Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Self‐reports of behaviour have been criticized as fraught with problems that seriously undermine the construct validity of conventional personality measures. The problems are related to a putative absence of, or distortion of, a person's knowledge about himself or herself. A proposed solution is to use peer reports of personality instead, because such observer ratings are presumably more impartial and free of the distorting influences affecting self‐reports. We review some past research on moderators of the agreement between self‐reports and peer ratings of personality, arguing that those findings support the validity of self‐ratings. We conclude that peer ratings, although highly useful as adjuncts to other methods of assessment, are no substitute for self‐reports as a source of personality information. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

personality scales and inventories peer ratings person perception construct validity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett

(2009).What you don't know about your friends. Boston Globe, pp.C1–C2.

Blackman

M. C.

Funder

D. C.

(1998).The effect of information on consensus and accuracy in personality judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34,164–181.

Brunswik

(1955).Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62,193–217.

Campbell

J. D.

Fehr

(1990).Self‐esteem and perceptions of conveyed impressions: Is negative affectivity associated with greater realism? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58,122–133.

Cheek

(1982).Aggregation, moderator variables, and the validity of personality tests: A peer‐rating study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43,1254–1269.

Colvin

C. R.

Funder

D. C.

(1991).Predicting personality and behavior: A boundary on the acquaintanceship effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60,884–894.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

(1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO‐PI‐R) and NEO five‐factor inventory (NEO‐FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Critcher

C. R.

Dunning

(2009).Egocentric pattern projection: How implicit personality theories recapitulate the geography of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97,1–16.

Edwards

A. L.

(1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden.

10.

Edwards

A. L.

(1970). The measurement of personality traits by scales and inventories. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

11.

Funder

D. C.

(1980).On seeing ourselves as others see us: Self‐other agreement and discrepancy in personality ratings. Journal of Personality, 48,473–493.

12.

Funder

D. C.

(1989). Accuracy in personality judgment and the dancing bear. In D. M. Buss , & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions(pp.210–223). New York: Springer‐Verlag.

13.

Funder

D. C.

Colvin

C. R.

(1988).Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55,149–158.

14.

Funder

D. C.

Dobroth

K. M.

(1987).Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52,409–418.

15.

Funder

D. C.

Kolar

D. C.

Blackman

M. C.

(1995).Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,656–672.

16.

Gill

M. J.

Swann

W. B.

(2004).On what it means to know someone: A matter of pragmatics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86,405–418.

17.

Gosling

S. D.

John

O. P.

Craik

K. H.

Robins

R. W.

(1998).Do people know how they behave? Self‐reported act frequencies compared with on‐line codings by observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74,1337–1349.

18.

Gosling

S. D.

S. J.

Mannarelli

Morris

M. E.

(2002).A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82,379–398.

19.

Hammond

K. R.

Hursch

C. J.

Todd

F. J.

(1964).Analyzing the components of clinical inference. Psychological Review, 71,215–224.

20.

Hayes

A. F.

Dunning

(1997).Construal processes and trait ambiguity: Implications for self‐peer agreement in personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72,664–677.

21.

Hofstee

W. K. B.

(1994).Who should own the definition of personality? European Journal of Personality, 8,149–162.

22.

Jackson

D. N.

(1971).The dynamics of structured personality tests:1971. Psychological Review, 78,229–248.

23.

Jackson

D. N.

(1984). Personality research form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.

24.

Jackson

D. N.

Paunonen

S. V.

(1980).Personality structure and assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 31,503–551.

25.

John

O. P.

Robins

R. W.

(1993).Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61,521–551.

26.

John

O. P.

Robins

R. W.

(1994).Accuracy and bias in self‐perception: Individual differences in self‐enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,206–219.

27.

Kenny

D. A.

(1993).A coming‐of‐age for research on interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality, 61,789–807.

28.

Kenrick

D. T.

Stringfield

D. O.

(1980).Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people. Psychological Review, 87,88–104.

29.

Kolar

D. W.

Funder

D. C.

Colvin

C. R.

(1996).Comparing the accuracy of personality judgments by the self and knowledgeable others. Journal of Personality, 64,311–337.

30.

