The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique is typically applied to gender or racial earnings gaps with the goal of determining the percent of the gap that can be attributed to differences in attributes between groups and to labor market discrimination. We apply this technique to the racial gap in achievement tests with the goal of measuring the relative racial bias of these tests. The Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and the Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT) were administered to respondents from the 1997 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Decomposition results indicate that up to 49.5 % of the white-black gap in the PIAT is explained by racial differences in average attributes. The corresponding figure for the ASVAB is 44.7 %. Since the same sample and specification are used in estimating ASVAB and PIAT scores, the difference in the percent of the gaps due to attributes can be ascribed to test score bias and not omitted variable bias. Therefore, the results suggest that the “discrimination” or bias of the ASVAB is greater than the PIAT.
ChiswickB.“Differences in Education and Earnings Across Racial and Ethnic Groups: Tastes, Discrimination and Investments in Child Quality.”Q J Econ.1988 August, 571–597.
8.
ColeN.Bias in testing.Am Psychol.1981; 36(10): 1067–77.
9.
ColemanJ., CampbellE., HobsonC., McPartlandJ., MoodM., WeinfeldE.. Equality in educational opportunity.Washington, D.C: Department of Health, Education and Welfare; 1966.
10.
DarityW.The functionality of market-based discrimination.Int J Soc Econ.2001; 28(10): 980–6.
11.
DarityW., GuilkeyD., WinfreyW.Explaining differences in economic performance among racial and ethnic groups in the USA.Am J Econ Sociol.1996; 55: 41–425.
12.
DuncanK., SandyJ.“Explaining the performance gap between public and private school students,”.East Econ J.2007; 33: 177–91. Spring.
13.
ElliottJ.R., SmithR.A.Race, gender and workplace power.Am Sociol Rev.2004; 69: 365–86.
14.
FergusonR.Teacher's perceptions and expectations and the black-white test score gap.Urban Educ.2003; 38(4): 460–507.
15.
FordhamS., OgbuJ.Black Students’ school success; coping with the burden on acting white.Anthropol Educ Q.1986; 18: 312–34.
FreyM., DettermanD.Scholastic assessment of g? the relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability.Psychol Sci.2004; 15: 373–8.
18.
FryerR., LevittS.“Understanding the black-white test score gap in the first two years of school”.Rev Econ Stat.2004; 86(No. 2): 447–64.
19.
GreenR.Racial and ethnic bias in test construction.Monterey: CTB/McGraw-Hill; 1971.
20.
GrissmerD., KirbyS., BerendsM., WilliamsonS.Student achievement and the changing American family.Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, MR-488-LE; 1994.
21.
HanushekE., RivkinS.Harming the best: How schools affect the black-white achievement gap.J Policy Anal.2009; 28(3): 366–93.
22.
HarrisA.“The economic and educational state of black Americans in the 21st century: should we be optimistic or concerned?”.Rev Black Political Econ.2010; 37(Nos 3–4): 257–62.
23.
HarrisonRussell. “Linkages between Schools size and Adverse Educational Outcomes in New Jersey-Evidence of Failing Test Scores, School Violence, and Inefficiency Costs.” A Report of the Commission on Business Efficiency of Public Schools. 2003. “School Size, Violence, Achievement, and Cost. September. www.njleg.state.nj.us/legislativepub/buseff_report.pdf
24.
HedgesL.V., NowellA.Black-white test score convergence since 1965. In: JencksC., PhillipsM., editors. The black-white test score gap.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1998.
25.
HunterJ., SchmidtF.Racial and gender bias in ability and achievement tests: resolving the apparent paradox.Psychol Publ Policy Law.2000; 6(1): 151–8.
26.
JannB.The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models.Stata J.2008; 8(4): 453–79.
27.
JencksC.Racial bias in testing. In: JencksC., PhillipsM., editors. The black-white test score gap.Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press; 1998. p. 1998.
28.
