Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In the current study, we looked for the relations between broad personality dimensions (metatraits of personality and higher–order values) and everyday behaviours. We asked participants (N = 374; aged 17 to 53, M_age = 23.72) about their current behaviour, followed by questions on situational context (company and perceived autonomy) seven times per day for seven consecutive days, using an experience sampling mobile app. This method allowed us to capture a wide range of descriptions of behavioural acts (n = 13 873), which were then empirically categorized. Personality metatraits distinguished within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits (i.e. Stability vs. Disinhibition, Plasticity vs. Passiveness, Integration vs. Disharmony, and Self–Restraint vs. Sensation–Seeking) and values from the refined model of Schwartz et al. (Openness to Change vs. Conservation and Self–Transcendence vs. Self–Enhancement) were measured by self–descriptive questionnaires. Multilevel logistic regressions with multiple predictors, including traits and values simultaneously, revealed significant effects or tendencies for 20 of the 35 categories of activities, five kinds of company, and perceived autonomy. The best predictors of activities and situational context were the higher–order values Openness to Change vs. Conservation. © 2020 European Association of Personality Psychology

Keywords

everyday behaviours personality metatraits higher-order values autonomy company

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abele

A. E.

, & Wojciszke

(2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978–0–12–800284–1.00004–7.

Alessandri

, & Vecchione

(2012). The higher–order factors of the Big Five as predictors of job performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 779–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.037.

Allport

G. W.

(1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York, NY: Holt.

Bakir

, & Kangalgil

(2017). The effect of sport on the level of positivity and well–being in adolescents engaged in sport regularly. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i11.2592.

Bates

, Maechler

, Bolker

, & Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed–effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

Baumeister

R. F.

, Vohs

K. D.

, & Funder

D. C.

(2007). Psychology as the science of self–reports and finger movements. Whatever happened to actual behavior. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745–6916.2007.00051.

Becker

(1999). Beyond the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00168-8

Bleidorn

, Hopwood

C. J.

, & Lucas

R. E.

(2018). Life events and personality trait change. Journal of Personality, 86, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12286.

Boyd

R. L.

, Wilson

S. R.

, Pennebaker

J. W.

, Kosinski

, Stillwell

D. J.

, & Mihalcea

(2015). Values in words: Using language to evaluate and understand personal values. In Proceedings of the Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (pp. 31–40). Palo Alto: The AAAI Press.

10.

Brosch

, & Sander

(Eds.). (2016). Handbook of value: Perspectives from economics, neuroscience, philosophy, psychology, and sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

11.

Bujang

M. A.

, & Baharum

(2017). Guidelines of the minimum sample size requirements for Cohen's kappa. Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Health, 14, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2427/12267.

12.

Buss

D. M.

(1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214–1221. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022–3514.53.6.1214.

13.

Buss

D. M.

, & Craik

K. H.

(1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126.

14.

Ching

C. M.

, Church

A. T.

, Katigbak

M. S.

, Reyes

J. A. S.

, Tanaka–Matsumi

, Takaoka

, … Ortiz

F. A.

(2014). The manifestation of traits in everyday behavior and affect: A five–culture study. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.10.002.

15.

Cieciuch

(2017). Exploring the complicated relationship between values and behaviour. In Roccas

, & Sagiv

(Eds.), Values and behavior (pp. 237–247). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–319–56352–7.

16.

Cieciuch

, Davidov

, Vecchione

, Beierlein

, & Schwartz

S. H.

(2014). The cross–national invariance properties of a new scale to measure 19 basic human values. A test across eight countries. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 45, 764–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114527348.

17.

Cieciuch

, & Strus

(2017). Two–Factor Model of personality. In Zeigler

, & Shackelford

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1–17). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–319–28099–8_2129–1.

18.

Converse

B. A.

, Juarez

, & Hennecke

(2019). Self–control and the reasons behind our goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 860–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000188.

19.

Csikszentmihalyi

, & Larson

(1984). Being adolescent: Conflict and growth in the teenage years. New York, NY: Basic Books.

20.

Daniel

, Bilgin

A. S.

, Brezina

, Strohmeier

C. E.

, & Vainre

(2015). Values and helping behavior: A study in four cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 50, 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12086.

21.

Deci

E. L.

, & Ryan

R. M.

(2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self–determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.

