Traumatic tendon lacerations are a common problem encountered by hand surgeons worldwide. Although the use of barbed suture to repair tendon lacerations has gained theoretical popularity in recent years, there is little information available regarding the safety, efficacy, longevity, or complications encountered when used in tenorraphy. In this study, we review the available literature on the use of barbed suture in tendon repair.
Methods
Studies conducted between 1980 and 2014 were identified using several databases, including EMBASE, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. Keywords used to search for appropriate studies included the following: barbed, v loc, quill, tendon, tendon injuries, suture, tenorraphy, injury, and laceration, in various combinations.
Results
Our initial literature search identified 47 articles, and 8 were deemed appropriate for review after applying our exclusion criteria. The data from each of the articles is reviewed for the following major categories:
Maximum load to failure
Mode of failure
Load to 2-mm gap
Change in cross-sectional area
Type of repair
Conclusions
Barbed suture tenorraphy has a myriad of theoretical advantages, supported by varying ex vivo studies, as compared to traditional techniques. However, due to the non-uniformity in current studies and the lack of available data in a live model, we are unable to argue for or against barbed suture tenorraphy. We believe our review provides the most in-depth analysis of barbed suture tenorraphy to date, illuminates the potential advantages of using barbed sutures, and highlights the need for further investigation into this technique.
AnsariULawsonRDPetersonJLAppleyardRCTonkinMA. Effect of partial versus complete circumferential repair on flexor tendon strength in cadavers. J Hand Surg.2009;34:1771–6.
2.
AokiMManskePRPruittDLLarsonBJ. Work of flexion after tendon repair with various suture methods. A human cadaveric study. J Hand Surg.1995;20:310–3.
3.
BarrieKAWolfeSWSheanCShenbagamurthiDSladeJF3rdPanjabiMM. A biomechanical comparison of multistrand flexor tendon repairs using an in situ testing model. J Hand Surg.2000;25:499–506.
4.
CannonNMStricklandJW. Therapy following flexor tendon surgery. Hand Clin.1985;1:147–65.
5.
CaulfieldRHMaleki-TabriziAPatelHColdhamFMeeSNanchahalJ. Comparison of zones 1 to 4 flexor tendon repairs using absorbable and unabsorbable four-strand core sutures. J Hand Surg Eur Vol.2008;33:412–7.
6.
CoertJHUchiyamaSAmadioPCBerglundLJAnKN. Flexor tendon-pulley interaction after tendon repair. A biomechanical study. J Hand Surg.1995;20:573–7.
7.
CooneyWPWeidmanKMaloDWoodMB. Management of acute flexor tendon injury in the hand. Instr Course Lect.1985;34:373–81.
8.
GussousYMZhaoCAmadioPCAnKN. The resurgence of barbed suture and connecting devices for use in flexor tendon tenorrhaphy. Hand.2011;6:268–75.
9.
HirparaKMSullivanPJO'SullivanME. A new barbed device for repair of flexor tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol.2010;92:1165–70.
10.
IngleNPKingMW. Optimizing the tissue anchoring performance of barbed sutures in skin and tendon tissues. J Biomech.2010;43:302–9.
11.
IngleNPKingMWZikryMA. Finite element analysis of barbed sutures in skin and tendon tissues. J Biomech.2010;43:879–86.
12.
JenningsERMansbergerARJrSmithEPJrYeagerGH. A new technique in primary tendon repair. Surg Gynecol Obstet.1952;95:597–600.
13.
JoyceCWWhatelyKEChanJCMurphyMO'BrienFJCarrollSM. Flexor tendon repair: a comparative study between a knotless barbed suture repair and a traditional four-strand monofilament suture repair. J Hand Surg Eur Vol.2014;39:40–5.
14.
KhannaAGougouliasNMaffulliN. Modalities in prevention of flexor tendon adhesion in the hand: what have we achieved so far?Acta Orthop Belg.2009;75:433–44.
15.
KimPTAokiMTokitaFIshiiS. Tensile strength of cross-stitch epitenon suture. J Hand Surg.1996;21:821–3.
16.
KimJCLeeYKLimBSRheeSHYangHC. Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures. J Mater Sci Mater Med.2007;18:2363–9.
17.
KubotaHAokiMPruittDLManskePR. Mechanical properties of various circumferential tendon suture techniques. J Hand Surg.1996;21:474–80.
18.
