
Research article
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal


Transplantation is considered the treatment of choice for end-stage organ failure in most organ systems. Kidney transplantation is cost-saving as compared with dialysis, and the cost utility of liver transplantation is favorable compared with other accepted medical interventions; nonetheless, transplantation is an expensive endeavor. As a result, both hospitals and payers have made considerable efforts to try to limit the costs associated with transplantation; these efforts have resulted in complicated reimbursement schemes and a variety of models to deliver care. It is in this context that many institutions have looked to incorporate advanced practice professionals in the care of transplant patients. The ability to use advanced practice professionals in a cost-effective manner can be enhanced by an understanding of how reimbursement in transplantation works and the legal and financial implications of their employment.
Nurse practitioners are nurses who are prepared at the graduate level. They exercise autonomy in clinical decision making, perform physical examinations and obtain health histories, diagnose and treat a variety of illnesses, provide education and counseling to patients, perform procedures, and ultimately provide cost-effective care. The role of the nurse practitioner evolved in the 1960s, when nurse practitioners filled a void in response to the nationwide shortage of physicians. Today, nurse practitioners specialize both by degree and by certification examination. There are several types of nurse practitioners, including acute care, adult, family practice, and pediatric. The incorporation of acute care nurse practitioners (ACNPs) in transplant programs is an emerging field and varies across the country from center to center. The goals of this article are to (1) identify implications for ACNPs in transplant, (2) discuss the value of using ACNPs in practice, and (3) explore billing and regulatory aspects of ACNPs in transplant programs.
Clinical nurse educators are advanced practice nurses with preparation at the master's level or higher. Such nurses play an important role in organ procurement organizations. As leaders and members of the team, they provide structure and design to the training process. These educators oversee orientation of new employees, serve as mentors to preceptors, assess the learning needs of the organization, and provide ongoing training to veteran staff. Clinical nurse educators also contribute to continuous quality improvement for the organization and help to comply with regulatory standards.
Nurse practitioners are a critical part of the transplant team, enhancing the quality of patient care with their knowledge and skill with respect to disease-specific populations of patients. Adolescent transplant recipients are a vulnerable population and require specific considerations. Nurse practitioners can successfully tailor care to the adolescent developmental stages in order to promote quality of life, adherence to the medical regimen, and successful transition to adult transplant centers and to minimize risk-taking behaviors. Teamwork between the patient's family and the entire transplant team is important to optimize not only the patient's health but also to ensure quality of life after transplant. Adolescents can be especially challenging after transplant, given their complex and evolving psychosocial and cognitive development. Nurse practitioners are in a unique position to be central in adolescents' successful adaptation to their medical condition. Facilitating identification and management of medication-related side effects, awareness of emotional health and quality of life, adherence to the medical regimen, and eventual transition to adult caregivers all remain critically important steps in care that are ideally suited for advance practice leadership.
Despite increased rates of solid organ transplantation and frequent use of advanced practice nurses (APNs) to manage patients, no established staffing model including APNs and their roles exists.
To characterize the role and integration of APNs in the staffing models of existing transplant centers.
Descriptive research using a researcher-designed survey of transplant APN professionals.
53 attendees of a national APN transplant clinical management symposium.
Investigator-designed survey tool consisting of 21 questions delivered in a paper format with 1 open-ended question about adequacy of current staffing and ideas for improvement.
53 responses from staff members of 21 different transplant centers were collected. In addition to APNs, members of existing transplant staffing models were identified as licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, social workers, administrative assistants, and data managers. The primary responsibilities of APNs were both inpatient and outpatient, before and after transplant, and consisted primarily of collecting patients' medical histories, doing physical examinations, handling clinic visits, and education. Licensed practical and registered nurses handled pretransplant referral management and phone triage duties. Social workers, administrative assistants, and data managers were responsible for social support, medical record management, and regulatory documentation, respectively. Most respondents (57%) found current staffing to be inadequate in their centers and suggested areas for improvement.
APNs play a vital role in management of transplant patients. Transplant centers use APNs in different capacities, depending on the individual needs of the institution. Across institutions, support staff is crucial in the perception of adequate staffing. Additional research is needed to determine the most efficient use of APNs in transplant centers.
Despite the initiative for nurses to engage in evidence-based practice and research, little is known about transplant nurses and the role they play in research and evidence-based practice in nursing care. The definition of evidence-based practice and research and how it relates to the role of the transplant nurse, the facilitators and barriers to research and evidence-based practice, and the implications for the future of research and evidence-based practice in transplant nursing are addressed.
It is well documented that kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for children with end-stage renal disease. Pediatric kidney transplant patients are a complex population because of their need for lifelong immunosuppression, potential for delayed growth and development, and increased risk of heart disease and cancer. Although many large pediatric kidney transplant programs use nurse practitioners, the role of the nurse practitioner is still emerging in relation to the transplant coordinator role. This article describes the practice of pediatric nurse practitioners caring for children who require a kidney transplant and why nurse practitioners are ideal for providing comprehensive care to this population. Transplant programs are regulated by the United Network for Organ Sharing and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Both organizations require transplant programs to designate a transplant coordinator with the primary responsibility of coordinating clinical aspects of transplant care. Incorporating transplant coordinator activities into the role of the pediatric nurse practitioner is discussed as a model for providing care throughout the process of kidney transplantation. Transplant pediatric nurse practitioners are in a unique position to expand the care for pediatric kidney transplant patients by assuming the role of clinician, educator, administrator, and coordinator.
