An ecomap is a social work data collection tool that is used to gather data about a participant's environment. Derived from Bronfenbrenner's ecological system theory, the ecomap can be used in adult education and human resource development to record information of in–and–out–of–work and learning experiences and show how these interactions support or hurt an individual. Information about important interactions in an individual's life can help the staffs in organizations understand employees or adult learners in ways that may not surface with merely work or educational interactions. This first–hand knowledge of an individual's strengths or weaknesses can help the staff learn how to individualize employee and adult learner development. This personal knowledge can be an important part of an employee's and adult learner's performance, and personal and professional growth.
AllanC., LoudounR., PeetzD. (2007). Influences on work/non–work conflict. Journal of Sociology, 43 (3), 219–239, doi: 10.1177/1440783307080104.
2.
BarkerR. L. (Ed.) (2003). The social work dictionary(5th Ed).Washington, DC: National Association of Social Work Press.
3.
BogdanR.C. & BiklenS. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods(5th ed).New York, NY: Pearson Allen Bacon.
4.
BogenschneiderK. (1996). Family related prevention programs: An ecological risk/protective theory for building prevention programs, policies, and community capacity to support youth. Family Relations, 45, 127–138.
5.
BowenR.B., (2000). Recognizing and rewarding employees. New York: McGraw Hill.
6.
Bradley–LevineJ., PerkinsT. & RomanoG.(2010). Networks as Catalysts of Reform. UCEA: Paper presented at the UCEA Conference, New Orleans, 2010.
7.
BookchinM. (2005). The ecology of freedom: The emergence and dissolution of hierarchy. (Rev. ed.). Montreal: Black Rose.
8.
BronfenbrennerU. (1951). Toward an integrated theory of personality. In BlackR. & RemseyG. (Eds.), Perception: an approach to personality. New York, NY: Ronald Press.
9.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BuehlM. M., & AlexanderP. A. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain–specific epistemological belief profiles. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4).
11.
ClandininD. J. & ConnellyF. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass Inc., Publishers.
12.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions(3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
DeweyJ. (1963). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier Books.
16.
DruskatV.U., MountG., SalaF. (Eds). (2006). Linking emotional intelligence and performance at work: Current research evidence with individuals and groups. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
EliasM. J., ZinsJ.E., WeissbergR.P., FreyK.S., GreenbergM.T., HaynesN.M., KesslerR., Schwab–StoneM.E., & ShriverT.P. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guidelines for educators. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
18.
EliasM.J. (2004). Strategies to infuse social and emotional learning into academics. In ZinsJ.E., WeissbergR.P., WangM.C., WalbergH.J. (Eds). Building academic success on social emotional learning. New York, NY: Teacher's College Press.
19.
ElliottJ. (1991) Action research for educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
20.
GaikwadP. (2005). Emotional intelligence in the workplace. International Forum Journal, 8 (1–2), 5–14.
21.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
22.
GoodallJ. (2010). In the shadow of man. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
23.
GrantN. (2011. Adolescent perspectives of the ecological impact of a summer youth employment program. Wichita State University. Unpublished dissertation.
24.
HartmanA. (1995). Diagrammatic assessment of family relationships. Families in Society, 76 (2), 111–122.
25.
HodgeD. (2000). Spiritual ecomaps: A new diagrammatic tool for assessing marital and family spirituality. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26(2), 217–229.
26.
HolmesJ. (2014). Power and politeness in the workplace. New York: Routledge.
27.
KennedyV. (2010). Ecomaps. MAI Journal: A New Zealand Journal of Indigenous Scholarship.3, 1–12.
28.
LichtmanM. (2010). Qualitative research in education: A user's guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29.
LincolnJ.R. & KallebergA.L. (1992). Culture, control, and commitment: A study of work organization and work attitudes in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
LoscoccoK.A. & RoschelleA.R. (1991). Influence on the quality of work and nonwork life: Two decades in review. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39 (2), 182–225.
31.
McCormickK., StricklinS., NowakT., & RousB. (2005). Using ecomapping as a research tool. Research spotlight. University of Kentucky: National Early Childhood Transition Center.
32.
McLeroyK., BibeauD., StecklerA., & GlanzK. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), 351–377.
33.
MeadM. (Ed.) (2000). Cooperation and competition among primitive people. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
34.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design & implementation(3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
35.
MitraD. (2006). Youth as a bridge between home and school: Comparing student voice and parent involvement as strategies for change. Education and Urban Society, 38(4), 455–480.
36.
NortonL.S. (2009). Action research in teaching & learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. New York: Routledge.
37.
OstermanK.FurmanG., & SernakK. (2014). Action research in EdD programs in educational leadership. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 9 (1), 85–105. DOI: 10.1177.1942775.3498378.
38.
PattiJ. & LantieriL. (1999). Waging peace in schools: Social and emotional learning through conflict resolution. In CohenJ. (Ed). Educating minds and hearts: Social emotional learning and the passage into adolescence. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
39.
PeshkinA. (1991). The color of strangers, the color of friends: The play of ethnicity in school and community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
RaelinJ. (2006). Does action learning promote collaborative leadership. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5 (2), 152–168.
41.
RayR., & StreetA. (2005). Ecomapping: An innovative research tool for nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(5), 545–552.
42.
RoseR.C., BehL.UliJ. and IdrisK. (2010). Quality of work life: Implications of career dimensions. Journal of Social Science, 2 (2), 61–67.
43.
SchmuckR.A. (Ed). (2009). Practical action research (2nd ed): A collection of articles. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
44.
ScottS. (2004). Fierce conversations: Achieving success at work and in life one conversation at a time. NY: Berkley Book.
45.
ScottW.R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations(2nd ed).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
SerratO. (2009). Managing by walking around. Washington, D.C: Asian Development Bank.
47.
SomekhB. (1995). The contribution of action research to development in social endeavors: A position paper on action research methodology. British Educational Research Journal.21(3), 339 – 356.
48.
SpindlerG. (Ed). 1955. Education and anthropology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
49.
Stanton–SalazarR. (1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youth. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 1–40.
50.
Stanton–SalazarR. (2011). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role in the empowerment of low–status students and youth. Youth Society, 43 (3), 1066–1109.
51.
TuckerA.L. & SingerS.J. (2015). The effectiveness of management–by–walking–around: A randomized field study. Production & Operation Management, 24 (2), 253–271
52.
VoydanoffP. (2001). Conceptualizing community in the context of work and family. Community, Work & Family133–56.
53.
WhyteW.F. (1993). Street corner society: Social structure of an Italian slum (4th ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
WolcottH. (1975). Criteria for an ethnographic approach to research in schools. Human Organization, 34, 111–127.
