Critically reviewing the literature is an indispensible skill which is used throughout a research career. This demystifies the processes involved in systematically and critically reviewing the literature to demonstrate knowledge, identify research ideas and questions, position research and develop theory. A three stage model (assembling, arranging and assessing), each with two interrelated steps, is presented and discussed, along with practical tips and helpful examples. Although aimed primarily at research students, this information in this article will also be useful for research supervisors who wish to find ways to pass along their tacit knowledge related to this critical research skill.
AhearnL. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 30, 109–137
2.
AlpertF., KaminsM.A.2004. Doctoral coursework is needed in Australasia. Australas. Mark. J., 12(1), 66–82.
3.
BelkR. W. (1989). Extended self and extending paradigmatic perspective. J. Consum. Res., 16(1), 129–132.
4.
Research Colloquium on Multi Methods & Multi Perspectives in Marketing & Consumer Research, Monash University, MelbourneBelkR.W.Research Colloquium on Multi Methods & Multi Perspectives in Marketing & Consumer Research2001Monash UniversityMelbourne
5.
BorgersonJ. L. (2005). Materiality, agency, and the constitution of consuming subjects: Insights for consumer research.Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.32, ed. Geeta Menon and Akshay R. Rao,439-43.MenonG.RaoA.K.443
6.
BrinerR. B., DenyerD. (2012). Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool.AU: Please provide publisher name in Ref. “Briner and Denyer (2012)". Handbook of Evidence-Based Management: Companies, Classrooms and Research, 112-129.RousseauD.M.New York University PressNew York
7.
CallahanJ. L. (2010). Constructing a manuscript: Distinguishing integrative literature reviews and conceptual and theory articles. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev., 9(3), 300–304.
8.
CallahanJ. L. (2014). Writing literature reviews: a reprise and update. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev.13(3), 271–275.
9.
DenyerD., TranfieldD. (2009), Producing a systematic review. In BuchananD.A., BrymanA. (Eds). The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (pp. 671–689), Los Angeles: Sage.
10.
EppA.M., PriceL.L. (2010). The storied life of singularized objects: forces of agency and network transformation. J. Consum. Res., 36 (5), 820–837.
11.
FernandezK. V., RosenD. L. (2000). The effectiveness of information and color in yellow pages advertising. J. Advert., 29(2), 61–73.
12.
FernandezK. V. and LastovickaJ. L. (2011). Making magic: Fetishes in contemporary consumption. J. Consum. Res., 38(2), 278–299
13.
FifitaI. M., SmithS. D., FernandezK. V. (2015). The role of self-construal in resisting tobacco smoking. Australas. Mark. J. (AMJ), 23(4), 294–302.
14.
KleineS.S., BakerS.M., 2004. An integrative review of material possession attachment. Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev., 1(1), pp. 1–39.
15.
KnappettC. and L.Malafouris (2008). Material and nonhuman agency: An introduction. in Material Agency, ed. Carl Knappett and Lambos Malafouris, NY: Springer, i to xix.MalafourisL.KnappettC.MalafourisL. xix
16.
MacInnisD. J., FolkesV. S. (2017). Humanizing brands: when brands seem to be like me, part of me, and in a relationship with me. J. Consum. Psychol., 27(3), 355–374.
17.
MillerD. (1987). Material culture and mass consumption
18.
MoneyA. (2007). Material culture and the living room: The appropriation and use of goods in everyday life. J. Consum. Cult., 7(3), 355–377
19.
C. Otnes, C., A. Ruth, J., & Marie CrosbyE. (2014). Product-agency benefits: Consumer perspectives and strategic implications. European Journal of Marketing, 48(5/6), 878–898.OtnesC.C.RuthJ.A.Eur. J. Marketing
20.
PinsonC., 2008. Some observations and advice from the outgoing Editor. Rech. et Appl. en Mark., 23 (4), 1–5.
21.
ReuberR., 2010. Strengthening your literature review. Fam. Bus. Rev.23(2), 105–108.
22.
SnuggE., JevonsC.2018. Reconceptualising the scholarship of marketing eduation – SoME futurescapes. Australas. Mark. J.26, 180–186.Reconceptualising the scholarship of marketing eduation – SoME futurescapes
23.
TranfieldD., DenyerD., SmartP. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag., 14(3), 207–222.
24.
TorracoR. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev., 4(3), 356–367.
25.
UnclesM.2018. Directions in higher education. A marketing perspective. Australas. Mark. J.26, 187–193.
26.
WebsterJ., WatsonR.J.2002. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q.26 (2), xiii–xxiii.