22.

DeYoung

C. G.

(2006). Higher–order factors of the Big Five in a multi–informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.91.6.1138.

23.

DeYoung

C. G.

(2010). Personality neuroscience and the biology of traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751–9004.2010.00327.x.

24.

DeYoung

C. G.

(2015). Cybernetic Big Five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004.

25.

DeYoung

C. G.

, & Gray

J. R.

(2009). Personality neuroscience: Explaining individual differences in affect, behavior, and cognition. In Corr

P. J.

, & Matthews

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 323–346). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

26.

DeYoung

C. G.

, Peterson

J. B.

, & Higgins

D. M.

(2002). Higher–order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191–8869(01)00171–4.

27.

DeYoung

C. G.

, Peterson

J. B.

, Séguin

J. R.

, & Tremblay

R. E.

(2008). Externalizing behavior and the higher order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 947–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013742.

28.

Digman

J. M.

(1997). Higher–order factor of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022–3514.73.6.1246.

29.

Dobewall

, & Aavik

(2016). Rank–order consistency and profile stability of self–and informant–reports of personal values in comparison to personality traits. Journal of Individual Differences, 37, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614–0001/a000186.

30.

Dreier

(2011). Personality and the conduct of everyday life. Nordic Psychology, 63, 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901–2276/a000030.

31.

Emmons

R. A.

, & Diener

(1986). Situational selection as a moderator of response consistency and stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1013–1019.

32.

Esses

, & Maio

(2005). Expanding the assessment of attitude components and structure: The benefits of open–ended measures. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 71–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013478.ch3.

33.

Fischer

(2017). From values to behavior and from behavior to values. In Roccas

, & Sagiv

(Eds.), Values and behavior. Taking a cross–cultural perspective (pp. 219–235). Berlin: Springer.

34.

Fleeson

, & Jayawickreme

(2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009.

35.

Funder

D. C.

(2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Person, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.003.

36.

Funder

D. C.

(2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.041.

37.

Furr

R. M.

, & Funder

D. C.

(in press). Person, situation, and person–situation interactions. In John

O. P.

, & Robins

R. W.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.

38.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big–Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022–3514.59.6.1216.

39.

Goldberg

L. R.

(2010). Personality, demographics, and self–reported behavioral acts: The development of Avocational Interest Scales from estimates of the amount of time spent in interest–related activities. In Agnew

C. R.

, Carlston

D. E.

, Graziano

W. G.

, & Kelly

J. R.

(Eds.), Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research (pp. 205–226). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

40.

Grankvist

, & Kajonius

(2015). Personality traits and values: A replication with a Swedish sample. International Journal of Personality Psychology, 1, 8–14.

41.

Gray

J. A.

(1991). The neuropsychology of temperament. In Strelau

, & Angleitner

(Eds.), Exploration in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement (pp. 102–128). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

42.

Gray

J. A.

(1994). Personality dimensions and emotion systems. In Ekman

, & Davidson

R. J.

(Eds.), The nature of emotion (pp. 329–331). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

43.

Haeffel

G. J.

(2017). Don't sleep on it: Less sleep reduces risk for depressive symptoms in cognitively vulnerable undergraduates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000119.

44.

Hampson

S. E.

, & Edmonds

G. W.

(2018). A new twist on old questions: A life span approach to the trait concept. Journal of Personality, 86, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12304.

45.

Hirsh

J. B.

, DeYoung

C. G.

, & Peterson

J. B.

(2009). Metatraits of the Big Five differentially predict engagement and restraint of behavior. Journal of Personality, 77, 1085–1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2009.00575.x.

46.

Hsieh

H.–F.

, & Shannon

S. E.

(2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.

47.

Hughes

(2017). Package ‘paramtest’: Run a function iteratively while varying parameters. Retrieved from https://cran.r–project.org/web/packages/paramtest/paramtest.pdf

48.

Kreitler

(2018). Personality traits as patterns of meaning assignment tendencies. Journal of Personality, 86, 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12315.

49.

La Guardia

J. G.

, & Ryan

R. M.

(2007). Why identities fluctuate: Variability in traits as a function of situational variations in autonomy support. Journal of Personality, 75, 1205–1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2007.00473.x.

50.

