Data are examined from two published experimental studies in which drivers were instructed to drive other than normally, with the traffic: for example, to minimize fuel consumption or to minimize trip time. It is found that, in general, for each 1% increase (decrease) in trip time compared to driving normally with the traffic, the fuel consumption increases (decreases) by approximately 1.1%. However, expert drivers can save fuel without increasing trip time by skillfully adjusting their speed to avoid stops at traffic signals. It is shown that the formal problem to be solved to minimize fuel consumption on an urban trip is so complicated that even a “perfect” fuel economy meter would not enable a driver to achieve this minimum.
E) and oxygen uptake (
O2) were measured and regressions between them were found for men and for women exercising from light levels (1.3 kcal/min) to maximal levels (20 kcal/min) of work. Increases in pulmonary ventilation were proportionately greater than increases in oxygen consumption, and, therefore, nonlinear regressions were determined for a range of
E which was wider than the linear regressions previously suggested by other investigators. Because the data for men and women diverged, two separate curves were computed. In addition to the sex differences, each equation had an adjustment for age. The standard error of estimate for
O2 was 0.21/min.