BramleyT. (2008), ‘Mark Scheme Features associated with Different Levels of Marker Agreement’, paper presented at the British Educational Research Association conference, 3–6. September, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh.
2.
EricssonK.SimonH. (1993), Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, London: MIT Press.
3.
JankowiczD. (2004), The Easy Guide to Repertory Grids, Chichester: Wiley.
4.
KahnemanD.FrederickS. (2002), ‘Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement’, in GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (eds), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
KellyG. A. (1955), The Psychology of Personal Constructs, New York: Norton.
6.
StanovichK.WestR. (2002), ‘Individual differences in reasoning’, in GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (eds), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
SutoW. M. I.GreatorexJ. (2006), ‘A cognitive psychological exploration of the GCSE marking process’, Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment Publication2, 7–11.
8.
SutoW. M. I.GreatorexJ. (2008a), ‘What goes through an examiner's mind? Using verbal protocols to gain insights into the GCSE marking process’, British Educational Research Journal34, 213–33.
9.
SutoW. M. I.GreatorexJ. (2008b), ‘A quantitative analysis of cognitive strategy usage in the marking of two GCSE examinations’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice15 (1), 73–90.
10.
SutoW. M. I.NádasR. (2008a), ‘What determines GCSE marking accuracy? An exploration of expertise among maths and physics markers’, Research Papers in Education23, 477–97.
11.
SutoW. M. I.GreatorexJ. (2008b), ‘Why are some examination questions harder to mark accurately than others? Using Kelly's Repertory Grid technique to identify relevant question features’, Research Papers in Education24 (3), 335–77.
12.
SutoW. M. I.NádasR.BellJ. F. (2009), ‘Who should mark what? A study of factors affecting marking accuracy in a biology examination’, Research Papers in Education, on line.
13.
Van SomerenM.BarnardY.SandbergJ. (1994), The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes, London: Academic Press.