Personally, I know of no other field so fraught with controversy as education of the
hearing impaired. Staunch advocates of oralism, of total communication, and of cued speech
alternately inspire and terrify parents with various tales of triumph and tragedy.
1
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SchwartzS.Choices in deafness. Rockville, MD:
Woodbine House, 1987.
2.
BaileyBJA tribute to Max Goldstein, M.D.: Founder and editor of the
Laryngoscope.Laryngoscope1996; 106:
535–44.
3.
GoldsteinMAAdvanced method in teaching the deaf.Laryngoscope1897; 2:
349–57.
4.
GoldsteinMAThe physician and the deaf child. Presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the
American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological, Washington, D.C., April 29,
1910.
5.
DolnickE.Deafness as culture.The Atlantic Monthly1993;272(3):37–53.
6.
BehrensTRLiebergottHWEducation of the deaf: The otolaryngologist's
role.Otolaryngol Clin North Am1971;4:423–30.
7.
RubenRJNeeds for the future: The role of the
otorhinolaryngologist.Otolaryngol Clin North Am1975;8:233–7.
8.
StewartIFAfter early identification what follows? A study of some aspects of deaf
education from an otolaryngological viewpoint.Laryngoscope1984;94:784–99.
