Research article
Separate Spaces,Separate Outcomes? Neighbourhood Impacts on Minorities in Germany
Anita I. Drever
Abstract
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal
This article explores the role played by community sector organisations in terms of community participation and local governance. It focuses on organisations concerned with waste reduction, reuse and recycling-community waste projects. The current UK government has high expectations of the potential and actual role of the community sector in service delivery. To indicate how these expectations might be fulfilled, the article employs the local governance perspective and reviews claims made for the role played by the community sector in governance processes. The local linkages of community waste projects are then assessed through a 'policy-action' continuum. The article concludes that community waste projects provide significant opportunities for volunteer involvement in their activities. They also have significant impacts on waste governance, through service delivery and participation in related policy processes. However, suggestions that community sector organisations can represent the wishes of local people in policy processes should be treated with caution.
The paper builds on the results of Clark and Stabler who associated Gibrat's law on the independence of growth rate and city size with unit root tests. The paper proposes a direct test of the unit root hypothesis for firm size based on recently developed panel data unit root tests. The results for a sample of Brazilian cities over the period 1980-2000 favour Gibrat's law. Moreover, the results are robust when one considers sub-samples defined for different population sizes and age of municipality.
Historical designation has become an important tool in efforts to revitalise central-city neighbourhoods. Yet designation has also come under scrutiny because of its presumed association with gentrification and displacement of lower-income residents. Using Fort Worth, Texas, as a case study, the paper asks whether historical designation is associated with demographic change in neighbourhoods. It is found that historically designated areas started out with slightly worse neighbourhood indicators than those without designation—a finding that is consistent with the idea that preservation efforts are targeted to areas in 'need' of revitalisation. However, we find no evidence that preservation efforts altered the demographic composition of neighbourhoods. This finding runs counter to the notion that historic preservation is a precursor to gentrification.

