This article discusses the distortive effect of the federal income tax on the efficiency
of resource allocation within and between cities. This distortion shifts production to
the smaller and less productive cities from the larger and more productive cities. To
eliminate these distortive effects, a city-size deduction should be applied. The
underlying assumption is that cities differ from one another in labor productivity
Consequently, in equilibrium, the size, the nominal income, and the price of housing
vary across cities. When a uniform income tax rate is used for financing federal
expenditure, the shadow price of housing exceeds the market price in the larger
cities, indicating that the stock of housing is too small and the per-capita housing
consumption is too large. The opposite is true in small cities, where also, if housing
and the LPG (local public good) are net substitutes, the provision of the LPG is
excessive. The article also discusses the effects of federal corporate profit taxes,
which are shown to discourage the supply of the LPG, and shows that a net land
rent tax is not always a feasible tax instrument capable of raising the predetermined
tax revenue.