Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Mimicking, that is showing the same nonverbal behaviour as one's interaction partner, is related to trait Affiliation, but there are no previous investigations on its relations to broader concepts of personality. In this study, personality was assessed in terms of the Big Five and the two interpersonal dimensions Affiliation and Dominance. Dyads of unacquainted participants completed a task, several of their behaviours being coded every 10 s. Moreover, the interactants were instructed either to cooperate or to compete, and their performance and liking were measured. Using multilevel modelling, mimicry coefficients were estimated (Level 1) and predicted from personality (Level 2) and the situational context (Level 3). In addition, performance and being liked were predicted from mimicry and the context. Mimicry turned out to be widespread, being predicted by personality traits for some behaviours. In turn, mimicry predicted performance and being liked, some of these effects also depending on the context. Copyright © 2015 European Association of Personality Psychology

Keywords

mimicry Big Five interpersonal circumplex nonverbal behaviour dyadic interaction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argyle

, & Cook

(1976). Gaze and mutual gaze. Oxford, England: Cambridge University Press.

Baron

R. M.

, & Kenny

D. A.

(1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Borkenau

, Mauer

, Riemann

, Spinath

F. M.

, & Angleitner

(2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599–614. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599

Borkenau

, & Ostendorf

(1998). The Big Five as states: How useful is the Five–Factor Model to describe intraindividual variations over time? Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 202–221. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1997.2206

Buss

D. M.

, & Craik

K. H.

(1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.90.2.105

Chartrand

T. L.

, & Bargh

J. A.

(1999). The Chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893

Chartrand

T. L.

, & Lakin

J. L.

(2013). The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 285–308. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143754

Chartrand

T. L.

, Maddux

W. W.

, & Lakin

J. L.

(2005). Beyond the perception–behavior link: The ubiquitous utility and motivational moderators of nonconscious mimicry. In Ran

J. S. U.

, Hassin

, & Bargh

John A.

(Ed.), The new unconscious (pp. 334–361). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Cheng

C. M.

, & Chartrand

T. L.

(2003). Self–monitoring without awareness: Using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1170–1179. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1170

10.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

11.

Cook

, Bird

, Lünser

, Huck

, & Heyes

(2012). Automatic imitation in a strategic context: Players of rock–paper–scissors imitate opponents’ gestures. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 780–786. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1024

12.

Costa

P. T.

, & McCrae

R. R.

(1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well–being: happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668–678. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.668

13.

Costa

P. T.

Jr. , & McCrae

R. R.

(2010). The five–factor model, five–factor theory, and interpersonal psychology. In Horowitz

L. M.

& Strack

(Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment and therapeutic interventions (pp. 91–104). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

14.

Côté

, & Moskowitz

D. S.

(1998). On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1032–1046. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.1032

15.

DePaulo

B. M.

, Lindsay

J. J.

, Malone

B. E.

, Muhlenbruck

, Charlton

, & Cooper

(2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74

16.

DeYoung

C. G.

, Weisberg

Y. J.

, Quilty

L. C.

, & Peterson

J. B.

(2013). Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the Interpersonal Circumplex, and trait affiliation. Journal of Personality, 81, 465–475. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12020

17.

Ekman

(1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 169–200. doi: 10.1080/02699939208411068

18.

Estow

, Jamieson

J. P.

, & Yates

J. R.

(2007). Self–monitoring and mimicry of positive and negative social behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 425–433. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.05.003

19.

Friedman

H. S.

, & Miller–Herringer

(1991). Nonverbal display of emotion in public and in private: Self–monitoring, personality, and expressive cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 766–775. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.5.766

20.

Guéguen

, Jacob

, & Martin

(2009). Mimicry in social interaction: Its effect on human judgment and behavior. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 253–259.

21.

Gurtman

M. B.

(1993). Constructing personality tests to meet a structural criterion: Application of the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality, 61, 237–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb01033.x

22.

Hanna

J. E.

, & Brennan

S. E.

(2007). Speakers’ eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face–to–face conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 596–615. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.008

23.

Hayes

A. F.

(2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. doi: 10.1080/03637750903310360

24.

Hess

, & Bourgeois

(2010). You smile–I smile: Emotion expression in social interaction. Biological Psychology, 84, 514–520. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.11.001

25.

Hess

, & Fischer

(2013). Emotional mimicry as social regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 142–157. doi: 10.1177/1088868312472607

26.

Jacobs

, & Scholl

(2005). Interpersonale adjektivliste (IAL). [Interpersonal adjective list (IAL)]. Diagnostica, 51, 145–155. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.51.3.145

27.

Karremans

J. C.

, & Verwijmeren

(2008). Mimicking attractive opposite–sex others: The role of romantic relationship status. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 939–950. doi: 10.1177/0146167208316693

28.

Kavanagh

L. C.

, Suhler

C. L.

, Churchland

P. S.

, & Winkielman

(2011). When it's an error to mirror: The surprising reputational costs of mimicry. Psychological Science, 22, 1274–1276. doi: 10.1177/0956797611418678

29.

