
Research article
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal






In the United States, approximately 4 million surgical procedures are performed on children every year. Unfortunately, severe postsurgical pain is common. Patients who still have moderate-to-severe postsurgical pain 1 month after a surgical procedure are at risk for deterioration of their health-related quality of life and the development of chronic postsurgical pain. Despite the magnitude of effects that postsurgical pain can have on a child, it is often inadequately assessed and treated because of the wrong notion that children neither experience or feel pain nor respond to or remember painful experiences to the same degree as adults. PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE (R), PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were searched for current research and literature that examine the use of hypnosis to manage pain for children undergoing surgical procedures during their postoperative recovery period. Although the literature supports a paucity of hypnosis research in children undergoing surgical procedures, four studies were found suggesting that hypnosis may be an effective tool to decrease postsurgical pain for children. The current state of the science leaves many opportunities to improve on the postoperative pain management strategies for children recovering from surgical procedures.
Nausea and vomiting, which are unpleasant clinical problems in the postoperative period, have negative outcomes related to patient satisfaction, morbidity, hospital stay, and medical costs. Nausea and/or vomiting may cause tracheal aspiration when unconscious after anesthesia, rupture of wound site, wound infection, recurrent and severe dehydration, and electrolyte impairments with pediatric surgery patients. It is very important to detect and prevent these clinical problems at an early period. Therefore, it is necessary to objectively assess nausea, which is a subjective perception. The aim of the current study was to discover the validity and reliability of the Baxter Animated Retching Faces (BARF) Nausea Scale among pediatric surgery patients.
The sample of the study, which was in methodological model, consisted of 82 children aged 7-18 years who were treated at inpatient pediatric surgery clinics. The BARF Nausea Scale is a pictorial nausea scale that rates nausea from neutral (no nausea) to emesis (maximum nausea) with six items and six face expressions that describe each of these items. The scale was developed in the English language and includes assessments based on perceptions; Turkish translation and back-translation procedures were not performed. For the content validity, expert reviews were obtained. While the findings obtained from the study were being evaluated, descriptive statistical methods, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov distribution test, the Mann–Whitney
Sixty-one percent of the children aged 7-18 years were male. It was identified that 50% of the children were operated because of gastrointestinal problems, 81.1% of them did not get premedication, 91.5% of them did not use antiemetic medicines, and 41.5% of them started to eat 5-6 hours later after the surgery. It was noted that opinions of all the experts were consistent in terms of content validity and that BARF and the visual analog scale, which was found to be suitable for the Turkish people, could statistically be accepted as equal (Cochran's
In the parallel test in which the visual analog scale and BARF were compared, it was understood that BARF was reliable in assessing nausea and vomiting. In light of these results, it may be suggested that the BARF Nausea Scale was a valid and reliable tool in theoretically measuring nausea–vomiting. It is recommended that the BARF Nausea Scale be used for children over 7 years old to measure nausea after operations.
Medical simulation technology as a whole allows the clinical situation to be better understood, controlled, and practiced and is a reproduction of reality that provides a replication of clinical situations through the use of interactive videos, mannequins, and role playing (Cannon-Diehl, 2009). With the use of medical simulation technology, learners are able to practice skills and role-play different scenarios without causing harm to a patient, thus lessening stressful experiences during similar real-life situations (Hebda & Czar, 2013). This practice helps to improve the quality of care given to patients and, in turn, helps to save lives. Simulation also leads to increased confidence and skills of participants.
With an ever increasing importance placed on patient outcomes in regard to reimbursement from insurance companies and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, it is the responsibility of all medical professionals to perform at peak levels during all patient care situations, especially during emergent ones. This harkens back to both the Hippocratic Oath and the Nightingale Pledge in which respondents promise to practice to the best of their abilities and keep the patient's best interest in mind (American Nurses Association, 2012). The opportunity to participate in simulation allows these oaths to be upheld and patients to be cared for by practitioners who are comfortable conducting themselves appropriately and competently within high-stress situations.