A comparative study of the voice with sustained phonation of the vowel /a/ was made in 3 groups of male patients: (1) 20 patients receiving total laryngectomy for epidermoid carcinoma of the larynx who had acquired good voice quality after a phonatory fistuloplasty with a Herrmann voice prosthesis; (2) 20 patients undergoing total laryngectomy for epidermoid carcinoma of the larynx who had learned esophageal speech; and (3) 20 subjects with normal voices. Statistical analysis yielded significant differences in fundamental voice frequency between the 3 groups, with the patients with phonatory prostheses revealing the closest to a normal voice. For other parameters used, such as jitter, shimmer, and harmonics/noise ratio, voice quality with a phonatory prosthesis was similar to that obtained with esophageal speech.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GussembauerC. Ueber die erste durch Th Billroth am Menschen ausgefuhrte Kehlkopf-Exstirpation. Arch Klin Surg1874;17:343–56.
2.
SeemanM. Zur pathologie der Ösophagusstimme. Folia Phoniatr Logop1958;10:44–50.
3.
AlgabaJZuluetaACamachoJ, et al. Nueva prótesis fonatoriapara laringuectomizados. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp1987;4:231–4.
HerrmannI. Prótesis fonatoria de Herrmann. In: Ponencia Oficial de la XXVIII Reunión de la SEORL. Madrid: Editorial Garsi; 1988. p. 306–7.
6.
NijdamH. A new prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Arch Otol Rhinol Laryngol1982;237:27–33.
7.
PanjeWR. Prosthetic vocal rehabilitation following laryngectomy: The voice button. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1981;90:116–20.
8.
RoviraHCazalsYTraissacL. Evaluation de la qualité vocale. Approche expérimentale et modélisation de la voix prothétique du laryngectomisé. Ann Otolaryngol1991;108:417–23.
SingerMIBlomED. An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1980;89:529–33.
11.
MaxLSteursW. Vocal capacities in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers. Laryngoscope1996;106:93–6.
12.
MirallesJLCerveraT. Voice intelligibility in patients who have undergone laryngectomies. J Speech Hear Res1995;38:564–71.
13.
TosiO. Elementos de acústica y psicoacústica. In: MenaldiJackson J, editor. La voz normal. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Panamericana; 1993. p. 26–45.
14.
HallK. Variations across time in acoustics and electroglottographic measures of phonatory function in women with and without vocal nodules. J Speech Hear Res1995;38:783–93.
15.
SchaferRW. Scientific bases of human machine communication by voice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1995;92:9914–20.
16.
AlarcosANietoAAlarcosE, et al. Study of fistuloplastic speech quality. In: AlgabaJ, editor. Surgery and prosthetic voice restoration after total and subtotal laryngectomy. New York: Elsevier Science; 1996. p. 317–21.
17.
BertinoGBellomoAMianiC, et al. Spectrographic differences between tracheal-esophageal and esophageal voice. Folia Phoniatr Logop1996;48:255–61.
18.
RobbinsJFisherHBlomE, et al. A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production. J Speech Hear Disord1984;49:202–10.
19.
CobetaIRiveraTOrtizB. Valoración subjetiva de la voz e historia clínica. In: TapiaGarcía RCobetaI, editors. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de los trastornos de la voz. Madrid: Editorial Garsi SA; 1996. p. 54–74.
20.
AlarcosA. Spectrographie de la voix aesophagienne et trachéale. Rev Laryngol1974;95:157–74.
21.
RamónJLSprekelsenCMarínM, et al. Método de estudio de las frecuencias fundamentales y análisis espectrográfico de los dos primeros formantes de las vocales castellanas emitidas por cien sujetos normales. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp1979;30:399–414.
22.
FilterMHymanM. Relationship of acoustic parameters and perceptual ratings of esophageal speech. Percept Mot Skills1975;40:63–8.
23.
TiwariRSnowGLecluseF, et al. Observations on surgical rehabilitation of the voice after laryngectomy with Staffieri's method. J Otolaryngol1982;96:241–50.
24.
SandersonRAndersonSDenholmS, et al. The assessment of alaryngeal speech. Clin Otolaryngol1993;18:181–3.