Kouzakova

, Karremans

J. C.

, van Baaren

R. B.

, & van Knippenberg

(2010). A stranger's cold shoulder makes the heart grow fonder: Why not being mimicked by a stranger enhances longstanding relationship evaluations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 87–93. doi: 10.1177/1948550609355718

30.

Kulesza

, Dolinski

, Huisman

, & Majewski

(2014). The echo effect: The power of verbal mimicry to influence prosocial behavior. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 183–201. doi: 10.1177/0261927x13506906

31.

Kurzius

(in press). The extraverted chameleon. Personality's effects on mimicry of verbal behavior. Journal of Individual Differences. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000159

32.

Lakin

J. L.

, & Chartrand

T. L.

(2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14, 334–339. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.14481

33.

Lakin

J. L.

, Chartrand

T. L.

, & Arkin

R. M.

(2008). I am too just like you: Nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychological Science, 19, 816–822. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02162.x

34.

Lakin

J. L.

, Jefferis

V. E.

, Cheng

C. M.

, & Chartrand

T. L.

(2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 145–162. doi: 10.1023/a:1025389814290

35.

Lanzetta

J. T.

, & Englis

B. G.

(1989). Expectations of cooperation and competition and their effects on observers’ vicarious emotional responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 543–554. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.543

36.

Larsen

R. J.

, & Ketelaar

(1989). Extraversion, neuroticism and susceptibility to positive and negative mood induction procedures. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1221–1228. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(89)90233-X

37.

Larsen

R. J.

, & Ketelaar

(1991). Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 132–140. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.132

38.

Leary

T. F.

(1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.

39.

Leighton

, Bird

, Orsini

, & Heyes

(2010). Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 905–910. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.001

40.

Maddux

W. W.

, Mullen

, & Galinsky

A. D.

(2008). Chameleons bake bigger pies and take bigger pieces: Strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 461–468.

41.

Madrid

H. P.

, Patterson

M. G.

, Birdi

K. S.

, Leiva

P. I.

, & Kausel

E. E.

(2014). The role of weekly high–activated positive mood, context, and personality in innovative work behavior: A multilevel and interactional model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 234–256. doi: 10.1002/job.1867

42.

McCrae

R. R.

, & Costa

P. T.

Jr. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the Five–Factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586–595. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.586

43.

McCrae

R. R.

, & John

O. P.

(1992). An introduction to the Five–Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x

44.

Moskowitz

D. S.

, & Schwarz

J. C.

(1982). Validity comparison of behavior counts and ratings by knowledgeable informants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 518–528. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.3.518

45.

O'Brien

T. B.

, & DeLongis

(1996). The interactional context of problem–, emotion–, and relationship–focused coping: The role of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Personality, 64, 775–813. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00944.x

46.

Pincus

A. L.

, & Gurtman

M. B.

(1995). The three faces of interpersonal dependency: Structural analyses of self–report dependency measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 744–758. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.744

47.

Raudenbush

S. W.

, Bryk

A. S.

, & Congdon

R. T.

Jr. (2013). HLM for Windows (Version 7.01) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

48.

Shrout

P. E.

, & Fleiss

J. L.

(1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

49.

Snijders

T. A. B.

(2005). Power and sample size in multilevel modeling. In Everitt

B. S.

& Howell

D. C.

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (Vol. 3, pp. 1570–1573). Chicester, UK: Wiley.

50.

Sonnby–Borgström

(2002). Automatic mimicry reactions as related to differences in emotional empathy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 433–443. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00312

51.

Steel

, Schmidt

, & Shultz

(2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well–being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138

52.

Stel

, & Vonk

(2010). Mimicry in social interaction: Benefits for mimickers, mimickees, and their interaction. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 311–323. doi: 10.1348/000712609x465424

53.

Swaab

R. I.

, Maddux

W. W.

, & Sinaceur

(2011). Early words that work: When and how virtual linguistic mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 616–621. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.005

54.

Tan

D. T. Y.

, & Singh

(1995). Attitudes and attraction: A developmental study of the similarity–attraction and dissimilarity–repulsion hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 975–986. doi: 10.1177/0146167295219011

55.

Tschacher

, Ramseyer

, & Bergomi

(2013). The subjective present and its modulation in clinical contexts. Timing and Time Perception, 1, 239–259. doi: 10.1163/22134468-00002013

56.

Valdesolo

, Ouyang

, & DeSteno

(2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 693–695. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.004

57.

van Baaren

R. B.

, Maddux

W. W.

, Chartrand

T. L.

, de Bouter

, & van Knippenberg

(2003). It takes two to mimic: Behavioral consequences of self–construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1093–1102. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1093

58.

Weyers

, Mühlberger

, Kund

, Hess

, & Pauli

(2009). Modulation of facial reactions to avatar emotional faces by nonconscious competition priming. Psychophysiology, 46, 328–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00771.x

59.

Wiggins

J. S.

(1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In Grove

W. M.

& Cicchetti

(Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 89–113). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

60.

Wiggins

J. S.

, & Pincus

A. L.

(1994). Personality structure and the structure of personality disorders. In Costa

P. T.

Jr. & Widiger

T. A.

(Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five–Factor model of personality (pp. 73–93). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Antecedents and Consequences of Mimicry: A Naturalistic Interaction Approach

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material