Concept maps (Cmaps) are still underutilized in adult literacy programs and classes. The teaching and learning approaches that have been used historically in adult literacy programs to address the learning needs of these students have not kept pace with the literacy skill demands that have sprung from the increased pace of technological innovation. This study investigated published reports of empirical research studies that have tested the effects of Cmaps on the achievement ability of a wide variety of learners. The literature review included 55 refereed journal articles. Our findings provide useful information for adult literacy practitioners interested in utilizing concept mapping as an approach to teaching and learning in their classes.
ArslanM. (2006). The influence of teaching note–taking and information mapping on learning and recalling in science. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5, 56–63.
2.
AusubelD. P., NovakJ. D., and HanesianH. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
3.
AusubelD. P., NovakJ. D., & HanesianH. (1986). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Werbel and Peck (reprinted).
4.
AusubelD. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton, Inc.
5.
AusubelD. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6.
BarenholzH., & TamirP. (1992). A comprehensive use of concept mapping in design instruction and assessment. Research in Science & Technological Education, 10(1), 37–52.
7.
BouJaoudeS., & AttiehM. (2008). The effect of using concept maps as study tools on achievement in chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 233–246.
8.
BrandtL., ElenJ., HellemansJ.HeermanL.CouwenbergI., Volckaert, L., & MorisseH. (2001). The impact of concept mapping and visualization on the learning of secondary school chemistry students. International Journal of Science Education, 23(12), 1303–1313.
9.
BriscoeC. & LaMasterS. U. (1991). Meaningful learning in college biology through concept mapping. The American Biology Teacher, 53, 214–219.
10.
BunttingC., CollR. K., & CampbellA. (2006). Student views of concept mapping in introductory tertiary biology classes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(4), 641–668.
11.
BoxtelC., van der LindenJ., RoelofsE., & ErkensG. (2002). Collaborative concept mapping: Provoking and supporting meaningful discourse. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 40–46.
12.
ChangK. E., SungY. T., & ChenS.F. (2001). Learning through computer–based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 21–33.
13.
ChangK. E., SungY. T., & ChenI. D. (2002).The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5–23.
14.
ChangS., & ChangY. (2008). Using online concept mapping with peer learning to enhance concept application. TheQuarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(1), 17–27.
15.
ChenC. S. (2002). Self–regulated learning strategies and achievement in an introduction to information systems course. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 20(1), 11–25.
16.
ChiouC. C. (2008). The effect of concept mapping on students’ learning achievements and interests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 375–387.
17.
ConradtyC. & BognerF.X. (2012). Knowledge presented in Cmaps: Correlations with conventional cognitive knowledge tests. Educational Studies, 38(3), 341–354.
18.
CzerniakC. M. & HaneyJ. J. (1998). The effect of collaborative concept mapping on elementary preservice teachers’ anxiety, efficacy, and achievement in physical science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(4), 303–320.
19.
DaleyB. J., CañasA. J. & Stark–SchweitzerT. (2007). CmapTools: Integrating teaching, learning, and evaluation in online courses. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2007(113), 37–47.
20.
DerbentsevaN., SafayeniF., & CañasA. (2007). Concept maps: Experiments on dynamic thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 448–465.
21.
ErdoganY. (2009). Paper–based and computer–based concept mappings: The effects on computer achievement, computer anxiety and computer attitude. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 821–836.
22.
General Educational Development Testing Service (2009). 2008 GED Testing Program Statistical Report. Washington: American Council on Education.
23.
GerstnerS. & BognerF. X. (2010). Cognitive achievement and motivation in hands–on and teacher–centered science classes: Does an additional hands–on consolidation phase (concept mapping) optimise cognitive learning at work stations?International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 849–870.
24.
GuastelloE. F., BeasleyM. T., & Sinatra (2000). Concept mapping effects on science content comprehension of low–achieving inner–city seventh graders. Remedial and Special Education, 21(6), 356–365.
25.
GrubbN. (1999). Honored but invisible: An inside look at teaching in community colleges. New York: Routledge.
26.
