The concept of artificial intelligence (AI) was born in the mid-twentieth century to describe endeavours in computer science focusing on the simulation of human learning. Since then, advances in computing, data collection and data storage have made AI an increasingly important area for researchers and practitioners across a range of disciplines in business and the social sciences. Despite that, there appears to be very few attempts at cataloging and condensing prior research in this area. As such, this paper uses the VOSViewer data visualizer to determine the major authors in the field and to identify themes and concepts emanating from prior research.
AakerJ.L.1997. Dimensions of brand personality. J. Mark. Res. 34 (3), 347–356.
2.
BakpayevM.BaekT.H.van EschP.YoonS.2020. Programmatic creative: Al can think but it cannot feel. Australas. Mark. J. (forthcoming).
3.
BergerJ.MilkmanK.L.2012. What makes online content viral?J. Mark. Res. 49 (2), 192–205.
4.
BlackJ.S.van EschP.2020. Al-enabled recruiting: what is it and how should a manager use it?Bus. Horiz. 63 (2), 215–226.
5.
BoellS.K.Cecez-KecmanovicD.2015. On being ‘systematic’in literature reviews. ln: Formulating research methods for information systems. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 48–78.
6.
ChevalierJ.A.MayzlinD.2006. The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. J. Mark. Res. 43 (3), 345–354.
CrossanM.M.ApaydinM.2010. A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. J. Manag. Stud. 47 (6), 1154–1191.
9.
CuiD.P.CurryD.2005. Prediction in marketing using the support vector machine. Mark. Sci. 24 (4), 595–615.
10.
CuiG.WongM.L.LuiH.K.2006. Machine learning for direct marketing response models: bayesian networks with evolutionary programming. Manag. Sci. 52 (4), 597–612.
11.
CukierK.2019. Ready for robots: how to think about the future of Al. Foreign Aff. 98, 192.
12.
Curriml.S.SchneiderL.G.1991. A taxonomy of consumer purchase strategies in a promotion intensive environment. Mark. Sci. 10 (2), 91–110.
13.
DavenportT.GuhaA.GrewalD.BressgottT.2020. How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 48 (1), 24–42.
14.
DawarN.BendleN.2018. Marketing in the age of Alexa. Harv. Bus. Rev. 96 (3), 80–86.
15.
DeckerR.TrusovM.2010. Estimating aggregate consumer preferences from online product reviews. lnt. J. Res. Mark. 27 (4), 293–307.
EvgeniouTheodorosPontilM.ToubiaO. 2007. A convex optimization approach to modeling consumer heterogeneity in conjoint estimation. Mark. Sci. 26 (6), 805–818.
18.
FalagasM.E.PitsouniE.l.MalietzisG.A.PappasG.2008. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 22 (2), 338–342.
19.
Gaviria-MarinM.MerigóJ.M.Baier-FuentesH.2019. Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change140, 194–220.
20.
GhoseA.lpeirotisP.G.LiB.2012. Designing ranking systems for hotels on travel search engines by mining user-generated and crowdsourced content. Mark. Sci. 31 (3, Sl), 493–520.
21.
GopaldasA.2014. Marketplace sentiments. J. Consum. Res. 41 (4), 995–1014.
GrewalD.RoggeveenA.L.NordfaltJ.2017. The future of retailing. J. Retail. 93 (1, Sl), 1–6.
24.
HauserJ.R.ToubiaO.EvgeniouT.BefurtR.DzyaburaD.2010. Disjunctions of conjunctions, cognitive simplicity, and consideration sets. J. Mark. Res. 47 (3), 485–496.
25.
KietzmannJ.LeeL.W.McCarthyl.P.KietzmannT.C.2020. Deepfakes: trick or treat?Bus. Horiz. 63 (2), 135–146.
26.
KöhlerC.MantralaM.K.AlbersS.KanuriV.K.2017. A meta-analysis of marketing communication carryover effects. J. Mark. Res. 54 (6), 990–1008.
27.
KohtamäkiM.RabetinoR.MöllerK.2018. Alliance capabilities: A systematic review and future research directions. lnd. Mark. Manag. 68, 188–201.
