While there is no shortage of worthy recipients for prosocial behaviour, there is a constant battle to attract and keep donors. This research examines both money and blood donor behaviour for two key groups, new donors, (to grow the donor base), and frequent donors (to secure current support streams). We draw on over 1.2 million records from a U.S. health related charity for a three-year timeframe; and records of all Australian blood donors (1.1 million) for a five-year timeframe. We show the law-like patterns that underpin brand growth in other markets also apply in the non-profit sector. The vast majority of new donors give just once or twice a year with few giving at higher frequency levels. The stability of donation churn across blood and money suggests a structural norm in behaviour over time rather than an outcome of marketing activity. We discuss implications for resource allocation and marketing strategies.
BagotK.L.BoveL.L.MasserB.M.BednallT.C.BuzzaM.Perceived deterrents to being a plasmapheresis donor in a voluntary, nonremunerated environmentTransfusion5320131108–1119
10.
BagotK.L.BoveL.L.MasserB.M.WhiteK.M.Asking for something different from our donors: factors influencing persuasion successTransfusion5432014848–855
11.
BagotK.L.MasserB.M.StarfeltL.C.WhiteK.M.Building a flexible, voluntary donation panel: an exploration of donor willingnessTransfusion562015186–194
12.
BagotK.L.MasserB.M.WhiteK.M.StarfeltL.C.Recruiting and retaining plasmapheresis donors: a critical belief analysisTransfus. Apher. Sci5232015350–357
13.
BekkersR.WiepkingP.A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: eight mechanisms that drive charitable givingNonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. J. Consum Res4052011924–973
14.
BennettR.Factors influencing donation switching behaviour among charity supporters: an empirical investigationJ. Consum. Behav842009329–345
15.
BennettR.What else should I support? An empirical study of multiple cause donation behaviorJ. Nonprof. Public Sec. Mark24120121–25
16.
BennettR.Individual characteristics and the arousal of mixed emotions: consequences for the effectiveness of charity fundraising advertisementsInt. J. Nonprof. Volunt. Sec. Mark2022015188–209
17.
BertalliN.A.AllenK.J.McLarenC.E.TurkovicL.OsborneN.J.ConstantineC.C.A comparison of self-reported and record-linked blood donation history in an Australian cohortTransfusion511020112189–2198
18.
BurnettJ.J.Psychographic and demographic characteristics of blood donorsJ. Consum. Res198162–66
19.
ChangC.Guilt regulation: the relative effects of altruistic versus egoistic appeals for charity advertisingJ. Adv4332014211–227
20.
Charities Aid FoundationWorld Giving Index: A Global View of Giving Trends2013Charities Aid FoundationOnline
21.
Charities Aid FoundationWorld Giving Index 2014: A Global View of Giving Trends2014CAFOnline
22.
Council of EuropeGuide to the Preparation, Use and Quality Assurance of Blood Components2010EDQMStrasbourg
EhrenbergA.UnclesM.D.GoodhardtG.G.Understanding brand performance measures: using Dirichlet benchmarksJ. Bus. Res571220041307–1325
29.
FengS.Getting lapsed donors back: an empirical investigation of relationship management in the post-termination stageJ. Nonprof. Public Sec. Mark2622014127–141
30.
GermainM.GlynnS.A.SchreiberG.B.GélinasS.KingM.JonesM.Determinants of return behavior: a comparison of current and lapsed donorsTransfusion471020071862–1870
31.
Giving USA FoundationGiving USA 2011: The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 20102011Giving USA FoundationIndiana
GonçalvesH.Globalization and blood donors: how to improve the blood donation in the European Union (EU)ISBT Sci. Ser612011142–147
34.
GriffinD.GraceD.O'CassA.Blood donation: comparing individual characteristics, attitudes, and feelings of donors and nondonorsHealth Mark. Q.3132014197–212
35.
Kaplan-PolivyD.Determining priorities among donorsDonor Cultivation and the Donor Lifecycle Map: A New Framework for Fundraising2013John Wiley and SonsHoboken, NJ143–160
36.
KennedyR.McCollB.Brand growth at Mars, Inc.: how the global marketer embraced Ehrenberg's science with creativityJ. Advert. Res5222012270–276
37.