LinTELakhianiCLeeMRSaint-CyrMSammerDM. Biomechanical analysis of knotless flexor tendon repair using large-diameter unidirection barbed suture. Hand.2013;8:315–9.
19.
Marin BraunFFoucherGBuch JaegerNSammutD. [Repair of the flexor digitorum profundus and the flexor pollicis longus by the “rope down” technique. Results in a series of 77 cases]. Ann Hand Upper Limb Surg.1991;10:13–21.
20.
Marrero-AmadeoICChauhanAWardenSJMerrellGA. Flexor tendon repair with a knotless barbed suture: a comparative biomechanical study. J Hand Surg.2011;36:1204–8.
21.
McClellanWTSchesslerMJRuchDSLevinLSGoldnerRD. A knotless flexor tendon repair technique using a bidirectional barbed suture: an ex vivo comparison of three methods. Plast Reconstr Surg.2011;128:322e–7e.
22.
McKenzieAR. An experimental multiple barbed suture for the long flexor tendons of the palm and fingers. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol.1967;49:440–7.
23.
MillerBDoddsSDDe MarsAZagoreasNWaitayawinyuTTrumbleTE. Flexor tendon repairs: the impact of fiberwire on grasping and locking core sutures. J Hand Surg.2007;32:591–6.
24.
MomoseTAmadioPCZhaoCZobitzMECouvreurPJAnKN. Suture techniques with high breaking strength and low gliding resistance: experiments in the dog flexor digitorum profundus tendon. Acta Orthop Scand.2001;72:635–41.
25.
MomoseTAmadioPCZhaoCZobitzMEAnKN. The effect of knot location, suture material, and suture size on the gliding resistance of flexor tendons. J Biomed Mater Res.2000;53:806–11.
26.
MoriyaTZhaoCAnKNAmadioPC. The effect of epitendinous suture technique on gliding resistance during cyclic motion after flexor tendon repair: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg.2010;35:552–8.
27.
MurthaAPKaplanALPagliaMJMillsBBFeldsteinMLRuffGL. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture. Plast Reconstr Surg.2006;117:1769–80.
28.
O'BroinESEarleyMJSmythHHooperAC. Absorbable sutures in tendon repair. A comparison of PDS with prolene in rabbit tendon repair. J Hand Surg.1995;20:505–8.
29.
ParikhPMDavisonSPHigginsJP. Barbed suture tenorrhaphy: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg.2009;124:1551–8.
30.
PeltzTSHaddadRScougallPJGianoutsosMPBertolloNWalshWR. Performance of a knotless four-strand flexor tendon repair with a unidirectional barbed suture device: a dynamic ex vivo comparison. The Journal of hand surgery, European volume2014;39:30–9.
31.
PeltzTSScougallPOliverRSGlanoutsosMPBertolloNWalshW. The knotless tendon repair with a resorbable unidirectional barbed suture device: an in vivo comparison in the turkey foot. J Hand Surg.2013;38:e33–4.
32.
PruittDLAokiMManskePR. Effect of suture knot location on tensile strength after flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg.1996;21:969–73.
33.
ThurmanRTTrumbleTEHanelDPTencerAFKiserPK. Two-, four-, and six-strand zone II flexor tendon repairs: an in situ *biomechanical comparison using a cadaver model. J Hand Surg.1998;23:261–5.
34.
TrailIAPowellESNobleJ. An evaluation of suture materials used in tendon surgery. J Hand Surg.1989;14:422–7.
35.
TrocchiaAMAhoHNSobolG. A re-exploration of the use of barbed sutures in flexor tendon repairs. Orthopedics2009;32.
36.
ViinikainenAGoranssonHHuovinenKKellomakiMRokkanenP. A comparative analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of five flexor tendon core sutures. J Hand Surg.2004;29:536–43.
37.
WaitayawinyuTMartineauPALuriaSHanelDPTrumbleTE. Comparative biomechanic study of flexor tendon repair using FiberWire. J Hand Surg.2008;33:701–8.
38.
WintersSCGelbermanRHWooSLChanSSGrewalRSeilerJG3rd. The effects of multiple-strand suture methods on the strength and excursion of repaired intrasynovial flexor tendons: a biomechanical study in dogs. J Hand Surg.1998;23:97–104.
39.
ZeplinPHZahnRKMeffertRHSchmidtK. Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon repair using barbed suture material: a comparative ex vivo study. J Hand Surg.2011;36:446–9.
