Submission guidelines

Submit manuscript

Please read the guidelines in full before submitting your manuscript.
Manuscripts not conforming to these guidelines may be returned.

Submit Manuscript   opens in a new tab

This Journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics.

Sage is committed to upholding the integrity of the academic record. We encourage authors to refer to the Committee on Publication Ethics’ International Standards for Authors and view the author responsibilities section on the Sage Journal Author Gateway.

We also encourage you to familiarize yourself with our Editorial Policies and our Publication Ethics Policies.

Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. We encourage submissions and peer review from a diverse range of authors and reviewers from across all countries and backgrounds. Read our diversity, equity, and inclusion pledge.

There are no fees payable to submit or publish in this journal. Open access options are available – see below.

Please read the guidelines below then submit your manuscript here.

Access: Subscription
Accepts preprints? Yes
Identity transparency: Double anonymized

There are no fees payable to submit or publish in this journal.

Figures submitted in color will be published in color in the online version of the journal at no cost.

Optional open access publishing is available for a fee via the Sage Choice program, and Open Access agreements, where authors can publish open access either discounted or free of charge depending on the agreement with Sage. Find out if your institution is participating by visiting Open Access Agreements at Sage. Open Access agreement eligibility is determined by the corresponding author’s affiliation matching an agreement at acceptance. For more information on Open Access publishing options at Sage please visit Sage Open Access.

For information on funding body compliance, and depositing your article in repositories, please visit Sage’s Author Archiving and Re-Use Guidelines and Publishing Policies.

Guidance updated July 2025.

Please read the journal’s Aims and Scope to see if your article is appropriate. Your article must be within the scope of the journal and be of sufficient quality. If not, it will not be reviewed.

You may wish to address the fit of your article in the cover letter which you can submit alongside the manuscript.

The manuscript must be your original work, you must have the rights to the work, and you must have obtained and be able to supply all necessary permissions for the reproduction of any copyright works not owned by you, including figures, illustrations, tables, lengthy quotations, or other material previously published elsewhere.

Pay heed to Sage’s Artificial Intelligence policy, which includes helpful and supportive guidance. As per the policy, you must clearly indicate the use of language models in the manuscript, including which model was used and for what purpose. Please use the methods or acknowledgements section, as appropriate. For example, if AI was used for writing assistance, describe this in the acknowledgment section. If AI was used for data collection, analysis, or figure generation, this must be reported in the methods.

Alongside the manuscript, and in addition to the cover letter, you must upload a Title Page, including key information as specified below. You may also wish to address the editors in an additional cover letter. Submissions are received by the Psychology of Music editorial office via ScholarOne. All authors (and reviewers) require a ScholarOne account.

Please observe the following journal submission requirements in conjunction with Sage’s guidance on preparing your manuscript.

Article types

Psychology of Music publishes research articles of typically 4,000 – 6,000 words.

As of January 2025, these should take one of two formats being either:

  1. Original empirical investigations containing systematic qualitative or quantitative analyses of relevant data, or
  2. Theoretical critical papers which stimulate intellectual discourse and further research through engagement with existing concepts, models, or frameworks. This format broadly encompasses papers of various types, such as critical, methodological, and conceptual contributions to music psychology research, and systematic reviews. All such papers must constitute a rigorous, structured approach to evaluating and advancing theoretical knowledge.

We no longer accept book reviews. We do not publish conference reports or short research reports. Contributors keen to offer these forms of submission may contact the Editors-in-Chief, who may be able to advise on publication routes in their capacity as SEMPRE committee members.

Formatting your manuscript

The Psychology of Music editorial office strongly prefers manuscripts in .doc or .docx. We understand that some authors prefer LaTex document preparation, but please be aware that formatting consistency issues that arise during production require technical assistance. This could delay publication of your article.

Please observe basic manuscript article formatting conventions to ensure that your work is easy to read. E.g., use 1-inch margins, left alignment, double-space throughout the paper, and 0.5-inch indent for the first line of each paragraph. Use a readable font like 11-point Calibri or Arial, or 12-point Times New Roman.

See below for accepted file types and formatting requirements of graphics, figures etc.

Please ensure that your heading levels are clear and the sections clearly defined. It is not adequate simply to change the text appearance to bold or italic, etc. You must apply header styles as per your document preparation system to organise the structure of your manuscript.