For decades, live organ donors have been cared for within the transplant program by the same team that cared for the recipient without any standardization, practice guidelines, or evidence-based evaluation. In an effort to improve the care of living donors, regulations and guidelines to dictate care and follow-up have been instituted. Practices still vary from center to center, and the quality of care that live donors receive also varies. A “Living Donor Center” focused solely on the care of actual and potential donors before and after donation is one way to provide the infrastructure to comply with regulatory mandates and deliver high-quality care to this specialized population of patients. A Center for Living Donation was developed within a Transplantation Institute to address the short- and long-term needs of live donors and confine all donor care to a team of experts led by a doctorally prepared nurse practitioner as the director. A transplant nurse practitioner is uniquely poised to assume such a role because of such competencies as clinical and professional leadership, ability to act as a change agent, communication skills, and ability to lead a multidisciplinary team.
Despite the increase in rates of solid organ transplantation in the past 2 decades, nurses are inconsistently educated regarding issues of organ donation and posttransplant care.
To characterize the attitudes of registered nurses before and after a graduate-level elective on issues in transplantation.
Pre-experimental, pretest and posttest interventional study
30 graduate students, who are registered nurses, who enrolled in a transplant elective at a university in the Southeastern United States
Investigator-designed survey tool consisting of 18 questions delivered in an electronic format.
Statistically significant results were seen in nurses' attitudes toward encouraging others to become organ donors (
These results support the need for providing focused education on transplantation issues to registered nurses, particularly in the academic setting.
Although medication nonadherence is associated with severe complications including graft rejection and loss, its prevalence remains high among organ transplant recipients. Still, little information exists on clinical use of interventions to improve medication adherence.
To identify transplant health care professionals' methods of assessing medication adherence, classify the used interventions, and measure those interventions' perceived effectiveness.
A 46-item questionnaire on adherence assessment and interventions was distributed at the 2010 International Transplant Nurses Society symposium in Germany. Data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics.
Of 141 distributed questionnaires, 94 (67%) were returned. Respondents with no direct patient contact (9%, n = 8) were excluded. The most frequently used assessment strategy was patient self-reporting (60%, n = 52). On average, participants reported using 47% of the educational/cognitive, 44% of the counseling/behavioral, and 42% of the psychological/affective interventions listed. Training patients to self-administer medications and providing printed adherence information were the most frequently used interventions (79% each, n = 68), followed by providing printed medication instructions (69%, n = 59). Most respondents (90%, n = 77) reported combining interventions. The intervention perceived as most effective was medication self-administration training.
Although available alternatives are demonstrably more effective for enhancing medication adherence, this sample relied more on educational interventions.
Nonadherence to posttransplant regimens is common in transplant patients and has the potential for devastating consequences, including acute rejection, graft loss, decreased quality of life, and even death. Comprehensive education of patients and families that improves their understanding of posttransplant regimens and selfcare techniques can increase adherence and improve outcomes. Transplant recipients have to learn a vast amount of complex information in a short period as they recover from major surgery and cope with the emotional stress of transplantation. It is not surprising that many patients report that they do not feel ready for discharge.
To describe the development, implementation, and outcomes of a comprehensive interdisciplinary patient education program.
A quality improvement project.
A solid organ transplant unit of a large academic medical center.
In-hospital transplant patients and their families and the interdisciplinary team.
A comprehensive discharge education program that integrated written materials, patient and clinical pathways, and discharge instructions.
Improved patient satisfaction with readiness for discharge and medication teaching.
A postimplementation patient discharge survey using a 5-point Likert scale showed an increase in patients' understanding of medication dosage (3.6 to 4.6) and side effects (3.6 to 4.7), and satisfaction with the discharge teaching process (3.4 to 5.0).
Intractable hiccups can be a serious complication in transplant recipients. Unfortunately, many of the pharmacotherapies used to stop hiccups are associated with severe side effects as well as drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressants. We report a case of a heart transplant recipient who had had intractable hiccups for 2 months, resulting in severe insomnia, diminished appetite, and weight loss. To treat the hiccups, treatment with oral baclofen (5–10 mg 3 times daily) was started. After 6 weeks of therapy, the baclofen was titrated down and discontinued because it had not stopped the hiccups and was causing severe central nervous system side effects. Gabapentin (100 mg twice daily) was then prescribed and within 24 hours of the start of that treatment, the hiccups had resolved completely. After 3 weeks of therapy, the patient had no side effects and the gabapentin was subsequently discontinued. One year after stopping the gabapentin, the patient remains free of hiccups. Gabapentin appears to be a promising medication for the treatment of intractable hiccups in thoracic transplant recipients because of its lack of serious side effects at low doses, rapid onset of action, and lack of drug-drug interactions with transplant medications.
Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, the syndrome caused by an extreme release and circulation of catecholamines, shares several histopathological and clinical similarities with cardiac changes after brain death noted in animal investigations and human observation. Overwhelming stimulation of myocardial inotropic β receptors may alter their responsiveness and induce other biochemical processes, producing reduced cardiac contractility. Treatment methods in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy that use extracorporeal circulatory support and medications that do not rely on β-receptor stimulation and preemptive blockade of β receptors or calcium channels before brain death may be relevant to donor care.

Few cases of graft posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in pulmonary transplant recipients have been reported. Published data on PTLD are pooled to analyze and compare characteristics, predictors, and prognosis of pulmonary PTLDs arising in lung allograft recipients.
PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for reports of lymphoproliferative disorders occurring within the graft in lung transplant recipients. Data from 23 studies were pooled and analyzed.
Data from 137 patients (61 graft locations) with PTLD after lung transplantation were analyzed. Lung recipients with pulmonary graft PTLD were significantly more likely to have early-onset PTLD (70% vs 31%, respectively;
Pulmonary transplant recipients who show early symptoms of impaired graft function should be evaluated for a potential lung graft PTLD in addition to being assessed for risk of rejection. Further prospective studies with large populations of patients are needed to confirm these results.