different softwareNucl Med Commun2005; 26:483–487.
139.
FaulknerR.A.BaileyD.A.DrinkwaterD.T.Regional and total body bone mineral content, bone mineral density, and total body tissue composition in children 8-16 years of ageCalcif Tissue Int1993; 53:7–12.
140.
MarguliesL.HorlickM.ThorntonJ.C.Reproducibility of pediatric whole body bone and body composition measures by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using the GE Lunar prodigyJ Clin Densitom2005; 8:298–304.
141.
GlastreC.BraillonP.DavidL.Measurement of bone mineral content of the lumbar spine by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal children: correlations with growth parametersJ Clin Endocrinol Metab1990; 70:1330–1333.