Larson

R. W.

, Richards

M. H.

, Sims

, & Dworkin

(2001). How urban African American young adolescents spend their time: Time budgets for locations, activities, and companionship. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 565–597. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010422017731.

51.

LeBeau

(2019). Package ‘simglm’: Simulate models based on the generalized linear model. Retrieved from https://cran.r–project.org/web/packages/simglm/simglm.pdf

52.

Liu

, & Campbell

W. K.

(2017). The Big Five personality traits, Big Two metatraits and social media: A meta–analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.08.004.

53.

McAdams

D. P.

(1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63, 365–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.1995.tb00500.x.

54.

McCrae

R. R.

, & Costa

P. T.

Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A Five–Factor Theory perspective. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

55.

McCrae

R. R.

, & Costa

P. T.

Jr. (2008). The Five–Factor Theory of personality. In John

O. P.

, Robins

R. W.

, & Pervin

L. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 159–181). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

56.

McCrae

R. R.

, Costa

P. T.

Jr. , Ostendorf

, Angleitner

, Hrebickova

, Avia

M. D.

, … Smith

P. B.

(2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.78.1.173.

57.

McDonald

R. P.

(1978). Generalizability in factorable domains: “Domain validity and generalizability”: 1. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 75–79.

58.

McDonald

R. P.

(1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

59.

McFarland

, & Ryan

(2006). Toward an integrated model of applicant faking behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 979–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021–9029.2006.00052.x.

60.

McHugh

M. L.

(2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22, 276–282.

61.

Mehl

M. R.

, Gosling

S. D.

, & Pennebaker

J. W.

(2006). Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 862–877. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.90.5.862.

62.

Mehl

M. R.

, Pennebaker

J. W.

, Crow

D. M.

, Dabbs

, & Price

J. H.

(2001). The electronically activated recorder (EAR): A device for sampling naturalistic daily activities and conversations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33, 517–523.

63.

Miner

, & Dowson

(2008). Does religion compromise autonomy? In Johnston

, & McPhillips

(Eds.), Essays from the AASR conference (pp. 55–70). New Zealand: University of Auckland.

64.

Mõttus

, & Allerhand

M. H.

(2018). Why do traits come together? The underlying trait and network approaches. In Zeigler–Hill

, & Shackelford

T. K.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: Vol. 1. The science of personality and individual differences (pp. 130–151). London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451163.n6.

65.

Mueller

, Ram

, Conroy

D. E.

, Pincus

A. L.

, Gerstorf

, & Wagner

(2019). Happy like a fish in water? The role of personality–situation fit for momentary happiness in social interactions across the adult lifespan. European Journal of Personality, 33, 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2198.

66.

Musek

(2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the Five–Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003.

67.

Musek

(2017). The general factor of personality: Ten years after. Psychological Topics, 26, 61–87.

68.

Nakagawa

, & Schielzeth

(2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R² from generalized linear mixed–effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041–210x.2012.00261.x.

69.

Olvera Astivia

O. L.

, Gadermann

, & Guhn

(2019). The relationship between statistical power and predictor distribution in multilevel logistic regression: A simulation–based approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874–019–0742–8.

70.

Parks

, & Guay

R. P.

(2009). Personality, values, and motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.002.

71.

Paunonen

S. V.

(2003). Big Five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.84.2.411.

72.

Pozzebon

, & Ashton

(2009). Personality and values as predictors of self– and peer–reported behavior. Journal of Individual Differences, 30, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614–0001.30.3.122.

73.

Prentice

, Halusic

, & Sheldon

(2014). Integrating theories of psychological needs–as–requirements and psychological needs–as–motives: A two process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12088.

74.

Rauthmann

, Sherman

R. A.

, & Funder

D. C.

(2015). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1994.

75.

Revelle

(2017). An introduction to the psych package: Part II scale construction and psychometrics. Evanston: Northwestern University.

76.

Revelle

, & Condon

D. M.

(2018). Reliability. In Irwing

, Booth

, & Hughes

D. J.

(Eds.), The Wiley handbook of psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on survey, scale and test development (pp. 709–749). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772

77.

Revelle

, & Zinbarg

R. E.

(2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74, 145–154.

78.

Roccas

, Sagiv

, Schwartz

S. H.

, & Knafo

(2002). The Big Five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008.

