Five case studies have been conducted: four in Canada and one in Germany. The authors of this article were particularly interested in understanding the value of values and meaning in the context of project management implementation and project environments. The article first summarizes the authors’ particular approach. It then discusses the five case studies and their findings. These findings will be grouped around the concepts of value of project management and meaningful work. In conclusion, the findings of this study will be summarized across all five case studies and based on a comparative content analysis.
ChristensonD., & WalkerD. H. T. (2004). Understanding the role of “vision” for project success. Project Management Journal, 35(3), 39–52.
4.
CoveyS. R. (1989). The seven habits of highly effective people: Restoring the character ethic.New York: Simon and Schuster.
5.
FranklV. E. (1946–1991). Ärztliche Seelsorge. Grundlagen der Logotherapie und Existenzanalyse (3., neu bearb. u. erg. Aufl. ed.). Wien: Franz Deuticke.
6.
FranklV. E. (1988). The will to meaning: Foundations and applications of logotherapy(Expanded edited ed.). New York: Meridian, Penguin Group.
7.
FranklV. E. (1997). Man's search for ultimate meaning.New York: Insight Books.
8.
KeeganA. E., & Den HartogD. N. (2004). Transformational leadership in a project-based environment: A comparative study of the leadership styles of project managers and line managers. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 609–617.
9.
KendraK., & TaplinL. J. (2004). Project success: A cultural framework. Project Management Journal, 35(1), 30–45.
10.
KrippendorfK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
MartinM. W. (2000). Meaningful work: Rethinking professional ethics.New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
MengelT. (2004). From responsibility to values-oriented leadership—6 theses on meaning and values in personal life and work environments. International Network on Personal Meaning. Positive Living E-Zine. Retrieved August 11, 2004, from http://www.meaning.ca/articles04/mengel-responsibility.htm
MengelT. (2008). Motivation. In GoslingJ. & MarturanoA. (Eds.), Key concepts in leadership studies (pp. 111–114). Milton Park, Oxfordshire: Routledge, UK.
15.
MengelT., & ThomasJ. (2004, October). From know-how to know-why—A three dimensional model of project management knowledge. Paper presented at the PMI Global Proceedings, Anaheim, CA.
16.
NorrieJ., & WalkerD. H. T. (2004). A balanced scorecard approach to project management leadership. Project Management Journal, 35(4), 47–56.
17.
PaineL. S. (2003). Value shift: Why companies must merge social and financial imperatives to achieve superior performance.New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
PattakosA. (2004). Prisoners of our thoughts: Viktor Frankl's principles at work.San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
19.
Project Management Institute. (2004). A guide to the project management body of knowledge—Third edition. Newtown Square, PA: Author
20.
SmithA. E. (2007). Leximancer (Version 2.25) [Computer software]. St. Lucia, Brisbane, Australia: Leximancer Pty Ltd. (http://www.leximancer.com).
21.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
StraussA. L., & CorbinJ. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
TerezT. (2000). 22 keys to creating a meaningful workplace.Holbrook, MA: Adams Media.
24.
ThamhainH. J. (2004). Team leadership effectiveness in technology-based project environments. Project Management Journal, 35(4), 35–46.
25.
ThomasJ., & MengelT. (2007, September). Teaching that takes complexity seriously: Developing the master project manager. Presented at the Excellence in Teaching Project Management Conference, University of Bournemouth, UK.
26.
WeberR. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
