This research note provides technical aspects of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) for scholars seeking to better understanding the potentiality of the method. The note answers a few frequently asked questions about contrarian case analysis and data calibration and show how to implement these two relevant steps technically and appropriately. This study provides useful details and technical explanations on why and how to turn case data by using contrarian case analysis and how to calibrate data into fuzzy sets.
ArmstrongJ.S.Illusions in regression analysisInt. J. Forecast.2012689–69410.1016/j.ijforecast.2012.02.001
2.
Berg-SchlosserD.Calibrating and aggregating multi-dimensional concepts with fuzzy sets: “Human Development” and the quality of democracyAustralas. Mark. J.262018350–357
3.
CrillyD.ZolloM.HansenM.T.Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressuresAcad. Manag. J.5520121429–144810.5465/amj.2010.0697
4.
de BlockD., & VisB. (2017). Addressing the Challenges in Using Qualitative Data in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (COMPASSS Working Paper 2017-88). Retrieved from the COMPASSS website: http://www.compasss.org/wpseries/deBlockVis2017.pdf.
5.
de VilliersR.QCA in empirical marketing research: an experiment featuring Dorah Explorah, investigating celebrity endorsement's effect on product selectionAustralas. Mark. J.252017225–25010.1016/j.ausmj.2017.09.009
6.
de VilliersR.TipgomutP.Reviewing the marketing theory adoption journey for studies using QCA as a methodological approach: insights, gaps and agenda for future researchAustralas. Mark. J.262018317–337
7.
DowneyJ.StanyerJ.Comparative media analysis: why some fuzzy thinking might help. Applying fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to the personalization of mediated political communicationEur. J. Commun.2542010331–347doi: 10.1177%2F0267323110384256
8.
DuşaA.User manual for the QCA (GUI) package in RJ. Bus. Res.6052007576–586
9.
FissP.C.A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurationsAcad. Manag. Rev.3220071180–119810.5465/amr.2007.26586092
10.
FissP.C.Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization researchAcad. Manag. J.5422011393–42010.5465/amj.2011.60263120
11.
FurnariS.‘Four Approaches to Longitudinal QCA: Opportunities and Challenges’, Presentation at the QCA PDW20182018Academy of ManagementChicago, USA
12.
GabrielA.S.CampbellJ.T.DjurdjevicE.JohnsonR.E.RosenC.C.Fuzzy profiles: comparing and contrasting latent profile analysis and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis for person-centered researchOrgan. Res. Methods212018877–90410.1177/1094428117752466
13.
GoertzG.MahoneyJ.A Tale of two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences201210.1515/9781400845446
14.
GreckhamerT.FurnariS.FissP.C.AguileraR.V.Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: best practices in strategy and organization researchStrateg. Organ.162018482–49510.1177/1476127018786487
15.
GreckhamerT.MisangyiV.F.FissP.C.The two QCAs: from a small-N to a large-N set theoretic approachFissP.C.CambreB.MarxA.Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research2013Emerald GroupBingley, England49–7510.1108/s0733-558x(2013)0000038007
16.
KrausS.Ribeiro-SorianoD.SchüsslerM.Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (FsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research—the rise of a methodInt. Entrep. Manag. J.14201815–3310.1007/s11365-017-0461-8
17.
MaB.LiX.ZhangL.The effects of loyalty programs in services—a double-edged swordJ. Serv. Mark.322018300–31010.1108/jsm-06-2016-0227
18.
MisangyiV.F.GreckhamerT.FurnariS.FissP.C.CrillyD.AguileraR.Embracing causal complexity: the emergence of a neo-configurational perspectiveJ. Manag.432017255–28210.1177/0149206316679252
19.
MollenkopfD.A.RabinovichE.LaseterT.M.BoyerK.K.Managing internet product returns: a focus on effective service operationsDecis. Sci.3822007215–25010.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00157.x
20.
OrdaniniA.ParasuramanA.RuberaG.When the recipe is more important than the ingredients: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of service innovation configurationsJ. Serv. Res.172014134–14910.1177/1094670513513337
21.
RaginC.C.Fuzzy-set Social Science2000Chicago University PressChicago, IL10.1017/s0003055402800247
22.
RaginC.C.Measurement versus calibration: a set-theoretic approachBox-SteffenmeierJ.M.BradyH.E.CollierD.The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology2008Oxford University PressOxford, England10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0008
23.
RaginC.C.FissP.C.Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: an empirical demonstrationRaginC.Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond2008Chicago University PressChicago, IL190–212
24.
RihouxB.MarxA.Qualitative comparative analysis at 25: state of play and agendaPolitical Res. Q.662013167–17110.1353/sof.2010.0011
25.
RussoI.ConfenteI.Customer Loyalty and Supply Chain Management: Business-to-business Customer Loyalty Analysis2017RoutledgeNew York, NY10.4324/9781315162829
26.
RussoI.ConfenteI.GligorD.M.AutryC.W.To be or not to be (loyal): is there a recipe for customer loyalty in the B2B context?J. Bus. Res.692016888–89610.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.002
27.
RussoI.ConfenteI.GligorD.CobelliN.A roadmap for applying qualitative comparative analysis in supply chain research: the reverse supply chain caseInt. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag.201810.1108/ijpdlm-02-2018-0056
28.
SchmittA.K.GraweA.WoodsideA.G.Illustrating the power of fsQCA in explaining paradoxical consumer environmental orientationsPsychol. Mark.342017323–33410.1002/mar.20991
29.
SchneiderC.Q.Realists and idealists in QCAPolitical Anal.262018246–25410.1017/pan.2017.45
30.
SchneiderC.Q.WagemannC.Reducing complexity in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): remote and proximate factors and the consolidation of democracyEur. J. Political Res.452006751–78610.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00635.x
31.
SchneiderC.Q.WagemannC.Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-setsComp. Sociol.92010397–41810.1163/156913210x12493538729793
32.
ThomannE.MaggettiM.Designing research with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): approaches, challenges, and toolsSociol. Methods Res.46201710.1177/0049124117729700
WagemannC.BucheJ.SiewertM.B.QCA and business research: work in progress or a consolidated agendaJ. Bus. Res.6920162531–254010.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.010
35.
WoodsideA. (2014). Personal communication, 17 December 2014.
36.
WoodsideA.G.Visualizing matching generalizing: case identification hypotheses and case-level data analysisAustralas. Mark. J.2332015246–25810.1016/j.ausmj.2015.07.002
37.
WoodsideA.G.Embrace complexity theory, perform contrarian case analysis, and model multiple realitiesWoodsideA.G.Bad to Good: Achieving High Quality and Impact in Your Research2016Emerald Group57–8110.1108/978-1-78635-334-420161003
38.
WoodsideA.G.The good practices manifesto: overcoming bad practices pervasive in current research in businessJ. Bus. Res.692016365–38110.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.008
39.
WoodsideA.G.BaxterR.Achieving accuracy, generalization-to-contexts, and complexity in theories of business-to-business decision processesInd. Mark. Manag.4232013382–39310.1016/j.indmarman.2013.02.004
40.
WoodsideA.Embrace perform model: complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realitiesJ. Bus. Res.67201420142495–2503
41.
WuP.L.YehS.S.HuanT.C.WoodsideA.G.Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformationsJ. Bus. Res.6720141647–167010.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.012