Manuscript structure and reporting standards

We welcome original research that addresses the social impact of music, and acknowledge the diverse reporting practices inherent in critical, applied, and qualitative psychological research. Our journal's editorial policy prioritizes methodological integrity over standardized reporting.

The American Psychological Association (APA) Style, 7th edition, outlines clear guidelines for manuscript structure and reporting to promote clarity, consistency, and readability. Referencing, statistical reporting, and the presentation of tables must adhere to our guidelines (see below), which follow APA conventions. We recommend adopting APA Style broadly throughout written work.

Additionally, the APA offer guidelines including various journal article reporting standards (JARS) resources. Authors of original empirical investigations may choose to follow APA guidelines for reporting quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies.

Authors of theoretical critical papers should use an effective and transparent reporting structure appropriate to their work.

If how you wish to report your research does not align with other aspects of submission guidelines (e.g., manuscript format, word count, or data availability), we encourage authors and reviewers to consult with the Editors.

Title

Your manuscript’s title should be concise, descriptive, unambiguous, accurate, and reflect the precise contents of the manuscript. A descriptive title that includes the topic of the manuscript makes an article more findable in the major indexing services.

Abstract

Prepare an unstructured abstract of 150-200 words that concisely states the purpose of the research, its major findings, and conclusions. If your research includes clinical trials, the trial registry name, URL, and registration number must be included at the end of the abstract. At the point of submission, the web form includes a separate text box for your abstract. After acceptance, the abstract should be placed between the title and main body of your manuscript when preparing your final, de-anonymised version.

Keywords

Please prepare a minimum of 5 keywords. Keywords should be as specific as possible to the research topic. As per the Abstract, these are entered separately on submission; after acceptance, the final version should list keywords in one line after the abstract.

Artwork, figures, and other graphics

Figure resolution is 300dpi. For guidance on the preparation of illustrations, pictures, and graphs in electronic format, it is essential that authors read Sage’s artwork guidelines

Figures supplied in colour will appear in colour online regardless of whether or not these illustrations are reproduced in colour in the printed version. If you have requested colour reproduction in the print version, we will advise you of the costs on receipt of your accepted article.

Ensure that you have obtained any necessary permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures, or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. For further information including guidance on fair dealing for criticism and review, please see the Frequently Asked Questions page on the Sage Journal Author Gateway.

Reference style and citation

Psychology of Music follows APA reference style.

Every in-text citation must have a corresponding citation in the reference list and vice versa. Corresponding citations must have identical spelling and year.

Authors should update any references to preprints when a peer-reviewed version is made available, to cite the published research. Citations to preprints are otherwise discouraged.

Statistical reporting

Use tables or figures to present large amounts of statistical information clearly. Ensure clarity by labelling every statistic and providing descriptions as necessary.

  • With the exception of Greek letters, use italics for statistical symbols (M, SD, N, t, p, etc.).
  • Round to two decimal places unless more precision is necessary.
  • Provide exact p-values (e.g., p = .034) unless p < .001.

For descriptive statistics, report mean and standard deviation as M = xx.xx, SD = xx.xx. Use N for total sample size and n for subgroup sizes

For inferential statistics, present as follows:

  • t-test: t(df) = xx.xx, p = .xxx.
  • ANOVA: F(df1, df2) = xx.xx, p = .xxx, η² = .xx.
  • Chi-Square: χ²(df, N = xx) = xx.xx, p = .xxx.
  • Correlations: r(df) = .xx, p = .xxx.

Always report effect sizes to provide context for statistical significance. Common measures include:

  • Cohen’s d for t-tests (e.g., d = .xx).
  • η² or partial η² for ANOVA (e.g., η² = .xx).
  • R² for regression analyses (e.g., R² = .xx).

Report 95% confidence intervals (CI) for effect sizes and parameter estimates. E.g., M = xx.xx, 95% CI [xx.xx, xx.xx].

For regression analyses, report coefficients (e.g., B = xx.xx), standard errors, t-values, and p-values. Include R² and adjusted R² to indicate the proportion of variance explained.

Table

Use a consistent format for all tables in your manuscript, numbering tables sequentially as they appear in the text (Table 1, Table 2, etc.). Do not try to present too much data in a single table. It is better to simplify complex data into easily digestible sections.

