Within the context of the “particularistic mobility thesis” we examine African American/White differences in the incidence, determinants and timing of mobility into management at a refined level, namely, when groups share similar “rank and file” and “elite blue collar” working class jobs. Findings from a Panel Study of Income Dynamics sample of men support theory and indicate that from both job categories, African Americans, relative to Whites, have lower rates of mobility, reach management through a route that is relatively formal and structured by a traditional range of stratification-based causal factors and take longer to reach management. Further, as predicted by theory, racial disadvantage experienced by African Americans are greater among those tracked from rank and file than elite blue collar jobs. Discussed are implications of the findings for understanding African American disadvantage in the American labor market on both an intra-and inter-generational basis.
AllisonP.Event history analysis.Boulder: Sage; 1984.
2.
BaldiS., McBrierD.Do the determinants of promotion differ for blacks and whites?Work Occup.1997; 24: 478–97.
3.
BielbyW.Minority vulnerability in privileged occupations: why do African American advisors earn less than whites in a large financial services firm?Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci.2012; 639: 13–32.
KluegelJ.The causes and cost of racial exclusion from job authority.Am Sociol Rev.1978; 43: 285–301.
19.
LeichtK., FennellM.Professional work: a sociological approach.Malden: Blackwell; 2001.
20.
MalamudD.The last minuet.Mich Law Rev.1995; 58: 936–1018.
21.
MaumeD.Glass ceilings and glass escalators.Work Occup.1999; 26: 483–509.
22.
MollerS., RubinB.The contours of stratification in service oriented economies.Soc Sci Res.2008; 37: 1039–60.
23.
MuellerC., PriceJ.Employee commitment: resolving some issues.Work Occup.1992; 19: 211–36.
24.
NockS., RossiP.Household types and social standing.Soc Forces.1979; 57: 1325–45.
25.
ParkH., SandefurG.Racial and ethnic differences in the labor market experiences of young adults.Soc Sci Res.2003; 32: 347–75.
26.
PettigrewT.New black-white patterns: how best to conceptualize them.Annu Rev Sociol.1985; 9: 1–23.
27.
PettigrewT., MartinJ.Shaping the organizational context for black American inclusion.J Soc Issues.1987; 43: 41–78.
28.
ReskinB.The proximate causes of discrimination.Contemp Sociol.2000; 29: 319–28.
29.
PowellG., ButterfieldA.Investigating the glass ceiling: phenomenon: an empirical study of actual promotions to top management.Acad Manag J.1994; 37: 68–86.
30.
RoscignoV.The face of discrimination.New York: Rowman and Littlefield; 2007.
31.
SetterstonR., MayerK.The measurement of age, age structuring, and the life-course.Annu Rev Sociol.1992; 23: 233–61.
32.
SheridenJ.Factors that influence the probability of employee promotions: a comparative analysis of human capital, organizational screening, and gender/race discrimination theories.J Bus Psychol.1997; 11: 372–85.
33.
SmithR., ElliottJ.Findings from bottom-up ascription and social closure.Soc Probl.2002; 48: 258–76.
34.
SmithR.do the determinants of promotion differ for white men versus women and minorities?Am Behav Sci.2005; 48: 1182–99.
35.
SmithR.Race, gender, and Authority in the Workplace: theory and research.Annu Rev Sociol.2002; 28: 509–42.
36.
SmithR.Money, benefits, and power: a test of the glass ceiling and glass escalator hypotheses.Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci.2012; 639: 149–72.
37.
SkrentnyJ.Color lines, immigration, and civil rights.Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2001.
38.
StainbackK., Tomaskovic-DeveyD., SkaggsS.Organizational approaches to inequality: inertia, relative power, and environments.Annu Rev Sociol.2010; 36: 225–47.
TeachmanJ.Analyzing social processes—life tables and proportional hazards models.Soc Sci Res.1983; 12: 263–301.
41.
Tomaskovic-DeveyD., SkaggsS.An establishment-level test of the statistical discrimination hypothesis.Work Occup.1999; 26: 422–45.
42.
Tomaskovic-DeveyD., StainbackK.Discrimination and desegregation: equal opportunity progress in U.S. private sector workplaces since the civil rights acer.Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci.2007; 609: 49–84.
43.
TsuiA., XinK., EganT.Relational demography: the missing link in vertical dyad linkage. In: JacksonS., RudermanM., editors. Diversity and work teams: research paradigms for a changing workplace.Washington: American Psychological Association; 1995. p. 97–129.
44.
TsuiA., O'ReillyC.Beyond simple demographic effects: the importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads.Acad Manag J.1989; 32: 402–23.
45.
WilsonG., Sakura-LemessyI., WestJ.Reaching the top: racial differences in mobility paths to upper-tier occupations.Work Occup.1999; 26: 165–86.
46.
WilsonG., McBrierD.Race and loss of privilege: African American/white differences in the determinants of job layoffs from upper-tier occupations.Sociol Forum.2005; 20: 301–23.
47.
WilsonG., RoscignoV.Race and the dynamics of downward mobility from upper-tier occupations across the early work-career.Soc Sci Res.2010; 39: 67–77.
48.
WilsonG.Pathways to power: racial differences in the determinants of job authority.Soc Probl.1997; 42: 48–64.
