Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The ‘erratum and addendum’ by Anderson and Ones (2008) does not state unambiguously that participants' Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI) scale scores were incorrectly matched with their scores on the other inventories' scales, nor does it mention the existence of other errors in the scoring of the Occupational Personality Questionnaire (OPQ) and Business Personality Indicator (BPI) scales. We demonstrate these errors and we recommend the retraction of the articles by Anderson and Ones (2003) and Ones and Anderson (2002). Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

personality scales and inventories

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Ones

D. S.

(2003).The construct validity of three entry level personality inventories used in the UK: Cautionary findings from a multiple‐inventory investigation. European Journal of Personality, 17,s39–s66.

Anderson

Ones

D. S.

(2008).The construct validity of three entry level personality inventories used in the UK: A cautionary case study: Erratum and addendum. European Journal of Personality. (this issue). DOI:10.1002/per.651

Feltham

Woods

(2003). PeopleMapper: The workplace personality questionnaire. London: ASE.

Ones

D. S.

Anderson

(2002).Gender and ethnic group differences on personality scales in selection: Some British data. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75,255–276.

Comment on Anderson and Ones (2008)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References