Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Ecological behaviour is often conceptualized as an instance of cooperating in a social dilemma situation. Thus, it has been argued to relate to dispositional tendencies of moral virtue and pro–social orientation. To embed such notions in models of basic personality, we herein predicted that the recently proposed sixth basic personality factor, Honesty–Humility — which specifically pertains to individual differences in cooperativeness — is linked to environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour. Results from two studies (N = 137 and N = 531, respectively) supported these hypotheses and showed that Honesty–Humility explains incremental variance beyond the remaining, more classical five factors of personality. In addition, mediation analyses revealed that Honesty–Humility exerts part of its influence via individual differences in pro–social value orientations. Individual tendencies to cooperate in social dilemma situations could thus be shown to form a bridge between basic personality dimensions and ecological behaviour. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

Honesty-Humility HEXACO environmental attitudes ecological behaviour social dilemma social value orientation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

(2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.

Ashton

M. C.

& Lee

(2005). Honesty–Humility, the Big Five, and the Five–Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 73, 1321–1353.

Ashton

M. C.

& Lee

(2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.

Ashton

M. C.

& Lee

(2008a). The HEXACO model of personality structure and the importance of the H factor. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1952–1962.

Ashton

M. C.

& Lee

(2008b). The prediction of Honesty–Humility–related criteria by the HEXACO and Five–Factor Models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216–1228.

Ashton

M. C.

Lee

Perugini

Szarota

de Vries

R. E.

Di Blas

… De Raad

(2004). A six–factor structure of personality–descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366.

Axelrod

L. J.

& Lehman

D. R.

(1993). Responding to environmental concerns: What factors guide individual action? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 149–159.

Balliet

Parks

& Joireman

(2009). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta–analysis. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 12, 533–547.

Bamberg

& Möser

(2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta–analysis of psycho–social determinants of pro–environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25.

10.

Bradley

J. C.

Waliczek

T. M.

& Zajicek

J. M.

(1999). Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30, 17–21.

11.

Brekke

K. A.

& Johansson–Stenman

(2008). The behavioural economics of climate change. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24, 280–297.

12.

Chuah

S. C.

Drasgow

& Roberts

B. W.

(2006). Personality assessment: Does the medium matter? No. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 359–376.

13.

Costa

P. T.

& McCrae

R. R.

(2009). The Five–Factor Model and the NEO Inventories. In Butcher

J. N.

(Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality assessment (pp. 299–322). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

14.

Cronk

B. C.

& West

J. L.

(2002). Personality research on the internet: A comparison of web–based and traditional instruments in take–home and in–class settings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 177–180.

15.

Dawes

R. M.

(1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.

16.

De Cremer

& van Lange

P. A. M.

(2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15, S5–S18.

17.

De Jong

(1999). Hierarchical regression analysis in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 198–211.

18.

Gosling

S. D.

Vazire

Srivastava

& John

O. P.

(2004). Should we trust web–based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.

19.

Harland

Staats

& Wilke

H. A. M.

(1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2505–2528.

20.

Hasson

Lofgren

& Visser

(2010). Climate change in a public goods game: Investment decision in mitigation versus adaptation. Ecological Economics, 70, 331–338.

21.

Hilbig

B. E.

& Zettler

(2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty–Humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 516–519.

22.

Hilbig

B. E.

Zettler

& Heydasch

(2012). Personality, punishment, and public–goods: Strategic shifts towards cooperation as a matter of dispositional Honesty–Humility. European Journal of Personality, 26, 245–254.

23.

Hirsh

J. B.

(2010). Personality and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 245–248.

24.

Hirsh

J. B.

& Dolderman

(2007). Personality predictors of consumerism and environmentalism: A preliminary study. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1583–1593.

25.

L.–t.

& Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

26.

John

O. P.

& Srivastava

(1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin

L. A.

& John

O. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

27.

Kaiser

F. G.

(1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395–422.

28.

Kaiser

F. G.

& Byrka

(2011). Environmentalism as a trait: Gauging people's prosocial personality in terms of environmental engagement. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 71–79.

29.

Kaiser

F. G.

Byrka

& Hartig

(2010). Reviving Campbell's paradigm for attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 351–367.

30.

Kaiser

F. G.

Schultz

P. W.

& Scheuthle

(2007). The theory of planned behavior without compatibility? Bond method bias and past trivial associations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1522–1544.

31.

Kaiser

F. G.

Wölfing

& Fuhrer

(1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1–19.

32.

Kollock

(1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.

33.

Kraus

S. J.

(1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta–analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58–75.

34.

Lee

& Ashton

M. C.

(2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.

35.

Lee

& Ashton

M. C.

(2006). Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form. Psychological Assessment, 18, 182–191.

36.

Lee

& Ashton

M. C.

(2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76, 1001–1053.

37.

Lee

& Ashton

M. C.

(2012). Getting mad and getting even: Agreeableness and Honesty–Humility as predictors of revenge intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 596–600.

38.

Lee

Ashton

M. C.

Pozzebon

J. A.

Visser

B. A.

Bourdage

J. S.

& Ogunfowora

(2009). Similarity and assumed similarity in personality reports of well–acquainted persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 460–472.

39.

Lee

Ogunfowora

& Ashton

M. C.

(2005). Personality traits beyond the Big Five: Are they within the HEXACO space? Journal of Personality, 73, 1437–1463.

40.

Markowitz

E. M.

Goldberg

L. R.

Ashton

M. C.

& Lee

(2012). Profiling the “pro–environmental individual”: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality, 80, 81–111.

41.

McCrae

R. R.

Zonderman

A. B.

Costa

P. T.

Bond

M. H.

& Paunonen

S. V.

(1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552–566.

42.

Moshagen

(2012). The model size effect in SEM: Inflated goodness–of–fit statistics are due to the size of the covariance matrix. Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 86–98.

43.

Moshagen

Hilbig

B. E.

& Musch

(2011). Defection in the dark? A randomized–response investigation of cooperativeness in social dilemma games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 638–644.

44.

Muthén

B. O.

du Toit

S. H. C.

& Spisic

(1997). Robust interference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Available: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/muthen/articles/Article_075.pdf

45.

Muthén

L. K.

& Muthén

B. O.

(1998-2008). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

46.

Nordhaus

W. D.

(1993). Reflections on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 11–25.

47.

Reips

U.–D.

(2002). Standards for Internet–based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243–256.

48.

Sibley

C. G.

& Duckitt

(2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta–analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.

49.

Stern

P. C.

(2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.

50.

Stern

P. C.

Dietz

& Kalof

(1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322–348.

51.

Thøgersen

(1996). Recycling and morality: A critical review of the literature. Environment and Behavior, 28, 536–558.

52.

United Nations. n.d. Framework Convention on Climate Change: Status of Ratification of the Kyoto Protocol. Available: http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/status_of_ratification/items/2613.php [March 14, 2012]

53.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

(1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337–349.

54.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

De Bruin

E. M. N.

Otten

& Joireman

J. A.

(1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733–746.

55.

Zettler

Friedrich

& Hilbig

B. E.

(2011). Dissecting work commitment: The role of Machiavellianism. Career Development International, 16, 20–35.

56.

Zettler

& Hilbig

B. E.

(2010a). Attitudes of the selfless: Explaining political orientation with altruism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 338–342.

57.

Zettler

& Hilbig

B. E.

(2010b). Honesty–Humility and a person–situation–interaction at work. European Journal of Personality, 24, 569–582.

Tracing the Path from Personality — via Cooperativeness — to Conservation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References