European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

The working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing is actively involved in international research though the UNITE (Undertaking Nursing Research Throughout Europe) research program, a new initiative for the WGCN. A group of cardiovascular nursing researchers from a number of different European countries committed themselves to a research group that is designed to promulgate international research in the field of cardiac nursing. The first study was a survey on coronary risk factors in a cohort of cardiac nurses from Europe. At this moment four additional studies are planned aimed at the development of the nursing profession in Europe and improvement of care for patients with chronic cardiac disease. If, as hoped, these studies prove to be successful, it will provide the seed for other international collaborations of this type.

The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus has continuously and rapidly increased, and the number of diabetic people in the adult population is predicted to double within 30 years. The prevalence of and mortality from all forms of cardiovascular diseases is two- to eight-fold higher in diabetic individuals as compared with their non-diabetic counterparts. The excess of risk attributable to diabetes related heart disease accounts for 2.9% of the all cause annual mortality. Moreover, the cardiovascular risk increases continuously throughout a wide spectrum of glycaemia starting already at what, according to present definitions, is considered as normal blood glucose levels. Therefore, screening for diabetes and hyperglycaemia is recommended in various clinical settings. Criteria for classification of hyperglycaemic states are provided together with their relation to risk for cardiovascular events. The evidence-based treatment of cardiovascular disease in patients with concomitant diabetes is summarised. Degree of under-treatment of patients with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases is discussed. Finally, the potential impact that nurses may have on the quality and efficacy of care in the vulnerable patient with combined chronic diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease and the improvement of the outcomes are discussed.

Poor quality of life, social isolation, depression and anxiety all have been linked to increased risk of rehospitalization and mortality in patients with heart failure. Yet, despite evidence of their importance to outcomes in heart failure patients, psychosocial factors are assessed and treated infrequently in clinical practice. Potential reasons for this include: (1) inadequate dissemination of research about the link between psychosocial factors and outcomes; (2) insufficient training in heart–mind interactions that precludes clinicians from taking advantage of what is known; (3) perceived problems with interventions or with the science of heart–mind interactions that interfere with acceptance of what is known; (4) concerns about how to measure psychosocial factors in clinical practice; and (5) lack of curiosity from clinicians about the role of psychosocial factors in their patients. In this article, each of these possible explanations is explored and recommendations suggested.

The publication of the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease has meant that audit is becoming an increasingly important part of cardiac healthcare provision in England. Comparisons between hospitals will be made so it is essential that the audit data is as robust as possible. Nurses often play a key role in the collection of such data. This article reflects on this process, with particular reference to thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Topics discussed include eligibility, the role of a clinician, electrocardiogram interpretation, justified delays, inappropriate and ‘missed’ administration. As some of the information is, arguably, open to interpretation, the authors believe that clinical auditors will inevitably have to grapple with such clinical definitions and their implications.

Introduction: Preparatory information before an invasive procedure has positive effects (e.g. on recovery, well-being and anxiety). However, preparation of patients for a repeat procedure is hardly investigated. The question is whether these patients benefit from the same preparatory information. Aims: To determine whether there are differences in terms of anxiety and well-being between patients undergoing their first percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and those undergoing a repeat PTCA. Design: Descriptive correlational study with a quantitative and qualitative research component. Method: First-time PTCA patients (n=46) and re-PTCA patients (n=40) were asked to complete three psychological self-report questionnaires (HADS, HPPQ and VAS) before the procedure. Five re-PTCA patients were interviewed the day after the procedure. Results: We were not able to show statistically significant differences between the two groups. On the anxiety scales re-PTCA patients scored 6.5 (HADS) and 4.0 (VAS) vs. 5.0 (P=0.25) and 2.6 (P=0.30) for first-time PTCA patients. On well-being (HPPQ) these differences were 18.0 vs. 19.0 (P=0.40). Once the interview data were coded, four themes were apparent, namely: recurrent symptoms, information, experience and future prospects. Conclusion: A trend is seen towards a worse condition in the re-PTCA group with respect to anxiety and well-being. However, the differences are not statistically significant, they seem to be clinically relevant. The interviews point out that the return of symptoms and future prospects, rather than the procedure itself, are an important part in preparing for a repeat intervention. This aspect is currently no part of the provided preparatory information. Future research will have to determine the most beneficial method of preparing these patients (e.g. tailored preparation, emotional support, coaching).

Background: Unrelieved anxiety can produce an increase in sympathetic nervous system activity leading to an increase in cardiac workload. Nursing interventions using music therapy or sensory information among patients with coronary artery disease has resulted in anxiety reduction, though results in Chinese subjects has not previously been published. Aims: To determine the effects of using nursing interventions of music therapy or sensory information, on reducing anxiety and uncertainty, and improving negative mood among Chinese subjects immediately prior to cardiac catheterization. Methods: An experimental three-group repeated measures design for this pilot study was used. Forty-five hospitalized adults (15/group) undergoing cardiac catheterization were randomly assigned to either (1) a music therapy intervention, (2) a sensory information intervention or (3) treatment as usual (control). Anxiety, uncertainty and mood state were measured using self-reported questionnaires and physiological measures were made at baseline, post-intervention to determine their effect and post-cardiac catheterization to determine whether these interventions had any long-lasting effect. Results: The control group was found to be significantly older (P=0.001) than the two experimental groups. Older age was associated with lower anxiety scores (r=−0.31, P=0.04 at baseline; r=−0.30, P=0.04 post-intervention; r=−0.22, P=0.15 post-cardiac catheterization). After controlling for age, the use of music therapy or sensory information did not significantly reduce anxiety, improve mood state, reduce uncertainty, decrease heart or respiratory rate among subjects undergoing cardiac catheterization. Conclusion: The non-significant result may have been affected by the small sample, and the social and cultural expectations regarding the public display of emotions among Chinese populations.

Background: Living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has positive health benefits but the impact on well-being and quality of life over a period of time has not been studied in depth. Aim: To follow patients prospectively over the first year and to compare the changes from time of ICD implantation, to 6 months and 1 year. Methods: Generalized linear models were used to assess changes through examination of health status (SF-36), psychological distress (POMS), and quality of life (QLI) scores. Results: There were 19 females (27%) and 51 males (73%) in the sample with a mean age of 64 years. There were significant improvements over time in 3 of the 8 sub-concepts of health status: role physical (P<0.001), vitality (P<0.013) and social functioning (P<0.001). The Profile of Mood States revealed significantly less total psychological distress at 6 months with a non-significant leveling off or increase at 1 year. The quality of life index revealed no significant changes over time. Conclusions: The effects of living with an ICD are not well understood. Research should continue to identify the impact over time in this population and sub-groups so that health care providers can address the social and psychological needs of this population.