AstinA. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297–308.
2.
boyd, d. (2008). Why youth social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In BuckinghamD. (Ed.), Youth, identity and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. doi: 10.1162/dmal.9780262524834.119.
3.
BrockA. (2012). From the blackhand side: Twitter as a cultural conversation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 529–549.
4.
ChaM., HaddadiH., BenevenutoF., & GummadiK. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. Presented at the Fourth International Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Conference on Weblogs and Social Media
5.
CoursarisC. K., YunY., & SungJ. (2010, June). Twitter users vs. quitters: A uses and gratifications and diffusion of innovations approach in understanding the role of mobility in microblogging. Presented at the Ninth Annual International Conference on Mobile Business & 2010 Ninth Global Mobility Roundtable Conference, Athens, Greece. doi: 10.1109/ICMB-GMR.2010.44.
6.
GreenhowC., & RobeliaB. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media, & Technology, 34, 119–140. doi: 10.1080/17439880902923580.
7.
HargittaiE. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non–users of social network sites. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication. 13, 276–297. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/hargittai.html
8.
HeibergerG., & HarperR. (2008). Have you Facebooked Astin lately? Using technology to increase student involvement. New Directions for Student Services. 124(Winter), 19–35.
9.
HenryS. K. (2012). On social connection in university life. About Campus, 16(6), 18–24.
JohnsonP. R., & YangS.–U. (2009, August). Uses and gratifications of Twitter: An examination of user motives and satisfaction of Twitter use. Presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Convention: Communication Technology Division, Boston, Massachusetts.
12.
JuncoR., & ChickeringA. W. (2010). Civil discourse in the age of social media. About Campus, 15(4), 12–18.
13.
JuncoR., HeibergertG., & LokenE. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 119–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x.
14.
LivingstoneS., & BoberM. (2004). Taking up online opportunities? Children's uses of the internet for education, communication and participation. E–Learning. 1, 395–419.
PorterS. R., & UmbachP. D. (2006). College major choice: An analysis of person–environment fit. Research in Higher Education, 47, 429–448. doi: 10.1007/s11162-0059002-3.
RibbleM. S., BaileyG. D., & RossT. W. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology. 32(1), 7–12.
SternM. J., AdamsA. E., & ElsasserS. (2009, November). Digital inequality and place: The effects of technological diffusion on internet proficiency and usage across rural, suburban, and urban counties. Social Inquiry. 79, 391–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00302.x.
24.
TumasjanA., SprengerT. O., SandnerP. G., & WelpeI. M. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Presented at the Fourth International Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC.
25.
ValenzuelaS., ParkN., & KeeK. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication, 14, 875–901. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x.