28.
LeCunY.BengioY.HintonG.2015. Deep learning. Nature521 (7553), 436–444.
29.
MerigóJ.M.PedryczW.WeberR.de la SottaC.2018. Fifty years of lnformation Sciences: A bibliometric overview. lnf. Sci. 432, 245–268.
30.
MicuA.MicuA.E.GeruM.LixandroiuR.C.2017. Analyzing user sentiment in social media: implications for online marketing strategy. Psychol. Mark. 34 (12), 1094–1100.
31.
MogajiE.SoetanT.O.KieuT.A.2020. The implications of artificial intelligence on the digital marketing of financial services to vulnerable customers. Australas. Mark. J. (forthcoming).
32.
MooreD.J.HarrisW.D.1996. Affect intensity and the consumer’s attitude toward high impact emotional advertising appeals. J. Advert. 25 (2), 37–50.
33.
NetzerO.LemaireA.HerzensteinM.2019. When words sweat: identifying signals for loan default in the text of loan applications. J. Mark. Res. 56 (6), 960–980.
34.
OosthuizenK.BothaE.RobertsonJ.MontecchiM.2020. Al in retail: the Al-en- abled value chain. Australas. Mark. J. (forthcoming).
35.
PaschenJ.PaschenU.PalaE.KietzmannJ.2020. Artificial intelligence (Al) and value co-creation in B2B sales: activities, actors and resources. Australas. Mark. J. (forthcoming).
36.
PaschenU.PittC.KietzmannJ.2019. Artificial intelligence: Building blocks and an innovation typology. Bus. Horiz. 63 (2), 147–155. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2019.10.004.
37.
PittC.MulveyM.KietzmannJ.2018. Quantitative insights from online qualitative data: an example from the health care sector. Psychol. Mark. 35 (12), 1010–1017.
38.
RaiA., 2020. Explainable Al: from black box to glass box. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 48 (1), 137–141.
39.
RobertsJ., 2016. Thinking machines: the search for Artificial lntelligence. Distillations. https://www.sciencehistory.org.
40.
SarmentoM.SimoesC.2018. The evolving role of trade fairs in business: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. lnd. Mark. Manag. 73, 154–170.
41.
SmidtsA.HsuM.SanfeyA.BoksemM.EbsteinR.HuettelS.YoonC.2014. Advancing consumer neuroscience. Mark. Lett. 25 (3), 257–267.
42.
SonnierG.P.McAlisterL.RutzO.J.2011. A dynamic model of the effect of online communications on firm sales. Mark. Sci. 30 (4), 702–716.
43.
TirunillaiS.TellisG.J.2014. Mining marketing meaning from online chatter: strategic brand analysis of big data using latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mark. Res. 51 (4), 463–479.
44.
ToubiaO.HauserJ.R.SimesterD.I.2004. Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. J. Mark. Res. 41 (1), 116–131.
45.
Van EckN.J.WaltmanL. 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics84 (2), 523–538.
Van EschP.BlackJ.S.FranklinD.HarderM. 2020. AI-enabled biometrics in recruiting: insights from marketers for managers. Australas. Mark. J. (forthcoming).
48.
Van EschP.BlackS.J. 2019. Factors that influence new generation candidates to engage with and complete digital, AI-enabled recruiting. Bus. Horiz. 62 (6),729–739.
49.
Van EschP.BlackS.J.FerolieJ. 2019. Marketing AI recruitment: the next phase in job application and selection. Comput. Hum. Behav. 90, 215–222.
50.
Van EschP.MenteM. 2018. Marketing video-enabled social media as part of your e-recruitment strategy: stop trying to be trendy. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 44, 266–273.
WhittakerL.LetherenK.MulcahyR.2020. The Rise of Deepfakes: a conceptual framework and research agenda. AustralasMark. J. (forthcoming). WongD. 2018. VOSviewer. Tech. Serv. Q. 35 (2), 219–220.
55.
XuY.ShiehC.H.van EschP.LingI.L.2020. AI customer service: task complexity, problem-solving ability, and usage intention. Australas. Mark. J. (forthcoming).
