We report the first prospective study of the effect of partial middle turbinectomy on nasal airflow and resistance as measured objectively by active anterior rhinomanometry. Our study group consisted of 31 consecutive patients who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery with simultaneous partial middle turbinate resections. We found that all patients had significant improvement in nasal airflow (p < 0.001) and significant decrease in nasal resistance (p < 0.001). Thus we found no deleterious effect on nasal function. Additionally, we reviewed the literature on retrospective series in which patients had received partial middle turbinectomies and found no evidence that nasal function was impaired after surgery. We conclude that partial middle turbinectomy may be performed without adversely altering nasal function, as measured by active anterior rhinomanometry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MooreGFFreemanTJOgrenFPYonkerAJ. Extended follow-up of total inferior turbinate resection for relief of chronic nasal obstructionLaryngoscope1985;95:1095–9
2.
OphirDShapiraAMarshakG. Total inferior turbinectomy for nasal airway obstructionArch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1985;111:93–5
McCaffreyTKernE. Clinical evaluation of nasal obstructionArch Otolaryngol1979;105:542–5
10.
McCaffreyT. Rhinomanometry and diagnosis of nasal obstruction; nasal airway evaluation techniques related to surgeryFacial Plastic Surgery1990;7:266–73
11.
HasegawaMKernEB. The human nasal cycleMayo Clin Proc1977;53:28–34
12.
BridgerGPProctorDF. Maximum nasal inspiratory flow and nasal resistanceAnn Otolaryngol1970;79:481–8
13.
MertsJSMcCaffreyTVKernEB. Objective evaluation of anterior septal surgical reconstructionOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg1984;92:302–7
14.
ColeP. Rhinomanometry 1988: Practice and trendsLaryngoscope1989;99:311–5
15.
PallanchIFMcCaffreyTVKernEB. Normal nasal resistanceOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg1985;93:778–85
16.
NicklassonBSundenL. Rhinomanometry and septoplastyJ Laryngol Otol1982;96:991–5
17.
JalowayskiAYuhYKoziolJDavidsonT. Surgery for nasal obstruction —evaluation by rhinomanometryLaryngoscope1983;93:341–5
18.
FiebachAMatsckeR. Zur Stellung der Rhinomanometrie in der SeptumchirurgieLaryngorhinootologie1983;62:264–5
19.
JessenMIvarssonAMalmL. Nasal airway resistance and symptoms after functional septoplasty: Comparison of findings at 9 months and 9 yearsClin Otolaryngol1989;14:231–4
20.
ClementPAR. Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometryRhinology1984;22:151–5
21.
BromsPJonsonBMalmL. Rhinomanometry IV. A pre and postoperative evaluation in functional septoplastyActa Otolaryngol (Stockh)1982;94:523–9
22.
ClementPARKaufmanLRousseeuwP. Active anterior rhinomanometry in pre- and postoperative evaluation: Use of Broms' mathematical modelRhinology1983;21:121–33
23.
GordonAMcCaffreyTKernEPallanchJ. Rhinomanometry for preoperative and postoperative assessment of nasal obstructionOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg1989;101:20–6
24.
SipilaJISuonpaaJTLaippalaPJ. Sensation of nasal obstruction compared to rhinomanometry in patients referred for septoplasty and in patients with chronic rhinitisAm J Rhinol1994;8:113–6
25.
SuonpaaJTSipilaJILaippalaPJ. Do rhinomanometric findings predict subjective postoperative satisfaction? Long-term follow-up after septoplastyAm J Rhinol1993;7:71–5
26.
MorgensteinKMKriegerMK. Experiences in middle turbinectomyLaryngoscope1980;90:1596–603
27.
BiedlingmaierJF. Endoscopic sinus surgery with middle turbinate resection: Results and complicationsEar Nose Throat J1993;72:351–5
28.
LawsonW. The intranasal ethmoidectomy: Evolution and an assessment of the procedureLaryngoscope1994;104(part 2):1–49
