BakerL.WigfieldA. (1999), ‘Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement’, Reading Research Quarterly34, 2–29.
2.
BrooksG.SchagenI.NastatP. (1997), Trends in Reading at Eight: A Report on the 1995 Survey of Reading Attainment in Year 3 in England and Wales, Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
3.
BrymanA.CramerD. (1995), Quantitative Data Analysis for Social Scientists, London: Routledge.
4.
BurnsP.RoeB.RossE. (1999), Teaching Reading in Today's Elementary School, Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.
5.
ChapmanJ.TunmerW. (1995), ‘Development of young children's reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement’, Journal of Educational Psychology87, 154–67.
6.
ChapmanJ. W.TunmerW. E.ProchnowJ. (2000), ‘Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: A longitudinal study’, Journal of Educational Psychology92, 703–8.
7.
ChengL. (1999), ‘Changing assessment: Washback on teacher perceptions and actions’, Teaching and Teacher Education15 (3), 253–71.
8.
CloerT.DaltonS. R. (2001), ‘Gender and grade differences in reading achievement and in self-concept as readers’, Journal of Reading Education26 (2), 31–6.
9.
DowningJ. (1982), ‘Reading: Skill or skills?’The Reading Teacher35, 534–7.
ElleyW. B., ed. (1994), The IEA Study of Reading Achievement and Instruction in Thirty-two School Systems, Oxford: Elsevier.
12.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975), Belief, Attitudes, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading MA: Addison Wesley.
13.
FoyP.JonceasM. (2003), ‘PIRLS sampling design’, in MartinM. O.MullinI. V. S.KennedyA. M. (eds), PIRLS 2001 Technical Report, Chestnut Hill MA: International Study Center, Boston College, pp. 29–39.
GhaithG. M.BouzeineddineA. R. (2003), ‘Relationship between reading attitudes, achievement, and learners' perceptions of their Jigsaw II co-operative learning experience’, Reading Psychology24, 105–21.
16.
GippsC.ClarkeS.McCallumB. (1998), ‘The Role of Teachers in National Assessment in England’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego CA, April.
17.
GonzalezE.KennedyA. (2003), PIRLS 2001 User Guide for the International Database, Chestnut Hill MA: Boston College.
18.
GottfriedA. (1985), ‘Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high schools students’, Journal of Educational Psychology77, 631–45.
19.
GregoryK.ClarkeM. (2003), ‘High-stakes assessment in England and Singapore’, Theory into Practice43 (1), 66–74.
20.
HattieJ. (1992), The Self-concept, Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
HoffD. (2002), ‘US, Singapore agree to co-operate on math and science’, Education Week22 (3), 10.
22.
HollowayJ. (2003), ‘A global perspective on student accountability’, Educational Leadership60, 74–6.
23.
HouseJ. D. (2003), ‘Self-esteem beliefs and reading achievement of elementary-school students in Hong Kong and the United States: Results from the PIRLS 2001 assessment’, Child Study Journal33 (4), 195–212.
24.
IEA (International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement) (2001), Framework and Specifications for PIRLS Assessment, 2nd edn, Chestnut Hill MA: PIRLS International Study Center.
25.
KooR.KamM.ChoiB. (2003), ‘Education and schooling in Hong Kong: Under one country, two systems’, Childhood Education79, 137–44.
26.
LoudenW.ChanL.ElkinsJ.GreavesD.HouseH.MiltonS.NicolsS.RohlM.RivallandJ.van KraayenordC. (2000), Mapping the Territory: Primary Students with Learning Difficulties in Literacy and Numeracy, Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
27.
MarshH.ByrneB.ShavelsonR. (1988), ‘A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relationship to academic achievement’, Journal of Educational Psychology80, 366–80.
28.
MartinM. O.MullisI. V. S.GonzalezE. J.GregoryK.GardenR. A.O'ConnorK. M.ChrostowkiS. J.SmithT. A. (2000), TIMSS 1999 International Science Report: Findings from IEA's Repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth Grade, Chestnut Hill MA: Boston College.
29.
MathewsonG. C. (1994), ‘Toward a comprehensive model of affect in the reading process’, in SingerH.RuddellR. B. (eds), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 3rd edn, Newark DE: International Reading Association, pp. 841–56.
30.
McKennaM.C. (1994), ‘Toward a model of reading attitude acquisition’, in EugeneH. C.MarriettaC. (eds), Fostering the Love of Reading: The Affective Domain in Reading Education, Newark DE: International Reading Association, pp. 18–40.
31.
McKennaM. C.KearD. J.EllsworthR. A. (1995), ‘Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey’, Reading Research Quarterly30 (4), 934–56.
32.
MorrisJ. M. (1967), Standards and Progress in Reading: Studies of children's Reading Standards and Progress in Relation to their Individual Attributes, Home Circumstances and Primary School Conditions, Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
33.
MorrisP. (1990), Curriculum Development in Hong Kong, Education Paper 7, Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong.
34.
MullisI. V. S.MartinM. O.GonzalezE. J.KennedyA. M. (eds), PIRLS 2001 International Report: IEA's Study of Reading Literacy Achievement in Primary School in Thirty-five Countries, Boston MA: International Study Center, Boston College.
35.
MullisI. V. S.MartinM. O.GonzalezE. J.GregoryK.GardenR. A.O'ConnorK. M.ChrostowkiS. J.SmithT. A. (2000), TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA's Repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth Grade, Chestnut Hill MA: Boston College.
36.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2003), Literacy Skills for the World, Paris: Institute of Statistics, OECD.
37.
OppenheimA. N. (1966), Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement, New York: Basic Books.
38.
RuddellR. B.SpeakerR. (1985), ‘The interactive reading process: A model’, in SingerH.RuddellR. B. (eds), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 3rd edn, Newark DE: International Reading Association, pp. 751–93.
39.
SilvernailD. (1996), ‘The impact of England's national curriculum and assessment system on classroom practice: Potential lessons for American reformers’, Educational Policy10 (1), 46–62.
40.
Spear-SwerlingL.SternbergR. J. (1994), ‘The road not taken: An integrative theoretical model for reading disability’, Journal of Learning Disabilities27, 91–103, 122.
41.
ThamesD. G.ReevesC. K. (1994), ‘Poor readers' attitudes: Effects of using interests and trade books in an integrated language arts approach’, Reading Research and Instruction33, 293–308.
42.
TwistL.SainsburyM.WoodthorpeA.WhettonC. (2004), Reading all over the World: National Report for England, Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
WangJ.GuthrieJ. (2004), ‘Modelling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between US and Chinese students’, Reading Research Quarterly39, 162–86.
45.
WhettonC.TwistE.SainsburyM. (2000), ‘National Tests and Target Setting: Maintaining Consistent Standards’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans LA.
46.
WigfieldA.KarpathianM. (1991), ‘Who am I and what can I do? Children's self-concepts and motivation in achievement situations’, Educational Psychologist26, 233–61.
47.
ZimmermanB. J. (1995), ‘Self-efficacy and educational development’, in BanduraA., (ed.) Self-efficacy in Changing Societies, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202–31.