Birmingham Education Development Centre (1975) Continuity in Education: Junior to Secondary. Final Report, Birmingham: City of Birmingham Education Department.
2.
CapelS.Zwozdiak-MyersP.LawrenceJ. (2003), ‘A study of current practice in liaison between primary and secondary schools in physical education’, European Physical Education Review9 (2), 115–35.
3.
CapelS.Zwozdiak-MyersP.LawrenceJ. (2004), ‘Exchange of information about physical education to support the transition of pupils from primary and secondary school’, Educational Research46 (3), 283–300.
4.
Department for Education and Employment (1999), The National Curriculum: Handbook for Secondary Teachers in England, Key Stages 3 and 4, London: HMSO.
5.
Department of Education and Science (1978), Primary Education in England: A Survey by HM Inspectors of Schools, London: HMSO.
6.
Department of Education and Science (1987), The Curriculum from 5 to 16: Curriculum Matters 2, London: HMSO.
7.
Department of Education and Science (1990), Starting with Quality: Report of the Committee of Enquiry of the Secretary of State for Education and Science and the Secretary of State for Wales, London: HMSO.
8.
DerricottR. (1985), Curriculum Continuity: Primary to Secondary, Slough: NFER-Nelson.
9.
EllisS. W. (1999), ‘National Curriculum testing across the interface at Key Stage 2/Key Stage 3: A view from the bridge’, Curriculum20 (1), 38–51.
10.
GaltonM.GrayJ.RudduckJ. (1999), The Impact of School Transitions and Transfers on Pupils' Progress and Attainment, London: HMSO.
11.
GaltonM.MorrisonI.PellT. (2000), ‘Transfer and transition in English schools: Reviewing the evidence’, International Journal of Educational Research33, 341–63.
12.
GorwoodB. (1991), ‘Primary-secondary transfer after the National Curriculum’, School Organisation11 (3), 283–90.
13.
HarlandJ.MoorH. (2001), ‘Experiencing the Curriculum: The Learner's Per-spective’, paper presented at the British Educational Research Association, University of Leeds, September.
14.
HugginsM.KnightP. (1997), ‘Curriculum continuity and transfer from primary to secondary school: The case of history’, Educational Studies23 (3), 338–48.
15.
JarmanR, (1997), ‘Fine in theory: A study of primary–secondary continuity in science, prior and subsequent to the introduction of the Northern Ireland curriculum’, Educational Research39 (3), 291–310.
16.
JonesL. P.JonesL. (1993), ‘Keeping up the momentum: Improving continuity’, Education3 (13), 46–50.
17.
LanceA. (1994), ‘The case for continuity’, Forum36 (2), 46–7.
18.
LengaR.OgdenV. (2000), Lost in Transit: Attainment Deficit in Pupil Transition from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 3, London: Institute of Education.
19.
McCallumB. (1996), ‘The transfer and use of assessment between primary and secondary schools’, British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment16 (3): 10–14.
20.
National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) (1995), Continuity and Progression 5–16: Developments in Schools, Slough: NFER.
21.
Office for Standards in Education (OfStEd) (2002), Changing Schools: An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Transfer Arrangements at Age 11, London: HMSO.
22.
RudduckJ.GaltonM.GrayJ. (1998), ‘Lost in the maze of the new’, Times Educational Supplement, 20 November, p. 19.
23.
SchagenS.KerrD. (1999), Bridging the Gap? The National Curriculum and Progression from Primary to Secondary School, Slough: NFER.
24.
School Curriculum and Assessment Authority (1996), Promoting Continuity between KS2 and KS3, London: HMSO.
25.
Schools Council (1983), Primary Practice: A Sequel to the Practical Curriculum, Working Paper 75, London: Methuen.
26.
SimpsonM.GoulderJ. (1998), ‘Promoting continuity and progression: Implementing the 5–14 development programme in secondary school mathematics and English language departments’, Scottish Educational Review30 (1), 15–28.
27.
StillmanA.MaychellK. (1984), Choosing Schools: Parents, LEAs and the 1980 Education Act, Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
28.
WilliamsA. (1997) ‘Continuity and staff development, Key Stage 2—Key Stage 3: A mid-Wales approach’, Bulletin of Physical Education33 (2), 39–43.
29.
YoungmanM. B. (1980) ‘Some determinants of early secondary school performance’, British Journal of Educational Psychology50, 43–52.