Phonatory results after laser surgery for glottic carcinoma

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the influence of type and extent of surgery on postoperative voice parameters after endoscopic laser resection for glottic carcinoma.

SETTING AND DESIGN: A multidisciplinary university-based head and neck cancer center. Objective and subjective measures of voice were correlated with type and extent of surgery following a standardized classification in a prospective study including 80 patients.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD: The postoperative mechanism of phonation was assessed by videostroboscopy 6 months after surgery at the earliest. A phonetogram was produced, and its area was calculated (relative phonetogram [RP]) in relation to a gender-different normal phonetogram. Two speech therapists (ST) and a trained otolaryngologist (TO) rated each voice independently for communication ability in a grade from 1 (poor) to 5 (near normal).

RESULTS: After simple cordectomy the means were as follows: RP = 24.8%, TO = 3.26, and ST = 3.33. When the anterior commissure was completely preserved, mean results were better (RP = 34%, TO = 3.92, ST = 3.83). Results were worse after extended cordectomy (RP = 14.7%, TO = 2.82, ST = 3.00) and transglottic resection (RP = 13.7%, TO = 2.30, ST = 2.86) but were similar within these two groups. The parameters RP, TO, and ST do not differ significantly between the group who had speech therapy after surgery (n = 33) and the group who did not (n = 47). Voice production at glottic level yields better results for every parameter than supraglottic substitute phonation. The amount of tissue removed was less significant.

CONCLUSION: Postoperative phonatory results correlate with the postoperative mechanism of phonation. There is no linear correlation with the amount of tissue removed. Comparison of similar types of resection preservation of the anterior commissure plays a key role. From the data in this study, there is no evidence for a significant benefit from speech therapy. The parameter RP is an effective and relatively simple parameter to complete auditory voice assessment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Jako

GJ.

Laser surgery of the vocal cords. Laryngoscope 1972; 82:2204–16.

2. Crockett

Reynolds

BN.

Laryngeal laser surgery. Otolaryngol Clinics Of North Am 1990;23:49–65.

3. Ossoff

Duncavage

Shapshay

Krespi

Sisson

GH.

Endoscopic laser arytenoidectomy revisited. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99:764–9.

4. Eckel

Thumfart

WF.

Laser surgery for the treatment of larynx carcinomas: indications, techniques, and preliminary results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:113–8.

5. Schultz-Coulon

Asche

Das Normstimmfeld—ein Vorschlag. Sprache Stimme Gehör 1988;12:5–8.

6. Hacki

Frittrang

Zywietz

Zupan

Verfahren zur statistischen Ermittlung von Stimmfeldgrenzen—Das Durchschnitts-stimmfeld. Sprache Stimme Gehör 1990;14:110–2.

7. Woodson

Rosen

Murry

. Assessing vocal function after chemoradiation for advanced laryngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:858–64.

8. Wetmore

Key

Suen

JY.

Laser therapy for T1 glottic carcinoma of the larynx. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; 112:853–5.

9. Rydell

Schalen

Fex

Elner

Voice evaluation before and after laser excision vs. radiotherapy of T1a glottic carcinoma. Acta Otolaryngol 1995; 115: 560–5.

10.

10. Casiano

Cooper

Lundy

Chandler

JR.

Laser cordectomy for T1 glottic carcinoma: a 10-year experience and videostroboscopic findings. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;104:831–7.

11.

11. Höfler

Bigenzahn

Voice quality following CO₂ laser cordectomy. Die Stimmqualitat nach CO₂-laserchordektomie. Laryngorhinootologie 1986; 65: 655–8.

12.

12. Lehmann

Bless

Brandenburg

JH.

An objective assessment of voice production after radiation therapy for stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the glottis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;98:121–9.

13.

13. Hirano

Hirade

Kawasaki

Vocal function following carbon dioxide laser surgery for glottic carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985;94:232–5.

14.

14. McGuirt

Blalock

Koufman

. Comparative voice results after laser resection or irradiation of T1 vocal cord carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:951–5.

15.

15. McGuirt

Blalock

Koufman

Feehs

RS.

Voice analysis of patients with endoscopically treated early laryngeal carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101:142–6.

16.

16. Heipcke

Pascher

Rohrs

[Vocal function after laser therapy.] Stimmfunktion nach Lasertherapie. HNO 1987; 35: 234–41.

17.

17. Ott

Klingholz

Willich

Kastenbauer

Die Bestimmung der Qualität der Sprechstimme nach Therapie von T1- und T2-Stimmlippenkarzinomen. Laryngorhinootologie 1992;71:236–41.

18.

18. Cragle

Brandenburg

JH.

Laser cordectomy or radiotherapy: cure rates, communication, and cost. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;108:648–54.

19.

19. Koufman

JA.

The endoscopic management of early squamous carcinoma of the vocal cord with the carbon dioxide surgical laser clinical experience and a proposed subclassification. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;95:531–7.