The ‘triradiate bump’: A novel radiographic sign that may confound assessment of acetabular retroversion

Abstract

Purpose

The triradiate cartilage transiently projects medially within the pelvic brim around the time of triradiate closure, mimicking the ischial spine sign. The purpose of this study was to characterize this newly identified radiographic sign using a longitudinal radiographic study.

Methods

We identified 72 subjects from a longitudinal radiographic study of healthy adolescents, each with at least four consecutive, annual anterior−posterior radiographs of the left hip, including physeal closure. Images were reviewed to identify the presence of the triradiate bump, the year it was most prominent, and the number of years relative to triradiate closure after which it had completely remodeled.

Results

The transient medial projection of the triradiate cartilage (triradiate bump) was identified in 26/40 (65 %) females and 22/32 (69 %) males (p = 0.74). The medial projection of the triradiate cartilage was most prominent at 10.8 ± 0.8 years of age in females and 12.6 ± 0.7 years of age in males (p < 0.001). The triradiate cartilage projected medially a mean of 4.7 ± 0.8 or 5.1 ± 1.4 mm for females and males, respectively (p = 0.29), but remodeled completely in all cases around triradiate closure.

Conclusions

The transient medial projection of the triradiate cartilage within the pelvic brim, the ‘triradiate bump sign’, is a common radiographic finding in healthy adolescents around the time of closure of the triradiate cartilage that may mimic the ischial spine sign. These two signs can be distinguished as the projection of the ischial spine is located more inferiorly within the pelvic brim and the triradiate bump has a horizontal limb of radiolucency extending to its medial border.

Keywords

Acetabular retroversion Ischial spine sign Hip development Radiographic study Femoroacetabular impingement

Introduction

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a frequent source of hip pain in adolescents and young adults. Increasing attention has been focused on the evaluation of adolescents over the past decade as studies have revealed that adolescents involved in vigorous sporting activity are at an increased risk for the development of cam morphology in FAI [1–6]. While isolated cam (or pincer) may cause FAI, many patients instead present with a mixed ‘cam and pincer’ deformity, where hip morphology is notable for both decreased femoral head/neck offset and acetabular retroversion. Acetabular retroversion increases the likelihood of mechanical impingement with hip flexion and internal rotation [7, 8] which can subsequently lead to damage to the anterior labrum and adjacent cartilage [9]. Consequently, evaluation of an adolescent patient with hip pain involves thorough clinical and radiographic assessment for acetabular retroversion.

Radiographic assessment of acetabular retroversion includes evaluation for the crossover sign (COS) and the ischial spine sign (ISS). These two radiographic markers are present on anterior−posterior (AP) pelvis plain films and are reflective of cranial acetabular retroversion. Jamali et al. [10] first described the COS as a marker of acetabular retroversion seen when the anterior wall of the acetabulum extends further laterally than the posterior wall on an AP pelvis radiograph. Kalberer et al. [11] first identified the ISS as the medial projection of the ischial spine within the pelvic brim. They demonstrated that the ISS was strongly predictive of acetabular retroversion (sensitivity 91 %, specificity 98 %) and proposed that it is simpler to evaluate than the COS as it relies only on identifying “a triangular-shaped radio-opaque structure that points medially from the pelvic brim toward the pelvic inlet” [11]. While elegant in its simplicity, the ISS may be prone to misinterpretation in adolescent patients.

We identified a novel radiographic sign (seen on AP plain films of the pelvis) where the triradiate cartilage transiently projects medially within the pelvic brim around the time of triradiate closure, mimicking the ISS (Fig. 1). The purpose of this study is to characterize this newly identified radiographic sign using a longitudinal radiographic study.