Kurtz

J. E.

Sherker

J. L.

(2003).Relationship quality, trait similarity, and self‐other agreement on personality ratings in college roommates. Journal of Personality, 71,21–48.

31.

McCrae

R. R.

Weiss

(2007). Observer ratings of personality. In R. W. Robins , R. C. Fraley , & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in psychology(pp.259–272). New York: The Guilford Press.

32.

McFarland

L. A.

Ryan

A. M.

(2006).Toward an integrated model of applicant faking behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36,979–1016.

33.

Morgeson

F. P.

Campion

M. A.

Dipboye

R. L.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Murphy

Schmitt

(2007).Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60,683–729.

34.

Mount

M. K.

Barrick

M. R.

Strauss

J. P.

(1994).Validity of observer ratings of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79,272–280.

35.

O'Connor

M. C.

Paunonen

S. V.

(2007).Big Five personality predictors of post‐secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43,971–990.

36.

Parkinson

C. N.

(1957). Parkinson's Law and other studies in administration. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin Co.

37.

Paulhus

D. L.

(1984).Two‐component models of social desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46,598–609.

38.

Paulhus

D. L.

(1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson , P. R. Shaver , & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes(pp.17–59). New York: Academic Press.

39.

Paulhus

D. L.

Bruce

M. N.

(1992).The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63,816–824.

40.

Paulhus

D. L.

Bruce

M. N.

Trapnell

P. D.

(1995).Effects of self‐presentation strategies on personality profiles and their structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21,100–108.

41.

Paulhus

D. L.

Vazire

(2007). The self‐report method. In R. W. Robins , R. C. Fraley , & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), The handbook of research methods in personality(pp.224–239). New York: The Guilford Press.

42.

Paunonen

S. V.

(1988).Trait relevance and the differential predictability of behavior. Journal of Personality, 56,599–619.

43.

Paunonen

S. V.

(1989).Consensus in personality judgments: Moderating effects of target‐rater acquaintanceship and behavior observability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56,823–833.

44.

Paunonen

S. V.

(1991).On the accuracy of ratings of personality by strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61,471–477.

45.

Paunonen

S. V.

(2002). Design and construction of the Supernumerary Personality Inventory. (Research Bulletin 763). London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario.

46.

Paunonen

S. V.

(2003).Big Five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84,411–424.

47.

Paunonen

S. V.

Jackson

D. N.

(1985a).The validity of formal and informal personality assessments. Journal of Research in Personality, 19,331–342.

48.

Paunonen

S. V.

Jackson

D. N.

(1985b).On ad hoc personality scales: A reply to Burisch. Journal of Research in Personality, 19,348–353.

49.

Paunonen

S. V.

Jackson

D. N.

(2000).What is beyond the Big Five? Plenty. Journal of Personality, 68,821–835.

50.

Pronin

Kugler

M. B.

(2007).Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of bias blind spot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43,565–578.

51.

Saucier

Goldberg

L. R.

(1998).What is beyond the Big Five? Journal of Personality, 66,495–524.

52.

Spain

J. S.

Eaton

L. G.

Funder

D. C.

(2000).Perspectives on personality: The relative accuracy of self versus others for the prediction of emotion and behavior. Journal of Personality, 68,837–867.

53.

Swann

W. B.

Gill

M. J.

(1997).Confidence and accuracy in person perception: Do we know what we think we know about our relationship partners? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73,747–757.

54.

Vazire

(2006).Informant reports: A cheap, fast, and easy method for personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 40,472–481.

55.

Vazire

Mehl

M. R.

(2008).Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self‐ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95,1202–1216.

56.

Wagerman

S. A.

Funder

D. C.

(2007).Acquaintance reports of personality and academic achievement: A case for conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 41,221–229.

57.

Watson

Clark

L. A.

(1991).Self‐ versus peer ratings of specific emotional traits: Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60,927–940.

58.

Zuckerman

Koestner

DeBoy

Garcia

Maresca

B. C.

Sartoris

J. M.

(1988).To predict some of the people some of the time: A reexamination of the moderator variable approach in personality theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54,1006–1019.

Self‐reports,peer ratings and construct validity

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References