79.

Rohrer

J. M.

, & Lucas

R. E.

(2018). Only so many hours: Correlations between personality and daily time use in a representative German panel. Collabra: Psychology, 4, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.112.

80.

Saucier

, Thalmayer

A. G.

, Payne

D. L.

, Carlson

, Sanogo

, Ole–Kotikash

, … Zhou

(2014). A basic bivariate structure of personality attributes evident across nine languages. Journal of Personality, 82, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12028.

81.

Schwartz

S. H.

(2017). The refined theory of basic values. In Roccas

, & Sagiv

(Eds.), Values and behavior: Taking a cross–cultural perspective (pp. 51–72). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

82.

Rushton

J. P.

& Irwing

(2011). The General Factor of Personality: Normal and abnormal. In Chamorro-Premuzic

, von Stumm

& Furnham

(Eds.), The Wiley–Blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 134–163). London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

83.

Schwartz

S. H.

, Cieciuch

, Vecchione

, Davidov

, Fischer

, Beierlein

, … Konty

(2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393.

84.

Schwartz

S. H.

, & Huismans

(1995). Value priorities and religiosity in four Western religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 88–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787148.

85.

Seppälä

, Lipponen

, Bardi

, & Pirtilä–Backman

A.–M.

(2012). Change–oriented organizational citizenship behaviour: An interactive product of openness to change values, work unit identification, and sense of power. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044–8325.2010.02010.x.

86.

Settles

R. E.

, Fischer

, Cyders

M. A.

, Combs

J. L.

, Gunn

R. L.

& Smith

G. T.

(2012). Negative urgency: A personality predictor of externalizing behavior characterized by neuroticism, low conscientiousness, and disagreeableness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024948

87.

Simsek

Ö. F.

(2014). Higher order structure of personality and mental health: Does general affectivity matter?. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.836527

88.

Skimina

, Cieciuch

, Schwartz

S. H.

, Davidov

, & Algesheimer

(2019). Behavioral signatures of values in everyday behaviors in retrospective and real–time self–reports. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00281.

89.

Skimina

, Cieciuch

, & Strus

(2018). Traits and values as predictors of the frequency of everyday behavior: Comparison between models and levels. Current Psychology, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144–018–9892–9.

90.

Skimina

, Karaś

, Topolewska–Siedzik

, Kłym–Guba

, Rogoza

, & Cieciuch

(2017). A categorization system of activities reported in experience sampling studies. Unpublished manuscript.

91.

Strus

, & Cieciuch

(2017). Towards a synthesis of personality, temperament, motivation, emotion and mental health models within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.12.002.

92.

Strus

, & Cieciuch

(2019). Are the questionnaire and the psycho–lexical Big Twos the same? Towards an integration of personality structure within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. International Journal of Personality Psychology, 5, 18–35. https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.5.35594.

93.

Strus

, Cieciuch

, & Rowiński

(2014). The Circumplex of Personality Metatraits: A synthesizing model of personality based on the Big Five. Review of General Psychology, 18, 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000017.

94.

Vecchione

, Alessandri

, Barbaranelli

, & Caprara

(2011). Higher–order factors of the Big Five and basic values: Empirical and theoretical relations. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 478–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044–8295.2010.02006.x.

95.

Vecchione

, Alessandri

, Roccas

, & Caprara

G. V.

(2019). A look into the relationship between personality traits and basic values: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Personality, 87, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12399.

96.

Weinstein

S. M.

, & Mermelstein

(2007). Relations between daily activities and adolescent mood: The role of autonomy. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410701274967.

97.

Wiggins

J. S.

(1995). Interpersonal adjective scales professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

98.

Wilt

, & Revelle

(2017). The Big Five, everyday context and activities, and affective experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.032.

99.

Wrzus

, Wagner

G. G.

, & Riediger

(2016). Personality–situation transactions from adolescence to old age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000054.

100.

Yik

(2009). Studying affect among the Chinese: The circular way. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890903087596.

101.

Yik

(2010). Affect and interpersonal behaviors: Where do the circumplexes meet? Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 721–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.10.003.

102.

Zuckerman

(1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.02 MB

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

1.15 MB

Explaining Everyday Behaviours and Situational Context by Personality Metatraits and Higher–Order Values

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material