HasemannK., & MansfieldH. (1995). Concept mapping in research on mathematical knowledge development: Background, methods, findings and conclusions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(1), 45–72.
27.
HilbertT. S., & RenklA. (2008). Concept mapping as a follow–up strategy to learning from texts: What characterizes good and poor mappers?Instructional Science, 36(1), 53–73.
28.
HinckS. M., WebbP., Sims–GiddensS., HeltonC., HopeK. L., UtleyR., & YarbroughS. (2006). Student learning with concept mapping of care plans in community–based education. Journal of Professional Nursing, 22(1), 23–29.
29.
HsuL. L. (2004). Developing Cmaps from problem–based learning scenario discussions. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(5), 510–518.
30.
HwangG. J., WuP. H., & KeH. R. (2011). An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2272–2280.
31.
IngeçS. K. (2009). Analysing Cmaps as an assessment tool in teaching physics and comparison with the achievement tests. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1897–1915.
32.
JegedeO. J., AlaiyemolaF. F., & OkebukolaP.A. (1990). The effect of concept mapping on students’ anxiety and achievement in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 951–960.
33.
JohnsonD. D., PittelmanS. D., & HeimlichJ. E. (1986). Semantic mapping. The Reading Teacher, 778–783.
34.
KarpickeJ. D., & BluntJ. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772–775.
35.
KeenanC. (2009). Statement before the House Education and Labor Subcommittee on Higher Education. Lifelong Learning, and Competitiveness, (February 26, 2009).
36.
KostovaZ., & RadoynovskaB. (2010). Motivating students’ learning using word association test and Cmaps. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 4(1), 62–98.
37.
LiuP. L., ChenC. J., & ChangY. J. (2010). Effects of a computer–assisted concept mapping strategy on EFL college students’ English reading comprehension. Computers and Education, 54(2), 436–445. Retrieved from www.elsevier.com/locate/compedu.
38.
LiuX. (2004). Using concept mapping for assessing and promoting relational conceptual change in science. Wiley Periodicals, Inc., 88(3), 373–396.
39.
MarkowP. G., & LonningR. A. (1998). Usefulness of concept maps in college chemistry laboratories: Students’ perceptions and effects on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 1015–1029.
40.
McGaghieW. C., McCrimmonD. R., MitchellG., ThompsonJ. A., & RavitchM. M. (2000). Quantitative concept mapping in pulmonary physiology: Comparison of student and faculty knowledge structures. Advances in Physiology Education, 23(1), 72–81.
41.
McKeachieW. J. (1988). The need for study strategy training. In WeinsteinC. E., GoetzE. T., & AlexanderP. A. (Eds.), Learning and Study Strategies: Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation (pp. 3–9). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
42.
NesbitJ. C. & AdesopeO. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta–analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448.
43.
NicollG., FranciscoJ., & NakhlehM. (2001). An investigation of the value of using Cmaps in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(8), 1111–1117.
44.
NistS. L., & SimpsonM. L. (1989). PLAE, A validated study strategy. Journal of Reading, 33, 182–186.
45.
NovakJ. & GowinB. (1984). Learning how to learn. London: Cambridge University Press.
46.
NovakJ. D., & CañasA. J. (2006). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
47.
Purcell–GatesV., DegenerS., & JacobsonE. (1998). US adult literacy program practice: A typology across dimensions of life–contextualized/decontextualized and dialogic/monologic (No. 2). Cambridge, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy.
48.
OkebukolaP. A. (1990). Attaining meaningful learning of concepts in genetics and ecology: An examination of the potency of the concept–mapping technique. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 493–504.
49.
OkebukolaP. A. (1992). Concept mapping with a cooperative learning flavor. The American Biology Teacher, 54, 218–221.
50.
OkebukolaP. A., & JegedeO. J. (1988). Cognitive preference and learning mode as determinants of meaningful learning through concept mapping. Science Education, 72(4), 489–500.
51.
OkoyeN. S. & OkechukwuR. N. (2010).The effect of concept mapping and problem solving teaching strategies on achievement in biology among Nigerian secondary students. Education, 131(2), 288–291.
52.
