The purpose of this study is to shed light on how project management office (PMO) leaders facilitate cross-project learning and continuous improvement. Twenty leaders of PMOs were interviewed; findings were validated by two focus groups. The research reveals that PMO leaders facilitate cross-project improvement by embedding accumulated knowledge from pas project experiences into project management routines that are utilized across multiple projects. The research also points to the phenome non of “red light learning,” where lesson learned sessions can be enculturated as punitive, undermining individual and organizational learning. Recommendations focus on enhancing the social capital of the PMO leader and improving the quality and quantity of reflective practice over the course of the project life cycle
AntoniM., Nilsson-WitellL., & DahlgaardJ. J. (2005). Inter-project improvement in product development. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22, 876–893.
2.
ArgyrisC. (1995). Action science and organizational learning. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(6), 20–26.
AubryM., HobbsB., & ThuillierD. (2008). Organisational project management: An historical approach to the study of PMOs. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 38–43.
5.
BeckerM. C. (2005). A framework for applying organizational routines in empirical research: Linking antecedents, characteristics and performance outcomes of recurrent interaction patterns. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 817–846.
6.
BeckerM. C., LazaricN., NelsonR. R., & WinterS. G. (2005). Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 775–791.
7.
BresnenM., EdelmanL., NewellS., ScarbroughH., & SwanJ. (2003). Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments [Study]. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 157–166.
8.
BresnenM., GoussevskaiaA., & SwanJ. (2005). Organizational routines, situated learning and processes of change in project-based organizations. Project Management Journal, 36(3), 27–41.
9.
CerveroR. & WilsonA. (2001). Power in practice: Adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
DaiC. X. (2002). The role of the project management office in achieving project success. Unpublished 3034791, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
11.
DaiC. X., & WellsW. G. (2004). An exploration of project management office features and their relationship to project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 523–532.
12.
DeFillippiR. J. (2001). Introduction: Project-based learning, reflective practices and learning outcomes. Management Learning, 32(1), 5–10.
13.
DistererG. (2002). Management of project knowledge and experiences. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6, 512–520.
14.
EngleP. (2005). The project management office. Industrial Engineer, 37(1), 20.
15.
FeldmanM. S., & PentlandB. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.
16.
HobbsB., & AubryM. (2007). A multi-phase research program investigating project management offices (PMOs): The results of phase 1. Project Management Journal, 38(1), 74–86.
17.
KeeganA., & TurnerJ. R. (2001). Quantity versus quality in project-based learning practices. Management Learning, 32(1), 77–98.
18.
KerznerH. (2004). Advanced project management: Best practices on implementation (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
19.
KerznerH. (2006). Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
20.
KotnourT. (2000). Organizational learning practices in the project management environment. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17, 393–406.
21.
KotnourT., & VergopiaC. (2005). Learning-based project reviews: Observations and lessons learned from the Kennedy Space Center. Engineering Management Journal, 17(4), 30–38.
22.
MarsickV. (2000). Learning organizations. In BittermanV Marsick J. & Van der VeenR. (Eds.), From the learning organization to learning communities toward a learning society (pp. 7–19). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education.
ScarbroughH., BresnenM., EdelmanL. F., & LaurentS. (2004). The processes of project-based learning: An exploratory study. Management Learning, 35, 491–506.
34.
ScarbroughH., SwanJ., LaurentS., & BresnenM. (2004). Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries. Organization Studies, 25, 1579–1600.
35.
SchindlerM., & EpplerM. J. (2003). Harvesting project knowledge: A review of project learning methods and success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 219–228.
36.
SenseA. J. (2003). Learning generators: Project teams re-conceptualized. Project Management Journal, 34(3), 4–12.
SzulanskiG., & JensenR. J. (2004). Overcoming stickiness: An empirical investigation of the role of the template in the replication of organizational routines. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25, 347–363.
39.
VeraD., CrossanM. (2003). Organizational learning and knowledge management: Toward an integrative framework. In LylesM. A. & Easterby-SmithM. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 122–142). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
40.
von ZedtwitzM. (2002). Organizational learning through postproject reviews in R&D. R&D Management, 32, 255–268.
41.
von ZedtwitzM. (2003). Post-project reviews in R&D. Research Technology Management, 46(5), 43–49.
42.
WalkerD. H. T., & ChristensonD. (2005). Knowledge wisdom and networks: A project management centre of excellence example. The Learning Organization, 12(3), 275–291.
43.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
WengerE., McDermottR. A., & SnyderW. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice a guide to managing knowledge.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
45.
ZolloM., & WinterS. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13, 339–351.