Fig. 1

Appearance and remodeling of the ‘triradiate bump’ sign in an adolescent female (top row) and male (bottom row). This is a transient medial projection of the triradiate cartilage which mimics the ischial spine sign. The top row demonstrates how the bump resolves over a 5-year course, while the bottom row demonstrates how the bump becomes more prominent near the time of triradiate closure before resolving

Methods

For the purpose of this study, we utilized the Brush Inquiry, a historical longitudinal radiographic study of healthy adolescents. The Brush Inquiry includes images of >4,000 male and female adolescents from the Greater Cleveland area enrolled between 1926 and 1942. All subjects in this study were enrolled either through referral by primary care physicians or through ‘health contests’ at local schools. These checkpoints served as a means to ensure that all subjects were free of obvious disease or deformity [12]. As part of an annual radiographic series, plain films of the left hip were obtained for each subject annually throughout their participation in the study. From the Brush Inquiry population, radiographic films from an initial random sample population of 150 subjects were uploaded to a digital database. Images from each subject were reviewed and subjects were excluded if their film series did not include at least four consecutive, annual AP radiographs of the left hip, including physeal closure. Subjects were also excluded if any of these radiographs were damaged, contained inadequate contrast or clarity, or did not contain the pubic symphysis in the field of view to allow for measurement of rotation. Pelvic rotation and tilt have been shown to affect coxometric indices [13–15], and specifically have been shown to influence radiographic interpretation of markers of acetabular retroversion [14–16]. A previous study by Kakaty et al. [16] confirmed that sensitivity and specificity of the ISS are maintained with pelvic rotation of up to 9° and pelvic tilt of up to 12°. Since the goal of this study was to characterize a radiographic sign which may mimic the ISS, we limited our evaluation of films to those in which one might expect to see a valid ischial spine sign, i.e., those with <10° of pelvic tilt or rotation. In order to accomplish this, we utilized standardized radiographic calibration markers present on each film and measurement of the sacrococcygeal joint to pubic symphysis (SCJ-PS) distance. Previous studies reveal that 2 cm of horizontal and vertical SCJ-PS distance correspond to 10° of pelvic rotation and tilt, respectively [14, 15]. All films were subsequently screened to confirm that they met these strict inclusion criteria. Figure 2 depicts a flow chart that characterizes the screening and inclusion criteria for the study's sample population.

Fig. 2

Flow chart characterizing the screening and inclusion/exclusion criteria for the study's sample population

From this initial sample population, we identified 72 subjects who met the above criteria. Images were reviewed to identify the presence of the ‘triradiate bump’, a transient medial projection of the triradiate cartilage within the pelvic brim around the time of physeal closure. We evaluated each series of films to determine the year at which the triradiate bump was most prominent, and the number of years relative to triradiate closure after which it had completely remodeled. All images were processed and measured with Image J software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Triradiate bump prominence was measured by first overlaying a best-fit ellipse on the radiographic projection of the iliopectineal line. The prominence of the ‘triradiate bump’ was measured as the amount of medial projection of the triradiate cartilage (in mm) from a point perpendicular to the tangent of a best-fit ellipse overlaying the iliopectineal line. (Fig 3). The minimum amount of medial projection considered a positive ‘triradiate bump’ was 3 mm as we noticed that triradiate cartilage medial ‘lipping’ would commonly break the best-fit ellipse by 1–2 mm without reflecting significant medial projection of the triradiate cartilage (Fig. 4). Differences between genders were compared for rate of incidence, age at prominence, and remodeling relative to triradiate closure.

Fig. 3

The prominence of the ‘triradiate bump’ is measured as the amount of medial projection of the triradiate cartilage (white brackets) from a point perpendicular to the tangent of a best-fit ellipse overlaying the iliopectineal line

Fig. 4

The minimum amount of medial projection of the triradiate cartilage considered a ‘positive’ triradiate bump sign was 3 mm. This cut-off was set as we noted medial lipping of the triradiate cartilage commonly broke the projected best-fit ellipse by 1–2 mm but did not reflect significant medial projection of the triradiate cartilage

Statistics

All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (IBM Corp. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) were determined for each of the above variables. Comparison of the prevalence of the triradiate bump between genders was performed using the chi-squared test. Differences between genders in age at triradiate bump prominence, amount of medial projection (in mm), prominence relative to triradiate closure, and age at complete remodeling were compared using Student's t tests. Significance for all tests was set at p < 0.05. Twenty plain films were re-measured by the initial author (WZM) and a second grader (RTL) to confirm the reliability of measurement of the medial projection of the triradiate bump. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was determined through determination of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The results of the intraclass correlation coefficients were interpreted as follows—<0.40 was considered poor, 0.40–0.59 was considered fair, 0.60–0.74 was considered good, and >0.74 was considered excellent [17–19].

