Microscopic examination of routine tonsillectomy specimens: Is it necessary?

Abstract

Controversy continues to exist regarding the routine histologic examining of tonsillectomy specimens. Proponents suggest that among other reasons, missing an important diagnosis such as occult malignancy or granulomatous disease and possible medicolegal consequences argue in favor of routine histologic examination. Others state that we should consider the very low yield of significant histologic findings in routine tonsillectomy specimens and its added cost. We performed a retrospective evaluation of all cases of patients who underwent tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy between January 1992 and July 1996. Two hundred eighty-eight charts were evaluable. Group 1 consisted of all tonsillectomy specimens that were subjected to gross examination only. Group 2 consisted of all tonsillectomy specimens that were subjected to gross examination as well as microscopic examination. In group 1, no abnormal gross findings were noted. Group 2 consisted of specimens from an older population with a mean age of 21.6 years. There were 43 patients older than 20 years old in group 2, and in all cases except four the preoperative clinical impression correlated with the microscopic findings. Occult malignancy was found in only one of these four patients. No cases of granulomatous disease were discovered. Overall, no patients except one had any change in postoperative treatment on the basis of the results of microscopic examination. We believe that routine microscopic examination of tonsillectomy specimens results in unnecessary cost and consumption of resources and time. Microscopic examination should be done in only selected cases such as in patients with grossly asymmetric tonsils or in patients with a history of malignancy.