Mention each table in the text in the order they appear. For example, "As shown in Table 1..." Tables should appear near to their first citation.

Table components
  • Clearly label all columns and rows. Use concise headings, and capitalize only the first word and proper nouns.
  • Present data clearly in rows and columns. Align numbers by decimal points for clarity.
  • Include notes below the table to explain, clarify, or provide additional information. Indicate whether these are general, specific, or probability notes.
Formatting details
  • Use minimal horizontal lines for clarity. Avoid vertical lines and shading.
  • Use the same font as the rest of your document, typically 12-point Times New Roman.
  • Tables can be single or double-spaced depending on the table’s complexity and the manuscript requirements.
Title page

Psychology of Music’s review process involves double-blind peer review. To ensure fair and anonymous peer review, your manuscript must be fully anonymized. Please ensure any identifying information is removed from the main manuscript document and included on the Title Page instead. Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers.

This version of the manuscript is sent to the peer reviewers. The Title Page will not be sent to peer reviewers.

See the Sage Journal Author Gateway for detailed guidance on making an anonymous submission.

The Title Page must include:

a. Article title
b. The full list of authors including names and affiliations of each

  • The listed affiliation should be the institution where the research was conducted. If an author has moved to a new institution since completing the research, the new affiliation can be included in a note at the end of the manuscript – please indicate this on the title page.
  • All persons eligible for authorship must be included at the time of submission (please see the authorship section for more information).

c. Contact information for the corresponding author: name, institutional address, phone, email
d. Acknowledgments section
e. Statements and declarations

  • Ethical approval and informed consent statements,/li>
  • Declaration of conflicting interest
  • Funding statement
  • Data availability statement

f. Any other identifying information related to the authors and/or their institutions, funders, approval committees, etc, that might compromise anonymity.

Acknowledgments

Any acknowledgements section will be published at the end of your article. The Acknowledgments section should include all contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship. Per ICMJE recommendations, it is best practice to obtain consent from non-author contributors who you are acknowledging in your manuscript.

If you have received any writing or editing assistance from a third-party – for example, a specialist communications company, or the use of generative AI for this purpose – this must be clearly stated in the Acknowledgements section and in the covering letter. Please see the Sage Author Gateway for what information to include in your Acknowledgements section. If your submission is being made on your behalf by someone who is not listed as an author, for example the third-party who provided writing/editing assistance, you must state this in the Acknowledgements and also in your covering letter. Please note that the journal editor reserves the right to not consider submissions made by a third party rather than by the author/s themselves.

Statements and declarations

To ensure proper anonymization, please include a section with the heading ‘Statements and Declarations’ on your Title page, after the Acknowledgements section (and Author Contributions section if applicable) including each of the sub-headings listed below. If a declaration is not applicable to your submission, you must still include the heading and state ‘Not applicable’ underneath. Please note that you may be asked to justify why a declaration was not applicable to your submission by the Editorial Office. This information will be added to the end of your published paper.

Ethical considerations

Psychology of Music requires authors to demonstrate their compliance with ethical research practices.

All papers reporting studies involving human participants, human data or human tissue must state that the relevant Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board approved the study, or waived the requirement for approval, providing the full name and institution of the review committee in addition to the approval number. If applicable, please also include this information in the Methods section of your manuscript.

You can find information on what to say in your ethical statements as well as example statements on Sage’s Publication ethics and research integrity policies page.

Please include any participant consent information under this heading and state whether informed consent to participate was written or verbal. If the requirement for informed consent to participate has been waived by the relevant Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board (i.e. where it has been deemed that consent would be impossible or impracticable to obtain), please state this. If this is not applicable to your manuscript, please state ‘Not applicable’ in this section. More information and example statements can be found on our Publication ethics and research integrity policies page.

Submissions containing any data from an individual person (including individual details, images or videos) must include a statement confirming that informed consent for publication was provided by the participant(s) or a legally authorized representative. Non-essential identifying details should be omitted. Please do not submit the participant’s actual written informed consent with your article, as this in itself breaches the participant’s confidentiality. The Journal requests that you confirm to us, in writing, that you have obtained written informed consent to publish but the written consent itself should be held by the authors/investigators themselves, for example in a patient’s hospital record. The confirmatory letter may be uploaded with your submission as a separate file in addition to the statement confirming that consent to publish was obtained within the manuscript text. If this is not applicable to your manuscript, please state ‘Not applicable’ in this section.