Results

A total of 423 AP plain films of the left hip were reviewed in 72 subjects (mean 5.9 ± 1.2 films per subject). There were 32 males and 40 females included in the study whose ages at the time of participation ranged from 10–18 years. The transient medial projection of the triradiate cartilage (‘triradiate bump’) was identified in 26/40 (65 %) females and 22/32 (69 %) males (p = 0.74). In all cases, the projection was qualitatively noted to be just superior to the ischial spine (Fig. 5). There was a wide range in the amount of medial projection of the triradiate bump from 3.2 to 8.1 mm; however, there was no significant difference in the amount of medial projection between males (5.1 ± 1.4 mm) and females (4.7 ± 0.8 mm, p = 0.29). The medial projection of the triradiate cartilage was most prominent at 10.8 ± 0.8 years of age in females and 12.6 ± 0.7 years of age in males (p < 0.001). This projection was most prominent at 2.1 ± 0.6 or 1.8 ± 0.7 years before triradiate closure for females and males, respectively (p = 0.15). The medial prominence of the triradiate cartilage completely remodeled in all cases at a mean of 0.1 ± 0.3 or 0.3 ± 0.5 years after triradiate closure in females and males, respectively (p = 0.22).

Fig. 5

Anterior−posterior plain film of the pelvis of a female aged 11 years and 11 months demonstrating medial prominence of both the ischial spines (white dashed line) and the triradiate cartilages (‘triradiate bump’, black dashed line). Note the triradiate cartilage is located superior to the ischial spine and has a horizontal limb of radiolucency

Inter- and intra-oberserver reliability

Determination of intraclass correlation coefficients revealed excellent inter-observer agreement between the two authors (0.92) and excellent intra-observer agreement within the same grader's measurement (0.95).

Discussion

Radiographic assessment of acetabular retroversion remains central in the evaluation for FAI. Two radiographic signs have been identified on the AP pelvis film that signal acetabular retroversion—the COS and the ISS. The ISS is thought to be present in between 7 and 30 % of asymptomatic subjects [20, 21] and was proposed as a simpler alternative to the COS where clinicians only needed to identify “a triangular-shaped radio-opaque structure that points medially from the pelvic brim toward the pelvic inlet” [11]. Although the ISS represents a useful radiographic tool in the assessment of acetabular version, we have demonstrated that it should be interpreted cautiously in the adolescent hip.

The transient medial projection of the triradiate cartilage within the pelvic brim (the ‘triradiate bump’ sign) is a common radiographic finding in healthy adolescents which may mimic prominence of the ischial spine. Through the use of a longitudinal radiographic study, we demonstrated that the triradiate cartilage projects medially within the pelvic brim in the majority of healthy adolescents. This medial prominence peaks approximately 2 years before triradiate closure and then completely remodels around the time of triradiate closure. This finding was similarly present in both males and females.

Misinterpretation of the medial prominence of the triradiate cartilage as an ISS may lead to the false assumption that a patient has acetabular retroversion. However, the two signs can be distinguished as the projection of the ischial spine is located more inferiorly within the pelvic brim. In addition, the triradiate cartilage can be visualized within the triradiate bump, and thus a triradiate bump has a horizontal limb of radiolucency extending to its medial border (Fig. 5). Finally, the presence or absence of the COS, another indication of acetabular retroversion, could be used to further evaluate version. Recognition of these radiographic markers will help distinguish the ISS from the triradiate bump and prevent misinterpretation of acetabular version in the adolescent hip.

Pelvic rotation or tilt can also lead to misinterpretation of films and radiographic signs, including the ISS and the COS [16, 22]. Consequently, one of the most important tools in radiographic evaluation of the adolescent hip is recognition of a proper AP pelvis film. A proper film is obtained with the patient supine with their legs internally rotated 15° and the X-ray tube placed 120 cm away from the film, centered on the midpoint between the pubic symphysis and a line connecting the two anterior superior iliac spines [23]. Although there are slight variations between genders, an appropriate AP pelvis film should position the tip of the coccyx approximately 1–3 cm from the pubic symphysis. This technique was used in our study to confirm appropriate pelvic tilt and rotation. Additionally, symmetry of the obturator for aminae, iliac wings, and radiographic teardrops are also useful markers of appropriate positioning [22]. Using these radiographic cues, one can avoid the pitfalls of misinterpretation of pelvic radiographs.

