Let us take any historical or contemporary economic society. Would economic efficiency become better if such society erects and enforces institutions that prohibit its members from the exploitation of excludable groups that can be defined by race, ethnicity, etc.? This question actually makes no sense. One must first identity the boundary of society, i.e., who make up the objective function. Irrespective of how one defines efficiency, one cannot assess the efficiency of institutions without determining who is covered and who is excluded. Efficiency judgments can make sense only when one defines the social boundary.
ArrowK.J.Social Choice and Individual Values.New York: Wiley; 1951.
2.
ArrowK.J.Social Choice and Individual Values.2nd ed.New Haven: Yale University Press; 1963.
3.
BeckerG.S.A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence.Q J Econ.1983; 98: 371–400.
4.
BergsonA.A reformulation of certain aspects of welfare economics.Q J Econ.1938; 52: 310–34.
5.
BergsonA.On the concept of social welfare.Q J Econ.1954; 68: 232–52.
6.
BlackorbyC., DonaldsonD.A review article: The case against the use of the sum of compensating variations in cost-benefit analysis.Can J Econ.1990; 23: 471–94.
7.
CoaseR.The problem of social cost.J Law Econ.1960; 3: 1–44.
8.
DemsetzH.The problem of social cost: What problem? A critique of the reasoning of A.C. Pigou and R.H. Coase.Rev Law Econ.2011; 7(1): 1–13.
9.
FogelR.W., EngermanS.L.Time on the Cross, vol. 2. Boston: Little, Brown; 1974.
10.
GreenwaldB., StiglitzJ.Externalities in economies with imperfect information and incomplete markets.Q J Econ.1986; 101: 229–64.
11.
HarsanyiJ.C.Utilities, preferences, and substantive goods.Soc Choice Welf.1997; 14: 129–45.
KaldorN.Welfare Propositions in Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.Econ J.1939; 49: 549–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224835.
14.
KempM.C., NgY-K. On the existence of social welfare functions: Social orderings and social decision functions.Economica.1976; 43: 59–66.
15.
KempM.C., NgY-K. Individualistic social welfare functions under ordinalism: A reply to Mayston.Math Soc Sci.1983; 4: 305–7.
16.
KhalilE.L.Rationality and social labor in Marx.Crit Rev.1990; 4: 239–65.
17.
KhalilE.L.The implication for socialism of Marx's theory of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall.J Hist Econ Thought.1994; 16: 292–309.
18.
KhalilE.L.What Determines the Boundary of Civil Society? Hume, Smith and the Justification of European Exploitation of non-Europeans.Theoria.2013; 59: 26–49.
19.
KhalilE.L.Distinguishing Injustice, Exploitation and Harm: The Impossibility Result.Theoria.2017; 64: 24–52.
20.
KruegerA.The political economy of the rent-seeking society.Am Econ Rev.1974; 64: 291–303.
21.
MarxK.Capital, vol. 1, intro. by Ernest Mandel.Harmondsworth: Penguin; London: New Left Books; 1976.
22.
Mas-ColellA., WhinstonM., GreenJ.R.Microeconomic Theory.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
23.
MitchellW.Doing well while intending good: Cases in political exploitation.J Theor Politics.1993; 5: 317–48.
24.
NgY-K. Towards welfare biology: Evolutionary economics of animal consciousness and suffering.Biol Philos.1995; 10: 255–85.
25.
NgY-K. Utility, informed preference, or happiness: Following Harsanyi's argument to its logical conclusion.Soc Choice Welf.1999; 16: 197–216.
26.
NgY-K. Eternal Coase and external costs: A case for bilateral taxation and amenity rights.Eur J Polit Econ.2007; 23: 641–59.
27.
NorthD., ThomasR.The Rise of the Western World.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1973.
28.
NorthD., WallisJ., WeingastB.Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
29.
NussbaumM.C.Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership.Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2006.
30.
OgilvieS.‘Whatever is, is right?’ Economic institutions in pre-industrial Europe.Econ Hist Rev.2007; 60: 649–84.
31.
OgilvieS.Institutions and European Trade. Merchant Guilds, 1000–1800.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
32.
PosnerR.A.Utilitarianism, economics, and legal theory.J Leg Stud1979; 8: 103–40.
33.
PosnerR.A.Economic Analysis of Law.7th ed.Austin: Kluwer; 2007.
34.
RawlsJ.A Theory of Justice.Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1971.
35.
RawlsJ.The Law of Peoples: with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”.Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2001.
36.
SamuelsonP.A.Foundations of Economic Analysis.Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1947.
37.
SamuelsonP.A.Reaffirming the existence of ‘reasonable’ Bergson-Samuelson social welfare functions. Economica.New Ser.1977; 44: 81–8.
38.
SenA.K.Social choice theory: A re-examination.Econometrica.1977; 45: 53–89.
39.
SenA.K.Development as Freedom.2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
40.
SenA.K.The Idea of Justice.London: Allen Lane; 2009.
41.
SingerP.Animal Liberation.New York: Ecco; 2002.
42.
TullockG.The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft.Western Econ J.1967; 5: 224–32.