Declaration of conflicting interest

The journal requires a declaration of conflicting interests from all authors so that a statement can be included in your article. For guidance on conflict of interest statements, see our policy on conflicting interest declarations.

If no conflict exists, your statement should read: ‘The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article’.

Funding statement

All articles need to include a funding statement, under a separate heading, even if you did not receive funding. You’ll find guidance and examples on our Funding page.

Data availability

This journal is committed to facilitating openness, transparency and reproducibility of research, and has the following research data sharing policy.

Psychology of Music welcomes the range of research methods that researchers in our field deploy. The Editors understand that data collection, management and reporting practices for critical, applied and/or qualitative research typically involve researcher interpretation as a component of the analysis. We recognise also that researcher expertise, and researcher relationships with participants, may be a vital component of methodology. In many such cases, it may not be legal or ethical to disclose underlying datasets without substantial redaction and anonymisation.

We recognise that the work involved in communicating the integrity of underlying datasets, and in rendering them accessible and useable, is not equal (or equally appropriate) across all forms of research.

However, at point of submission all authors are required to include a data availability statement. If it is not possible to share your data, use the data availability statement to confirm why it cannot be shared.

Subject to appropriate ethical and legal considerations, all authors are strongly encouraged to:

  • Share your research data in a relevant public data repository
  • Include this source in your data availability statement
  • Cite these data in your research

Please note that it is not sufficient to state that “Data are available on reasonable request” without further detail. We offer sample statements below, including cases where data are not publicly available. Sage also provides further guidance here.

Exemplar data availability statements

Data publicly available in a repository

“The audio recordings and survey data that support the findings of this study are available in the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository under the identifier https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ABCDEFG.”

“The experimental data and the analysis scripts that support the findings of this study are available in Figshare with the identifier https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4567890.

“The anonymized interview transcripts collected are available as open data via the University of Edinburgh online data repository https://doi.org/10.5523/edinburgh.1a2b3c4d5e6f7g8h9i0j.”

Data available as supplementary information or included in main paper

“All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. Musical score annotations are provided in Supplementary Table 1, along with the original reference describing the annotation methods used in this study.”

“All data on the measured psychological responses to musical interventions that support the findings of this study are included within this paper and its Supplementary Information files.”

Data available on request but cannot be shared openly

“The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of participant confidentiality, and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data are stored in secure data storage at the Royal Northern College of Music, UK.”

“The complete audio dataset that supports the findings of this study are restricted due to Sony license agreements in place for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Access to portions of the data are available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission from Sony.”

For more information, including FAQs, please visit the Sage Research Data policy pages.

Redundant publication

The Editors of Psychology of Music ask authors to declare if any data reported in their submission have been published previously wholly or in part. For example: the reanalysis of a previously published dataset by a different set of authors would need to be declared. The publication of multiple articles using the same dataset with somewhat related outcomes could be considered inappropriate.

Within both the cover letter and the methods section, authors should declare whether datasets or participants reported in their submission overlap with any prior published work. This aids transparency and ensures that we can make a thorough editorial assessment of the study.

Supplemental material

Psychology of Music can host additional materials online (e.g. datasets, podcasts, videos, images, etc.) alongside the full text of the article. Your supplemental material must be one of our accepted file types. For that list and more information please refer to our guidelines on submitting supplemental files.

English language editing services

Authors seeking assistance with English language editing, translation, or figure and manuscript formatting to fit the journal’s specifications should consider using Sage Author Services. Visit Sage Author Services for further information.

As part of the submission process you will need to confirm that this is your original work, that you have the rights in the work, that this is for first publication in this Journal, that it is not being considered for/has not already been published elsewhere, and that you have obtained and can supply all necessary permissions for the reproduction of any copyright works not owned by you.

Please see our guidelines on prior publication and note that the journal may accept submissions of manuscripts that have been posted on preprint servers.

Preprints

The journal will consider submissions of manuscripts that have been posted on preprint servers.