OzmenH., DemirciogulG., & CollR. K. (2009). A comparative study of the effects of a concept mapping enhanced laboratory experiences on Turkish high school students’ understanding of acid–base chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 1–24.
53.
PankratiusW. J. (1990). Building an organized knowledge base: Concept mapping and achievement in secondary school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(4), 315–333.
54.
RedfordJ. S., ThiedeK. W., WileyJ., & GriffinT.D. (2012). Concept mapping improves metacomprehension accuracy among 7th graders. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 262–270. Retrieved from www.elsevier.com/locate/learninstruc.
55.
ReutzelD. R. (1986). Clozing in on comprehension: The cloze story map. The Reading Teacher, 39, 524–528.
56.
Ruiz–PrimoM. A., SchultzS. E., LiM., & ShavelsonR. J. (2001). Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept–mapping techniques. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 260–278.
57.
RileyN. R. & AhlbergM. (2004). Investigating the use of ICT–based concept mapping techniques on creativity in literacy tasks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(4), 244–256.
58.
RitchieD. & VolklC. (2000). Effectiveness of two generative learning strategies in the science classroom. Social Science and Mathematics, 100(2), 83–89.
59.
RoyerR. & RoyerJ. (2004). Comparing hand drawn and computer generated concept mapping. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(1), 67–81.
60.
SanthanamE., LeachC. & DawsonC. (1998). Concept mapping: How should it be introduced, and is there evidence for long term benefit?Higher Education, 35(3), 317–328.
61.
SchauC., MatternN., ZeilikM., TeagueK. W., & WeberR. J. (2001). Select–and–fill–in concept map scores as a measure of students’ connected understanding of science. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(1), 136–158.
62.
ScholesR. J., & LainM. M. (1997). The effect of test preparation on ACT Assessment scores. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.
63.
SchmidR. F. & TelaroG. (1990). Concept mapping as an instructional strategy for high school biology. Journal of Educational Research, 84(2), 78–85.
64.
SchwartzR. M. & RaphaelT. E. (1985). Concept of definition: A key to improving students’ vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 39, 198–205.
65.
ScruggsT. E., & MastropieriM. A. (1984). Issues in generalization: Implications for special education. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 397–403.
66.
SkinnerB. F. (1948). “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.
67.
SneadD. & YoungB. (2003). Using concept mapping to aid African American students ‘ understanding in middle grade science. The Journal of Negro Education, 72, 333–343. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3211251
68.
StensvoldM. S.WilsonJ. T. (1990). The interaction of verbal ability with concept mapping in learning from a chemistry laboratory activity. Science Education, 74(4), 473–480.
69.
StoyanovaN., & KommersP. (2002). Concept mapping as a medium of shared cognition in computer–supported collaborative problem solving. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(1), 111–133.
70.
StrumJ. M., & Rankin–Erickson (2002). Effects of hand–drawn and computer–generated concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17(2), 124–139.
71.
TanS. C. (2000). The effects of incorporating concept mapping into computer assisted instruction. Journal of. Educational Computing Research, 23(2), 113–131.
72.
TrifoneJ. D. (2006). To what extent can concept mapping motivate students to take a more meaningful approach to learning biology?The Science Education Review, 5(4) 122:1–23.
73.
TylerJ. H. (2005). The general educational development (GED) credential: History, current research, and directions for policy and practice. Review of adult learning and literacy, 5, 45–84.
74.
UzuntiryakiE. & GebanO. (2005). Effect of conceptual change approach accompanied with concept mapping on understanding of solution concepts. Instructional Science, 33(4), 311–339.
75.
WalkerJ. M., & KingP. H. (2003). Concept mapping as a form of student assessment and instruction in the domain of bioengineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(2), 167–178.
76.
WatsonJ. B. (1913). Psychology as a behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158–177.
77.
WheelerL. A.&CollinsS. K. R.(2003). The influence of concept mapping on critical thinking in Baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 19(6), 339–346.
78.
WilkesL., CooperK., LewinJ., &BattsJ.(1999). Concept mapping: Promoting science learning in BN learners in Australia. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 30(1), 37–44.