JencksC., and PhillipsM., eds., The Black-White Test Score Gap, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press, 1998.
29.
KaufmanA., KaufmanN.K-ABC: Kaufman assessment battery for children.Circle Pines: American Guidance Services; 1983.
30.
KruegerA.“Economic considerations of class size”.Econ J.2003; 133: F34–63.
31.
KruegerA.“Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions”.Q J Econ.1999. May, 497–532.
32.
KruegerA., WhitmoreD.“Would smaller class sizes close the black-white achievement gap?” Working paper #451, Princeton University.Princeton: Industrial Relations Section; 2001.
33.
LamdinD.Testing for the effect of school size on student achievement within a school district.Educ Econ.1995; 3(1): 33–43.
34.
LeeV., SmithJ.High school size: which works best for whom?Educ Eval Policy Anal.1997; 19: 205–77.
McEwanP.J., MarshallJ.H.Why does academic achievement vary across countries? Evidence from Cuba and Mexico.Educ Econ.2004; 12(3): 205–17.
37.
McEwanP.J., TrowbridgeT.The achievement of indigenous students in Guatemalan primary schools.Int J Educ Dev.2007; 27: 61–76.
38.
McMillianM., MunkT., BumpersE., ConealW.Creating a testable, estimable model to inform our response to the test-score gap crisis.Rev Black Political Econ.2010; 37: 257–62.
39.
MedleyD., QuirkT.The application of a factorial design to the study of cultural bias in general cultural items in the national teacher examination.J Educ Meas.1974; 11(4): 235–45.
OaxacaR., RansomM.Identification in detailed wage decompositions.Rev Econ Stat.1999; 81(1): 154–7.
44.
PatacchiniE., ZenouY.“The racial test score gap and parental involvement in Britain.” IZA DP No. 2613.Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA); 2007.
45.
PhillipsM.“Understanding ethnic differences in academic achievement: Empirical lessons from national data”. In: GrissmerD., RossM., editors. Analytical issues in the assessment of student achievement.Washington, DC: Us Department of Education, Center for Education Statistics; 2000. p. 103–32.
46.
RobinsonK.Black-white inequality in reading and math across K-12 schooling: a synthetic cohort perspective.Rev Black Political Econ.2010; 37: 263–73.
47.
RodgersW., SpriggsW.What does the AFQT really measure: race, wages, schooling and the AFQT.Rev Black Political Econ.1996; 24(4): 13–46.
48.
SandyJ., DuncanK.Examining the achievement test score gap between urban and suburban students.Educ Econ.2010; 18(3): 297–315.
49.
ScheunemanJ.A method of assessing bias in test items.J Educ Meas.1979; 16(3): 143–52.
50.
SchratzM., andB. Wellens. “Minority Panel Review in the Development of Achievement Tests.” Paper presented a the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA. 1981.
51.
SeatonE.What the achievement gap conversation is missing.Rev Black Political Econ.2010; 37: 275–7.
52.
SteeleC., SpencerS., AronsonJ.Contending with group image: the psychology of stereotype and social identity threat.Adv Exp Soc Psychol.2002; 34: 379–440.
ThermstromA., ThermstromS.“No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning.New York: Simon and Schuster;2003.
55.
Tomaskovic-DeveyD., ThomasM., JohnsonK.Race and the accumulation of human capital across the career: a theoretical model and fixed effects application.Am J Sociol.2005; 111(1): 58–89.
56.
TysonK.Integration interrupted: Tracking, black students, and acting white after brown.New York: Oxford University Press;2011.
57.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), Reading and Math Assessments, 2009. http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
58.
U.S. Department of Labor (2010). “Highlights of Women's Earnings in 2009: Report 1025,”U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics:http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpswom2009.pdf
59.
VarsF., BowenW.“Scholastic aptitude test scores, race and academic performance in selective colleges and universities”. In: JencksC., PhillipsM., editors. The black-white test score Gap.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1998. p. 457–79.