Please enter the preprint DOI in the designated field when submitting your manuscript. We advise that you inform the Journal Editorial office about your posted preprint at submission.

Note that you should not post an updated version of your manuscript on a preprint server while it is being peer reviewed.

Learn more about our preprint policy.

Submission site

Submit your manuscript online via Sage Track.

IMPORTANT: Please check whether you already have an account in Sage Track before trying to create a new one. If you have reviewed or authored for the journal in the past year it is likely that you will have had an account created. For further guidance on submitting your manuscript online please visit ScholarOne Online Help.

Manuscripts should only be submitted with the consent of all contributing authors. The individual responsible for submitting the manuscript should carefully check that all those whose work contributed to the manuscript are listed as authors.

Ensure you upload all relevant manuscript files, including any additional supplemental files (including reporting guidelines where relevant).

Authorship

Please view our authorship policies, which includes information on criteria for authorship, who should be the corresponding author and more.

Please note that AI chatbots, for example ChatGPT, should not be listed as authors. For more information see the policy on Use of ChatGPT and generative AI tools.

Files

  • Title Page with all required identifying information as laid out in Preparing your manuscript for submission (above). This will not be sent to the peer reviewers.
  • Your manuscript, properly formatted and anonymized according to all stipulations above, and within the scope of the journal. Any information that compromises the anonymity of the author(s) should be removed or anonymized and included on the Title Page instead. See above for more information on anonymization. This version will be sent to the peer reviewers.
  • Figures and images.
  • Supplemental material. This journal can host additional materials online (e.g. datasets, podcasts, videos, images, etc) alongside the full-text of the article. Your supplemental material must be one of our accepted file types. For that list and more information please refer to our guidelines on submitting supplemental files.

Other information required for submission

  • ORCID ID of the submitting author.
    • It is strongly encouraged that all co-authors ensure their ORCID IDs are linked to their accounts in the submission system prior to article acceptance, as this is the only way to have their ORCID ID present on the published article. ORCID IDs cannot be added to manuscripts after acceptance/publication. Please note that each co-author must log in to the submission system to add their own ORCID ID to their account. To add an ORCID ID, edit your account, click the link when prompted, and sign into your ORCID account to validate your ID. You will then be redirected back to the submission system and your ORCID ID will become part of your accepted publication’s metadata.
    • Please create an ORCID ID if you do not already have one or visit our ORCID homepage to learn more.
  • Complete list of authors, with their institutional affiliations.
    • The author information you enter at submission must exactly match what is included on your manuscript and/or title page, including full names, academic affiliations, and corresponding author contact details.
    • The listed affiliation should be the institution where the research was conducted. If an author has moved to a new institution since completing the research, the new affiliation can be included in a note at the end of the manuscript.
    • All listed authors must meet the criteria for authorship (above).
    • All persons eligible for authorship must be included at the time of submission.
    • All authors must have given consent for the manuscript to be submitted in its current form.
  • Keywords: During submission, you may be asked to select or enter keywords for your manuscript. These keywords are used to match appropriate reviewers to your manuscript.
  • The number of figures, tables, and words in your manuscript.
  • Funder information: Name, grant/award number.
  • You may be required to enter your declaration of conflicting interest as part of the submission process, in addition to listing it on your manuscript and/or title page. Please have it on hand.
  • If you have posted your manuscript to a preprint server, you will be asked to supply the DOI (this does not prohibit submission, but no changes should be made to the preprint version while your manuscript is under evaluation in this journal). Please see our guidelines on prior publication. If the article is accepted for publication, the author may re-use their work according to the journal's author archiving policy. If your manuscript is accepted, you must include a link in your preprint to the final version of your published article.

The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:
Identity transparency:Double-anonymized
Reviewer interacts with: Editor
Review information published: None

Your manuscript will undergo an initial evaluation. If it does not conform to the requirements laid out in these guidelines, it will be returned to you for amendments prior to peer review. Manuscripts may be desk rejected without peer review at this point if they are out of scope for the journal or otherwise unsuitable.

After passing the initial evaluation, your manuscript will then be peer reviewed. You can log in at any time to check the status of your manuscript. We will notify you when a decision has been reached.

The journal adheres to a rigorous double-anonymized reviewing policy in which the identity of both the reviewer and author are always concealed from both parties. Two independent reviews are required for a manuscript to reach a Revise or Accept decision.