The strengths and limitations of this study both stem from the use of a historical longitudinal radiographic collection. The use of the Brush Inquiry afforded us the unique opportunity to study the nuanced radiographic development of the adolescent hip through annual plain films of the left hip from childhood through to skeletal maturity. Characterization of the presence and remodeling of the triradiate bump would not have otherwise been possible. However, the use of these historical films was at times limited by poor contrast or rotation of the films. Our strict inclusion criteria of adequate contrast and <10° of pelvic rotation or tilt (as judged by the sacrococcygeal-pubic symphysis distance) helped to assure that only quality AP films of the left hip were included the study. Furthermore, since the study utilized AP films of the hip rather than AP pelvis films, differences in beam centering may lead to slight variations in radiographic anatomy that may have influenced our measurements; however, we have identified the same radiographic findings on AP pelvis films (Fig. 5) and suspect these influences are minimal. Finally, although these films were obtained approximately 80 years ago (1926–1942), we believe the data are still relevant as the development of a adolescent hip appears to follow a similar timeline in current radiographic studies [24] compared to studies using this collection [25, 26].

It is not entirely clear why the triradiate edge becomes so prominent two years before triradiate closure. We are not aware of any other growth plates within the body which behave similarly. However, other morphological changes such as physeal cupping have been described in the years preceding maturity of the physis. In the proximal and distal femur, cupping has been proposed as a physiologic mechanism to stabilize the physis during a time when the undulations within the physis are decreasing in relative size with growth [27–29]. It is possible that the extension of the triradiate cartilage into the medial pelvis represents a similar mechanism to confer stability to the growth plate.

In summary, we demonstrated that the transient medial prominence of the triradiate cartilage (the ‘triradiate bump’ sign) occurs regularly in healthy adolescent hips just before triradiate closure. This medial projection within the pelvic brim may mimic the ISS and falsely suggest the presence of acetabular retroversion. However, the two radiographic signs can be distinguished by the fact that the triradiate bump is located superior to the ischial spine, has a horizontal limb of radiolucency (from the triradiate cartilage), and completely remodels around the time of triradiate closure. Although we continue to recommend the use of plain films of the pelvis as an initial radiographic study in the adolescent evaluation for FAI, we recommend close scrutiny of radiographs in this unique population to prevent misinterpretation of radiographic markers of acetabular retroversion.

Footnotes

Funding

There were no external sources of support for this study.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Raymond Liu receives royalties from Orthopediatrics paid directly to the institution to fund research efforts. Drs. Li and Morris declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this study in accordance with ethical standards interest.

References

Kapron

, Anderson

, Aoki

. Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in collegiate football players: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Jt Surg Am (2011); 93 (19): e1111–e11110

10.2106/JBJS.K.00544

Kapron

, Peters

, Aoki

. The prevalence of radiographic findings of structural hip deformities in female collegiate athletes. Am J Sports Med (2015); 43 (6): 1324–1330

10.1177/0363546515576908

Siebenrock

, Ferner

, Noble

, Santore

, Werlen

, Mamisch

. The cam-type deformity of the proximal femur arises in childhood in response to vigorous sporting activity. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2011); 469 (11): 3229–3240 10.1007/s11999-011-1945-43183218

Siebenrock

, Kaschka

, Frauchiger

, Werlen

, Schwab

. Prevalence of cam-type deformity and hip pain in elite ice hockey players before and after the end of growth. Am J Sports Med (2013); 41 (10): 2308–2313

10.1177/0363546513497564

Agricola

, Bessems

, Ginai

. The development of Cam-type deformity in adolescent and young male soccer players. Am J Sports Med (2012); 40 (5): 1099–1106

10.1177/0363546512438381

Agricola

, Heijboer

, Ginai

. A cam deformity is gradually acquired during skeletal maturation in adolescent and young male soccer players: a prospective study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med (2014); 42 (4): 798–806

10.1177/0363546514524364

Siebenrock KA, Schoeniger R, Ganz R, 2003. Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 85-A(2): 278−86

Reynolds

, Lucas

, Klaue

. Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Jt Surg Br (1999); 81 (2): 281–288

10.1302/0301-620X.81B2.8291

Myers

, Eijer

, Ganz

. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement after periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1999); 363: 93–99

10.1097/00003086-199906000-00012

10.

