Radiostereometric Analysis: The Hip

Davidson M (1898) Roentgen rays and localization. An apparatus for exact measurement and localization by means of roentgen rays. Brit Med J 10

Selvik G Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system Acta Orthop Scand 1989232 Suppl 1–51

Ryd L Yuan X Lofgren H Methods for determining the accuracy of radiostereometric analysis Acta Orthop Scand 200071 403–40810.1080/000164700317393420

Sutherland CJ Wilde AH Borden LS Marks KE A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Müller curved-stem total hip replacement arthroplasties J Bone Jt Surg 198264-A 970–982

Malchau H Kärrholm J Wang YX Herberts P Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty: digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients Acta Orthop Scand 199566 418–424

Biedermann R Krismer M Stöckl B Mayrhofer P Ornstein E Franzen H Accuracy of EBRA-FCA in the measurement of migration of femoral components of total hip replacement J Bone Jt Surg 199981-B 266–27210.1302/0301-620X.81B2.8842

Soballe K Toksvig-Larsen S Gelineck J Fruensgaard S Hansen ES Ryd L Lucht U Bünger C Migration of hydroxyapatite coated femoral prostheses. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study J Bone Jt Surg 199375-B 681–687

Önsten I Berzins A Shott S Sumner DR Accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in the measurement of THR femoral component translations: human and canine in vitro models J Orthop Res 200119 1162–116710.1016/S0736-0266(01)00039-0

Mjoberg B Loosening of the cemented hip prosthesis. Theimportance of head injury Acta Orthop Scand 1986221 Suppl 1–40

Ryd L Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of prosthetic fixation in the hip and knee joint Clin Ortop 1992276 56–65

Kärrholm J Borssen B Lowenhielm G Snorrason F Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter: 4–7 year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses J Bone Jt Surg 199476-B 912–917

Huiskes R Verdonschot N Nivbrant B Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty Clin Ortop 1998355 103–11210.1097/00003086-199810000-00011

Dall DM Learmonth ID Solomon MI Miles AW Davenport JM Fracture and loosening of charnley femoral stems J Bone Jt Surg 199375-B 259–265

Rockborn P Olsson SS Loosening and bone resorption in Exeter hip arthroplasties. Review at a minimum of five years J Bone Jt Surg 199375-B 865–868

Stefansdottir A Franzen H Johnsson R Ornstein E Sundberg M Movement pattern of the Exeter femoral stem. A radiostereometric analysis of 22 primary hip arthroplasties followed for 5 years Acta Orthop Scand 200475 408–41410.1080/00016470410001169

Kärrholm J Malchau H Snorrason F Herberts P Micromotion of femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty J Bone Jt Surg 199476-A 1692–1705

Hamadouche M Witvoet J Porcher R Meunier A Sedel L Nizard R Hydroxyapatite-coated versus grit-blasted femoral stems. A prospective randomized study using EBRA-FCA J Bone Jt Surg 200183-B 979–98710.1302/0301-620X.83B7.11478

Garcia-Cimbrelo E Cruz-Pardos A Madero R Ortega-Andreu M Total hip arthroplasty with use of the cementless Zweymüller Alloclassic system. A ten to thirteen year follow-up study J Bone Jt Surg 200385-A 296–303

Grübl A Chiari C Gruber M Kaider A Gottsauner-Wolf F Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a tapered, rectangular titanium stem and a threaded cup. A minimum ten-year follow-up J Bone Jt Surg 200284-A 425–431

Healy WL Casey DJ Iorio R Appleby D Evaluation of the porous-coated anatomic hip at 12 years J Arthroplast 200217 856–86310.1054/arth.2002.34822

Kawamura H Dunbar MJ Murray P Bourne RB Rorabeck CH The porous coated anatomic total hip replacment. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study of a cementless total hip arthroplasty J Bone Jt Surg 200183-A 1333–1338

Keisu KS Orozco F Sharkey PF Hozack WJ Rothman RH McGurgan FX Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty in octogenarians. Two to eleven-year follow-up J Bone Jt Surg 200183-A 359–363

Kim YH Bilateral cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty J Arthroplast 200217 434–44010.1054/arth.2002.31073

Nercessian OA Wu WH Sarkissian H Clinical and radiographic results of cementless AML total hip arthroplasty in young patients J Arthroplast 200116 312–31610.1054/arth.2001.21503

Tanzer M Chan S Brooks CE Bobyn JD Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral component. A minimum 6-year follow-up J Arthroplast 200116 64–7010.1054/arth.2001.29140

Kim YH Oh SH Kim JS Primary total hip arthroplasty with a second generation cementless total hip prosthesis in patients younger than fifty years of age J Bone Jt Surg 200385-A 109–114

Keisu KS Orozco F McCallum JD Bissett G Hozack WJ Sharkey PF Rothman RH Cementless femoral fixation in the rheumatoid patient undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Minimum 5-year results J Arthroplast 200116 415–42110.1054/arth.2001.23506

Bottner F, Zawadsky M, Su E, Bostrom M, Palm L, Ryd L, Sculco TP (2005) The impact of the weight bearing protocol on implant migration after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A radistereometric analysis. Clin Ortop (accepted for publication)

Rorabeck CH Bourne RB Mulliken BD Nayak N Laupacis A Tugwell P Feeney D The Nicolas Andry Award. Comparative results of cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty Clin Ortop 1996325 330–34410.1097/00003086-199604000-00044

Thanner J The acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation of different fixation principles Acta Orthop Scand 1999286 Suppl 1–41

Hacking SA Bobyn JD Tanzer M Krygier JJ The osseous response to corundum blasted implant surfaces in canine total hip arthroplasty model Clin Ortop 1999364 240–25310.1097/00003086-199907000-00031

Zhang Y Ahn PB Fitzpatrick DC Heiner AD Poggie RA Brown TD Interfacial frictional behavior: cancellous bone, cortical bone, and a novel porous tantalum biomaterial J Musculoskelet Res 19993 245–25110.1142/S0218957799000269

Bobyn JD Stackpool GJ Hacking SA Tanzer M Krygier JJ Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial J Bone Jt Surg 199981-B 907–91410.1302/0301-620X.81B5.9283

Amstutz HC Innovations in design and technology: the story of hip arthroplasty Clin Ortop 2000378 23–3010.1097/00003086-200009000-00005

Amstutz HC Dorey F O'Carroll PF THARIS resurfacing arthroplasty. Evolution and long-term results Clin Ortop 1986213 92–114

Ritter MA Gioe TJ Conventional versus resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. A long-term prospective study of concomitant bilateral implantation of prostheses J Bone Jt Surg 198668-A 216–225

Tracy RB McBryde CW Pynsent PB Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years J Bone Jt Surg 200587-B 167–17010.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15030

Glyn-Jones S Gill HS McLardy-Smith Murray DW Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A two year study J Bone Jt Surg 200486-B 172–17610.1302/0301-620X.86B2.14371

Itayem R Arndt A Nistor L McMinn D Lundberg A Stability of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty at two years J Bone Jt Surg 200587-B 158–16210.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15394