To ensure the integrity of the peer review process we assign reviewers and cannot accept author recommendations.

All manuscripts are reviewed as rapidly as possible, while maintaining rigor. Reviewers make comments to the author and recommendations to the Editor who then makes the final decision on all manuscripts, including those appearing in a special issue or special collection. The Editor or members of the Editorial Board may occasionally submit their own manuscripts for possible publication in the Journal. In these cases, the peer review process will be managed by alternative members of the Board and the submitting Editor/Board member will have no involvement in the decision-making process.

The journal has an Editorial Board who serve the journal as external peer reviewers. Each member of the Editorial Board are active researchers in the field and selected based on strict criteria, ensuring they possess the necessary expertise and experience. The Editor(s) may use one Editorial Board Member as a reviewer for each manuscript, and will then reach beyond this pool to include additional reviewers to meet the required number before a decision can be made. This ensures a comprehensive and robust peer review process, aligning with our commitment to publish the most credible and valid research. Care is taken not to invite any Editorial Board Member that has any potential conflict of interest with any author of the paper.

As a COPE member we engage with multiple forms of post-publication discussion in line with wider guidance from Sage: Commentaries, Critiques and Responses.

You can view our complaints and appeals policy here.

Read Sage's complete peer review policy.

Plagiarism

The journal and Sage take issues of copyright infringement, plagiarism or other breaches of best practice in publication very seriously. Please read Sage's complete policy on plagiarism and the actions we may take.

Contributor’s Publishing Agreement

Before publication, we require the author as the rights holder to sign a Journal Contributor’s Publishing Agreement. Sage’s Journal Contributor’s Publishing Agreement is an exclusive license agreement which means that the author retains copyright in the work but grants Sage the sole and exclusive right and license to publish for the full legal term of copyright. Exceptions may exist where an assignment of copyright is required or preferred by a proprietor other than Sage. In this case copyright in the work will be assigned from the author to the society. For more information please visit the Sage Journal Author Gateway.

Preprints

If your manuscript was posted on a preprint server prior to acceptance, you must include a link in your preprint to the final published version of your published article.

Production

Your Sage Production Editor will keep you informed as to your article’s progress throughout the production process. Proofs will be made available to the corresponding author via our editing portal, Sage Edit, or by email, and should be returned promptly to avoid delaying publication. Authors are reminded to check their proofs carefully to confirm that all author information, including names, affiliations, sequence, and contact details are correct, and that Funding and Conflict of Interest statements, if any, are accurate. This is the final opportunity to make changes to your manuscript. Further corrections will not be possible after publication. Changes to the author list are not permitted at this stage.

Publication

OnlineFirst publication: This enables us to publish final articles online immediately, without waiting for assignment to a future issue of the Journal. This usually significantly reduces publication lead time. Visit the Sage Journals help page for more details, including how to cite OnlineFirst articles.

Access to your published article: We provide you with online access to your published article. The online access link is provided to the corresponding author for sharing with their co-authors.

Promoting your article

Publication is not the end of the process. Between us, we can ensure that your article is found, read, downloaded and cited as widely as possible. Many of the most effective tactics are those you can do quickly and easily to your network of contacts and peers. Visit the Promote Your Article page on the Sage Journal Author Gateway for numerous resources to help you promote your work.

The Sage Journal Author Gateway has some general advice on how to get published, plus links to further resources. Sage Author Services also offers authors a variety of ways to improve and enhance your article including English language editing, plagiarism detection, and video abstract and infographic preparation.

If you have any questions about publishing with Sage, please visit the Sage Journals Solutions Portal.

You can view our complaints and appeals procedure.

Contact us

You can direct any questions to the journal’s editorial office as follows:

Editors-in-Chief: Nikki Moran and Michelle Phillips (n.moran@ed.ac.ukmichelle.phillips@rncm.ac.uk).

Assistant Editors: Karen Wise and Katerina Drakoulaki at psychologyofmusicjournal@gmail.com.

The Editors-in-Chief jointly welcome queries on any aspect of scope, methodology or authorship. Specific queries can be directed to Michelle (research ethics) and Nikki (open data / access).

Submission and production queries should be addressed to psychologyofmusicjournal@gmail.com.