KennedyR.ScrivenJ.Nenycz-ThielM.When ‘significant’ is not significantInt. J. Market Res5652014591–607
38.
KesslerR.C.A descriptive model of emergency on-call blood donationNonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q.43–41975159–171
39.
KhodakaramiF.PetersenJ.A.VenkatesanR.Developing donor relationships: the role of the breadth of givingJ. Mark79201577–93
40.
LamD.MizerskiR.An investigation into gambling purchases using the NBD and NBD–Dirichlet modelsMarket Lett2032009263–276
41.
Lilly Family School of PhilanthropyGiving USA 2015 Highlights2015Giving USA
42.
LyonsM.McGregor-LowndesM.O'DonoghueP.Researching giving and volunteering in AustraliaAust. J. Soc. Issues4142006385–397
43.
McPheeW.N.Formal Theories of Mass Behaviour1963New YorkThe Free Press of Glencoe
44.
MerchantA.FordJ.SargeantA.‘Don't forget to say thank you’: the effect of an acknowledgement on donor relationshipsJ. Mark. Manag2672010593–611
45.
MerchantA.FordJ.B.RoseG.How personal nostalgia influences giving to charityJ. Bus. Res6462011610–616
O'ReillyN.AyerS.PegoraroA.LeonardB.Rundle-ThieleS.Toward an understanding of donor loyalty: demographics, personality, persuasion, and revenueJ. Nonprof. Public Sec. Mark241201265–81
48.
QuesterP.LimA.L.L.Product involvement/brand loyalty: is there a link?J. Prod. Brand Manag121200322–38
49.
ReichheldF.F.SasserW.E.J.Zero defections: quality comes to servicesHarvard Bus. Rev6851990105–111
50.
ReichheldF.F.TealT.The Loyalty Effect: The Hidden Force behind Growth, Profits, and Lasting Value1996Harvard Business School PressBoston, Massachusetts
51.
RhineC.FlanneryH.The Macroeconomics of Fundraising. Target AnalyticsCharleston, SC2015
52.
RiebeE.WrightM.SternP.SharpB.How to grow a brand: retain or acquire customers?J. Bus. Res6752014990–997
53.
RomaniukJ.WightS.The stability and sales contribution of heavy buying householdsJ. Consum. Behav141201513–20
54.
SargeantA.ShangJ.Growing Philanthropy in the United Kingdom2011Institute of Fundraising and Bristol University of West EnglandOnline
55.
SharpB.How Brands Grow2010Oxford University PressMelbourne
56.
SharpB.WrightM.GoodhardtG.Purchase loyalty is polarised into either repertoire or subscription patternsAust. Mark. J.10320027–20
57.
ShenA.TsaiC.Y.Are single-gift committed donors different from their multiple-gift counterparts?Int. J. Nonprof. Volunt. Sec. Mark1532010253–264
58.
ThomsonR.A.BethelJ.LoA.Y.OwnbyH.E.NassC.C.WilliamsA.E.Retention of “safe” blood donors. The retrovirus epidemiology donor studyTransfusion3841998359–367
59.
TuckerL.R.Profiling the heavy blood donorHealth Mark. Q.43–4198761–74
60.
UnclesM.D.EhrenbergA.Industrial buying behavior: aviation fuel contractsInt. J. Market Res71199056–68
61.
UnclesM.D.WrightM.Editorial: empirical generalisation in marketingAust. Mark. J.12320045–12
62.
UnclesM.D.EastR.LomaxW.Good customers: the value of customers by mode of acquisitionAust. Mark. J.2122013119–125
63.
van DongenA.RuiterR.AbrahamC.VeldhuizenI.Predicting blood donation maintenance: the importance of planning future donationsTransfusion542014821–827
64.
VeldhuizenI.van DongenA.Motivational differences between whole blood and plasma donors already exist before their first donation experienceTransfusion53820131678–1686
65.
WatersR.D.Applying relationship management theory to the fundraising process for individual donorsJ. Commun. Manag121200873–87
66.
WildmanJ.HollingsworthB.Blood donation and the nature of altruismJ. Health Econ2822009492–503
67.
WymerW.The influence of marketing scholarship's legacy on nonprofit marketingInt. J. Financ. Stud132013102–118
