Performance—the achievement of results–is central to definitions of HRD. Performance Technology (HPT) refers to a systematic methodology for developing performance in individuals and organizations. Through a systematic process, HPT explores issues at the organizational, unit, and individual level, and with skills and knowledge, resources, and motivation. perceive several advantages of HPT: an explanation of why training alone often fails to achieve the intended results, a systematic approach, a scientific foundation and emphasis on empirical data, and the promise of more enriching jobs. reality is more nuanced: too much similarity between the HPT and instructional systems design models, a continued over–reliance on training; a lack of actual empirical evidence to support it; and its failure to actually provide more. continues to influence HRD, but perhaps HRD represents a more evolved approach.
ArthurW., BennetW., EdensP.S. and BellS. T. (2003). Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta–analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychnology.88(2). 234–245.
3.
BrethowerD. (2012.) The future of HPT depends on whether practitioners focus on foundations or fads, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 24(1), 47–58.
4.
CarlinerS. (2002.) Training Design Basics. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
5.
CarlinerS. & HamlinR. G. (In press, 2014)Certification and its implications for HRD. In RoccoT., RothE. & PoellR. (In preparation.) Companion to Human Resource Development. New York: Routledge.
6.
ChoY. & ParkS. (2012.) Content analysis of the 20 most influential articles in PIQ, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 24(3), 7–22.
7.
ChyungS. Y. (2008.) Foundations of Instructional Performance Technology. Amherst MA: HRD Press.
8.
ConnC.A. & GitongaJ. (2004). The status of training and performance research in the AECT journals, Tech Trends, 48(2), 16–21.
9.
FarringtonJ. (2012.) A rose by any other name. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 24(1), 27–34.
GilbertT. F. (2007.) Human Competence: Engineering Worthy Performance (Tribute Edition). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
12.
GithensR. P., DiraniK., GitongaJ., & TengY. T. (2008.) Technology–related research in HRD publications: An analysis of content and metaperspectives from 2000 to 2006. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19(3), 191–215.
International Society for Performance Improvement (ISPI). (2013a.) What is HPT? Viewed at http://www.ispi.org/content.aspx?id=54. Visited November 29, 2013.
KleinJ.D. (2010.) Research on performance improvement: Where's the beef?Performance Improvement, 49(2), 5–7.
18.
KleinJ.D. (2002.) Empirical research on performance improvement. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15, (1), 99–110.
19.
MarkerA., HuglinL., & JohnsenL. (2006). Empirical research on performance improvement: An update. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(4), 7–22.
20.
RothwellW. J. (1998.) ASTD Models for Human Performance Improvement: Roles, Competencies, and Outputs. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
21.
RummlerG.A. & BracheA. P. (2013.) Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
StolovitchH. S. & KeepsE. J. (2004.) Training Ain't Performance. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
24.
StolovitchH. S. & KeepsE. J. (1999.) Handbook of Human Performance Technology (2nd ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
25.
SwansonR. A. (1996.) Training for Performance System Field Handbook. Minneapolis, MN: Swanson & Associates, Inc.
26.
SwansonR. A. & HoltonE. F. (2001.) Foundations of Human Resource Development (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett–Kohler.
27.
Van TiemD. M., MoseleyJ. L., & DessingerJ.C. (2012.) Fundamentals of Performance Improvement: Optimizing Results through People, Processes, and Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
28.
WeinbergerL.A. (1998.) Commonly held theories of human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 1(1), 75–93.
