AryD., Cheser JacobsL.C., RazaviehA., A., & Sorenson. (2005). Introduction to research in education. Florence, KY: Wadsworth.
2.
BloomB. (1984). The 2–sigma problem: the search for methods of group instruction as effective as one–on–one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16.
3.
ChurchillG. A., FordN. M., & WalkerO.C. (1985). Sales force management: planning, implementation, and control. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
4.
ConnorJ. (1983). On–the–job training. Boston: International Human Resources Development Corporation.
5.
CushnieM. (1999). African–American women first–line supervisors: a qualitative study of their career development process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
6.
GlaserR., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies of qualitative research. Londao: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
7.
GubaE. (1978). Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, UCLA Graduate School of Education, University of California.
8.
JacobsR. (1997a). HRD is not the research problem. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8(1), 1–3.
9.
JacobsR. (1997b). Partnerships for integrating HRD research and practice. In SwansonR. & HoltonE. (eds.), Human Resource Development Research Handbook: linking research and practice. San Francisco: Berrett–Koehler, 47–61.
10.
HersheyD.A., Jacobs–LawsonJ.M., & WilsonT.L. (2006). Research as a script. In LeongF.T., and AustinJ. (eds.), The psychology research handbook: a guide for graduate students and research assistants. San Francisco: Sage, 3–22.
11.
JacobsR., & Osman–GaniA.A. (1999). Structured on–the–job training: Status, impacts, and implementation issues in Singapore organizations. Human Resource Development International, 2(1), 17–24.
12.
KerlingerF. N., & LeeH. B. (1999). Foundations of behavioral research. Florence, KY: Wadsworth.
13.
LinY.C. (2006). The perceptions of human resource development professionals in Taiwan regarding their working relationships with subject–matter experts (SMEs) during the training design process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
14.
LynhamS. A. (2002). The general method of theory–building research in applied disciplines. In S. Lynham, (ed.), Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 221–241.
15.
MafiS. (2000). Testing the appropriateness of the gap service–management model to the human resource development function in organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
16.
McManusS. E., & RussellJ. (1997). New directions for mentoring research: an examination of related constructs. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51(1), 145–161.
17.
MerriamS.M., & SimpsonE. (1995). A guide to research for educators and trainers of adults. Malabar, FL: Kreiger.
18.
ShulmanL. S., GoldeC. M., Conklin BueschelA., & GarabedianK. J. (2006, April). Reclaiming education's doctorates: a critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 25–31.
19.
State of the Industry Report: ASTD's Annual Review of Trends in Workplace Learning and Performance. (2008). Alexandria, VA: ASTD.
20.
StebbinsRobert A. (2001). Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
SwansonR.A., & HoltonE.F. (2005). Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry. San Francisco: Berrett:Koehler.
22.
Van de VenA., & JohnsonP. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.
23.
WrightA., MurrayJ. P., & GealeP. (2007). A phenomenographic study of what it means to supervise doctoral students. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(4), 458–474.