Background

The effectiveness of arthroscopic treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA) has been controversial. This study compares the clinical outcomes of the arthroscopic cartilage regeneration facilitating procedure (ACRFP) and conservative treatment.

Methods

During the year of 2016, 524 patients (882 knees) who were older than 40 years of age and diagnosed with different stages of knee OA were scheduled for ACRFP under the protocol of knee health promotion option (KHPO) for knee OA. Of those, 259 patients (413 knees) eventually received ACRFP (the ACRFP group), and 265 patients (469 knees) didn’t receive ACRFP but received conservative treatment (the non-ACRFP group). A telephone questionnaire was used to evaluate the subjective satisfaction and the incidence of receiving arthroplasty for these patients.

Results

After the mean follow-up period of 61.6 months (SD 4.5), there were 220 patients (374 knees, 90.6%) in the ACRFP group and 246 patients (431 knees, 90.0%) in the non-ACRFP group completed the outcome study. The satisfactory rate was statistically higher for the ACRFP group (90.64%) than for the non-ACRFP group (70.3%) and the difference in subjective satisfaction was more obvious in patients with more advanced knee OA. As for the incidence of patients having subsequently received arthroplasty, it was higher (13.46%) in the non-ACRFP group than in the ACRFP group (4.28%).

Conclusion

Compared with conservative treatment, ACRFP could satisfy more patients with knee OA and modify their natural course by decreasing the incidence of subsequent arthroplasty.

Search results

Arthroscopic cartilage regeneration facilitating procedure can modify the clinical course of knee osteoarthritis