
Other
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal



Cancer is a growth process and it is natural that we should be concerned with how the routinely used marker of prostate cancer tumour burden –PSA –changes over time. Such change is measured by PSA velocity or PSA doubling time, described in general as “PSA kinetics”. However, it turns out that calculation of PSA velocity and doubling time is far from straightforward. More than 20 different methods have been proposed, and many of these give quite divergent results. There is clear evidence that PSA kinetics are critical for understanding prognosis in advanced or relapsed prostate cancer. However, PSA kinetics have no value for men with an untreated prostate: neither PSA velocity nor doubling time have any role in diagnosing prostate cancer or providing a prognosis for men before treatment.
To report our experience of intravesical botulinum toxin for idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) without detrusor overactivity (DOA) on urodynamic assessment.
Data regarding presentation, diagnosis, urodynamic findings, date and dose of treatment, and outcomes were recorded prospectively for 94 patients undergoing intravesical botulinum toxin injection for idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome at our institution. The cohort included 19 patients without DOA on urodynamics. A positive response to treatment was defined as patient-reported improvement without the need for further treatment. ICIQ-OAB and UI scores, and bladder diary parameters were also recorded. Rates of urinary retention requiring intermittent or indwelling catheterisation were noted.
The overall response rate to treatment was 82% (
These preliminary, non-randomised data suggest that intravesical botulinum toxin injection may be efficacious in patients with OAB symptoms without DOA. Further evaluation by means of a randomised, controlled trial is suggested.
A review of our experience in laparoscopic simple nephrectomies from May 2003 to May 2011 in the Urology Departments in Oxford and Reading.
A total of 100 patients, median age 46years (IQR = 27, range 17–82) underwent a laparoscopic simple nephrectomy for benign disease in the 8-year period reviewed. Data on patient demographics, pre-operative diagnosis, operating time, operative approach, estimated blood loss, in hospital post-operative complications and length of stay were collected from electronic databases held in the departments and regularly updated.
100 laparoscopic simple nephrectomies were performed between May 2003 and May 2011. Median operating time was 180min (IQR = 60min, range 75–375min). Median estimated blood loss was 50ml (IQR = 50ml, range 10–1000ml). Median length of stay was 3 days (IQR = 3, range 2–14 days). No patients suffered from significant changes in renal function. Three patients were transfused between 2 and 3 units. 26 complications were recorded for 22 patients. Four were Clavien grade IIIb and 22 were grades I—II.
Although laparoscopic simple nephrectomy is feasible and confers the usual benefits of laparoscopy it is often a technically challenging procedure. We used the Clavien Classification to standardise complications of laparoscopic simple nephrectomies. The term “simple” nephrectomy is misleading and should be changed.
There is still much debate regarding the long-term effect of 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) on the development of prostate cancer (PC). We tested the incidence of prostate cancer and the tumour Gleason grading in a non-screened population who were prescribed 5-ARIs for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Data from a prostatic biopsy database were analysed in a retrospective study, and included a period of 14 years (01/01/1997 to 01/01/2011). Those patients who were on 5-ARIs with either finasteride or dutasteride for less than 1 year were excluded. Patients who presented with LUTS and underwent diagnostic prostatic biopsies were included in this study. This patient cohort was further categorised according to their history of 5-ARIs medication.
The incidence of PC in the 5-ARI treated group was 15.4% (
In this retrospective study, patients treated with 5-ARIs for LUTS had similar risk in developing PC when compared to those who did not receive 5-ARIs. The Gleason sum scores for the cancers were similar in the two groups.