Jamali

, Mladenov

, Meyer

. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the “cross-over-sign”. J Orthop Res (2007); 25 (6): 758–765

10.1002/jor.20380

11.

Kalberer

, Sierra

, Madan

, Ganz

, Leunig

. Ischial spine projection into the pelvis: a new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008); 466 (3): 677–683 10.1007/s11999-007-0058-62505226

12.

Nelson

, Hans

, Broadbent

Jr , Dean

. The brush inquiry: an opportunity to investigate health outcomes in a well-characterized cohort. Am J Hum Biol (2000); 12 (1): 1–9

10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(200001/02)12:1<1::AID-AJHB1>3.0.CO;2-3

13.

Bom

, Groote

, Vincken

, Beek

, Bartels

. Pelvic rotation and tilt can cause misinterpretation of the acetabular index measured on radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2011); 469 (6): 1743–1749 10.1007/s11999-011-1781-63094614

14.

Tannast

, Zheng

, Anderegg

. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2005); 438: 182–190

10.1097/01.blo.0000167669.26068.c5

15.

Bittersohl

, Freitas

, Zaps

. EOS imaging of the human pelvis: reliability, validity, and controlled comparison with radiography. J Bone Jt Surg Am (2013); 95 (9): e581–e589

10.2106/JBJS.K.01591

16.

Kakaty

, Fischer

, Hosalkar

, Siebenrock

, Tannast

. The ischial spine sign: does pelvic tilt and rotation matter?. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010); 468 (3): 769–774

10.1007/s11999-009-1021-5

17.

Cicchetti

, Sparrow

. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic (1981); 86 (2): 127–137

18.

Shrout

, Fleiss

. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull (1979); 86 (2): 420–428

10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

19.

Ganz

, Parvizi

, Beck

, Leunig

, Notzli

, Siebenrock

. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2003); 417: 112–120

20.

Houcke

, Yau

, Yan

. Prevalence of radiographic parameters predisposing to femoroacetabular impingement in young asymptomatic Chinese and white subjects. J Bone Jt Surg Am (2015); 97 (4): 310–317

10.2106/JBJS.M.01538

21.

Schmitz

, Bittersohl

, Zaps

, Bomar

, Pennock

, Hosalkar

. Spectrum of radiographic femoroacetabular impingement morphology in adolescents and young adults: an EOS-based double-cohort study. J Bone Jt Surg Am (2013); 95 (13): e90

10.2106/JBJS.L.01030

22.

Siebenrock

, Kalbermatten

, Ganz

. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2003); 407: 241–248

10.1097/00003086-200302000-00033

23.

Clohisy

, Carlisle

, Beaule

. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Jt Surg Am (2008); 90 (Suppl 4): 47–66

10.2106/JBJS.H.00756

24.

Fabricant

, Hirsch

, Holmes

. A radiographic study of the ossification of the posterior wall of the acetabulum: implications for the diagnosis of pediatric and adolescent hip disorders. J Bone Jt Surg Am (2013); 95 (3): 230–236

10.2106/JBJS.L.00592

25.

Acheson

. The Oxford method of assessing skeletal maturity. Clin Orthop (1957); 10: 19–39

26.

Morris

, Chen

, Cooperman

, Liu

. Characterization of ossification of the posterior rim of acetabulum in the developing hip and its impact on the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Jt Surg Am (2015); 97 (3): e11

10.2106/JBJS.N.00553

27.

Liu

, Armstrong

, Levine

, Gilmore

, Thompson

, Cooperman

. An anatomic study of the epiphyseal tubercle and its importance in the pathogenesis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Jt Surg Am (2013); 95 (6): e341–e348

10.2106/JBJS.L.00474

28.

Liu

, Armstrong

, Levine

, Gilmore

, Thompson

, Cooperman

. An anatomic study of the distal femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop (2013); 33 (7): 743–749

10.1097/BPO.0b013e31829d55bf

29.

Morris WZ, Weinberg DS, Gebhart JJ, Cooperman DR, Liu RW (2016) Capital femoral growth plate extension predicts cam deformity in a longitudinal radiographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. (Fully accepted and in press)